Employment and FLSA Litigation - Written by Beasley Allen on Wednesday, June 6, 2012 13:28 - 0 Comments
Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation Settles Discrimination Claims Involving Women On Maternity Leave
The Department of Justice has settled its lawsuit against the Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation (MGIC) for discriminating against women on maternity leave in violation of the Fair Housing Act. This settlement is the Department’s first involving discrimination against women and families in mortgage insurance. The 2011 lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleged that MGIC required women on maternity leave to return to work before the company would insure their mortgages even for women who had a guaranteed right to return to work after the leave. Most mortgage lenders require applicants seeking to borrow more than 80% of their home’s value to obtain mortgage insurance.
The settlement, which has been approved by the court, establishes a $511,250 fund to compensate 70 individuals whom the United States identified as aggrieved by the alleged discriminatory treatment between 2007 and 2010. The settlement also requires MGIC to pay a $38,750 civil penalty to the United States. The Department of Justice identified the aggrieved individuals based on its extensive review of MGIC’s mortgage application records. It was reported that MGIC cooperated with the U.S. Government in turning over records during the course of settlement negotiations.
The settlement also requires MGIC to follow a number of detailed nondiscriminatory provisions in its future review of mortgage insurance applications involving women or men who are on, or have returned from, paid or unpaid leave related to the birth, adoption, or foster care placement of a child. The settlement requires further that MGIC must monitor its treatment of applicants on leave to care for a new child, to train its employees on the requirements of the fair housing laws, and to provide nondiscrimination notices to mortgage applicants.
This lawsuit arose as a result of a complaint filed with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development by a Wexford, Pa., loan applicant. After investigating the complaint, HUD issued a charge of discrimination and referred the case to the Department of Justice after the parties were unable to settle their dispute and the complainant elected to have the case heard in federal court. The Department of Justice filed the case under the Attorney General’s authority to seek redress for housing discrimination that raises an issue of general public importance.
The HUD complainant will receive $42,500 from the settlement fund, to address her specific pain and suffering and compensate her for leave that she forfeited in response to MGIC’s requirement that she return to work. Individuals compensated as part of the settlement will remain eligible to receive compensation from the separate private class action lawsuit brought by the HUD complainant.
MGIC has entered into a preliminary settlement of the class action lawsuit, which remains subject to court approval, allowing victims of MGIC’s alleged maternity leave discrimination to submit claims for extraordinary damages above the amount covered by the compensation provided through MGIC’s settlement with the United States.
Source: infozine.com
- Jere Beasley Report, April 2013
- Marc McHenry Hired As Investigator
- Alabama to Receive $1,039,078 in Multi-State Settlement
- COSTCO Recalls Gold Coast Crab Dip
- Major Banks Assist In Payday Loans Banned By States
- We Have Allowed A Culture Of Violence To Be Created In The U.S.
- Parting Words
- Closing Observations
- Favorite Bible Verses
- WSFA News Defenders Interviews
- Beasley Allen Hosts The Child Safety Helmet Giveaway
- SPLC Looks At How Payday And Title Loans Prey On Alabama’s Poorest
- Employee Spotlights
- Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods
- Winn-Dixie Recalls Organic Apple Juice On Mold Fears
- Manda Packing Recalling 468,000 Pounds Of Meat
- Carter’s Recalls Infant Clothings With Zippers Due To Choking Hazard
- I wondered why i couldn't find him on the DPS website.
Tell Marc to contact me...
- I want to be involved in this lawsuit. I was a 3rd key making $8.25 per hour wi...
- Great to find a site like this that informs us of what our tax dollars are payin...
- can you please emaik me a copy of your article on april 16th wells fargo suid f...
- ALL OF THESE STORIES ARE SIMILAR AND ALMOAT THE SAME IN TIME FRAMES. FOR TWO YEA...
- they tried forexloaing on my home with a fraudulent note. how do I know that? I ...
- Yes, Sharon, we were aware of the button... however, it didn't work. Took it to...
- When would we get paid?...
Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments
Settlement In BTSI Defect Case
More In Recent Settlements
- A Further Update On The AWP Litigation
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Fort McClellan Radio Tower Collapse Case
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Sikorsky Helicopter Crash
- The Philadelphia Story
- St. Croix, Virgin Islands Settlement
Liability, Personal Injury, Product Liability - May 2, 2013 8:56 - 0 Comments
Kentucky Jury Awards Significant Damages In Defective Cochlear Implant Case
More In Product Liability
- Colorado Jury Finds Helmet Maker Riddell At Fault
- Remington Model 700 Misfires
- Submersion Lawsuit Highlights Escape Design Gaps
- Ford Ordered To Pay Driver $3 Million For Injuries In 2009 Crash
- Court Upholds $33 Million Verdict In Fatal Van Rollover Against Cooper Tire
Recalls Update - May 3, 2013 9:23 - 0 Comments
Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods
More In Recalls Update
- Winn-Dixie Recalls Organic Apple Juice On Mold Fears
- Manda Packing Recalling 468,000 Pounds Of Meat
- Carter’s Recalls Infant Clothings With Zippers Due To Choking Hazard
- Small World Toys Recalls Spin-A-Mals Farm And Safari Puzzles
- Infant Froggy Socks Sold At Cracker Barrel Recalled
Leave a Reply