Insurance and Finance Update - Written by Jere Beasley on Thursday, May 2, 2013 10:16 - 0 Comments
Our law firm tried a lawsuit in 2001 in an Alabama federal court that resulted in a $20.7 million verdict against Continental Carbon Co. The plaintiffs in the case, a number of businesses located in Columbus, Ga., and the City of Columbus, sued Continental Carbon for damages. Their damages were caused by the spewing of carbon black, a petroleum-based material used to reinforce tires and other rubber products, into the air by Continental Carbon from its Phenix City, Ala., plant. The carbon black emissions damaged the plaintiffs’ property in Columbus, which is across the Chattahoochee River from the plant.
This verdict led to the filing of five more suits against Continental Carbon, alleging similar damages. A federal appeals court upheld the verdict in our case, and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to grant Continental Carbon’s petition for certiorari. The company subsequently paid the full amount of the verdict plus interest. David Byrne, a lawyer in our firm, along with Jeff Friedman from Birmingham and Eddie Jackson from Jasper, tried the case for the Plaintiffs. They did an outstanding job in a very complex and difficult case.
Continental Carbon tried to force its liability insurance carrier to cover the claims and pay the judgment and filed suit. A federal appeals court has now affirmed a Texas district court’s ruling that Continental Carbon’s insurer is not obligated to cover $28 million in legal fees and the $20.7 million judgment stemming from the pollution suits over the company’s carbon black plant. In its order, the Fifth Circuit upheld a January 2012 decision by U.S. District Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt that National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., owes neither defense nor indemnity to Continental based on a provision in the policies excluding coverage for pollution claims. The court’s order reads:
After hearing the parties’ arguments on appeal, and after reviewing the briefs, the record, the insurance policies at issue, the applicable statutory and case law, and the district court’s summary judgment and reasoning, we affirm the district court’s judgment and adopt its analysis in full.
The decision is just the latest victory for National Union in the long-running litigation that has spanned several jurisdictions. An arbitration panel, an Oklahoma federal court and Texas state and appellate courts have also sided with the insurer. In granting National Union’s motions for summary judgment last year, Judge Hoyt found that nothing in the underlying complaints or the nine insurance policies at issue — the umbrella policies and four primary policies — showed an obligation to Continental Carbon under the circumstances. He also agreed to strike outside evidence Continental had been offered coverage, finding that Texas law’s eight corners rule barred any evidence outside the “four corners” of the complaint and the policy.
National Union had refused to cover Continental Carbon for the $20.7 million verdict and for some $28 million in other legal fees. The dispute reached arbitration in 2010, and in June of that year a panel of insurance experts ruled in National Union’s favor on the core issues in the dispute. But Continental Carbon sued National Union in Oklahoma federal court shortly thereafter, seeking to vacate the arbitration award. That court dismissed the company’s suit, and, in January 2011, a Texas state court affirmed the arbitration award. In April 2012, a Texas state appeals court also declined to toss the arbitration award.
Since our clients in the underlying case collected the full amount of the jury verdict plus interest, our lawyers weren’t involved in any of the insurance coverage issues between Continental Carbon and National Union. The insurance coverage case is National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Continental Carbon Co., which is in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Leave a Reply
- An Update on the Firm's Mass Torts Litigation
- Eight Car Makers Join in the Recall of Exploding Airbags
- The Deepwater Horizon Claims Program is Up and Running Again
- Favorite Bible Verses
- J&J Pays Oregon $4 Million To Settle Hip Implant Marketing Claims
- MF Global Officers’ Defense Cost Already At $48 Million
- GSK Fined Record $489 Million For Bribery In China
- Bank Of America’s Mortgage Backed Securities Settlement Is The Most Consumer Friendly Deal Struck Thus Far
- Alabama Supreme Court Affirms Class-Action Status For $3.2 Billion Investor Lawsuit Against CVS Caremark
- U.S. Senate Confirms Jill Pryor To 11th Circuit
- Alabama Campaigns Move Slowly Towards November
- The National Scene Begins To Generate Interest
- United Kingdom’s Government Backs BP
- U.S. Chamber Sides With Foreign Oil Company Over Its Own Members
- Halliburton Reaches Settlement On Claims
- A Confirmation Of Judge Barbier’s Ruling That BP Was Grossly Negligent
- I bought my f350 from our local ford 2 years ago it had 140000 on it in the firs...
- I have worked for dollar general for 14 1/2 years. sept 29th me and my whole cre...
- I had the same ignition problem where the car would not turn off on my 2007 HHR ...
- my recall was just preformed and power steering has gone out. are these two issu...
- I would like to know if I have A case that your firm would take on. I had severe...
- If possible, I would love to join the class action law suit.
We own a 2004 F 35...
- I am wondering about this lawsuit. What the outcome is....
- You can find more information about Lipitor and its connection to Type 2 diabete...
Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments
More In Recent Settlements
- A Further Update On The AWP Litigation
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Fort McClellan Radio Tower Collapse Case
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Sikorsky Helicopter Crash
- The Philadelphia Story
- St. Croix, Virgin Islands Settlement
Product Liability - Oct 2, 2014 13:14 - 0 Comments
More In Product Liability
- NHTSA Looking Into Ford Fiesta Door Latch Problems
- NHTSA Looks At Chrysler Minivan Stalling Issue
- NHTSA Puts Blame on GM For Hiding Ignition Switch Defect
- Aurora Shooting Victims Sue Ammunition E-Retailers
- Children’s Clothing Should Never Be Fire Traps
Recalls Update - Oct 2, 2014 9:39 - 0 Comments
More In Recalls Update
- FDA Tells Compounder To Recall Contaminated Goods Again
- More Than 200,000 Pairs Of Children’s Sunglasses Recalled
- Cabrinha Recalls Kiteboarding Control System Due To Risk Of Injury
- iDevices Recalls Temperature Probes Due To Ingestion Hazard
- AmTRAN Video Recalls To Repair 42-Inch JVC Flat Panel Televisions