Employment and FLSA Litigation - Written by Beasley Allen on Wednesday, June 6, 2012 13:28 - 0 Comments

Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation Settles Discrimination Claims Involving Women On Maternity Leave

The Department of Justice has settled its against the Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation (MGIC) for discriminating against women on maternity leave in violation of the Fair Housing Act. This is the Department’s first involving against women and families in mortgage insurance. The 2011 , filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleged that MGIC required women on maternity leave to return to work before the company would insure their mortgages even for women who had a guaranteed right to return to work after the leave. Most mortgage lenders require applicants seeking to borrow more than 80% of their home’s value to obtain mortgage insurance.

The , which has been approved by the court, establishes a $511,250 fund to compensate 70 individuals whom the United States identified as aggrieved by the alleged discriminatory treatment between 2007 and 2010. The also requires MGIC to pay a $38,750 civil penalty to the United States. The Department of Justice identified the aggrieved individuals based on its extensive review of MGIC’s mortgage application records. It was reported that MGIC cooperated with the U.S. Government in turning over records during the course of negotiations.

The also requires MGIC to follow a number of detailed nondiscriminatory provisions in its future review of mortgage insurance applications involving women or men who are on, or have returned from, paid or unpaid leave related to the birth, adoption, or foster care placement of a child. The requires further that MGIC must monitor its treatment of applicants on leave to care for a new child, to train its employees on the requirements of the fair housing laws, and to provide nondiscrimination notices to mortgage applicants.

This arose as a result of a complaint filed with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development by a Wexford, Pa., loan applicant. After investigating the complaint, HUD issued a charge of and referred the case to the Department of Justice after the parties were unable to settle their dispute and the complainant elected to have the case heard in federal court. The Department of Justice filed the case under the General’s authority to seek redress for housing that raises an issue of general public importance.

The HUD complainant will receive $42,500 from the fund, to address her specific pain and suffering and compensate her for leave that she forfeited in response to MGIC’s requirement that she return to work. Individuals compensated as part of the will remain eligible to receive compensation from the separate private class action brought by the HUD complainant.

MGIC has entered into a preliminary of the class action , which remains subject to court approval, allowing victims of MGIC’s alleged maternity leave to submit for extraordinary damages above the amount covered by the compensation provided through MGIC’s with the United States.

Source: infozine.com



Leave a Reply

Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

Powered by WP Hashcash

Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments

Settlement In BTSI Defect Case

More In Recent Settlements


Liability, Personal Injury, Product Liability - May 2, 2013 8:56 - 0 Comments

Kentucky Jury Awards Significant Damages In Defective Cochlear Implant Case

More In Product Liability


Recalls Update - May 3, 2013 9:23 - 0 Comments

Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods

More In Recalls Update