Health Care Issues - Written by Beasley Allen on Thursday, February 9, 2012 14:57 - 0 Comments

Watchdog Cites Conflicts In Calling For New Yaz Panel

An independent watchdog group has asked the to disregard a safety panel’s recommendation to keep the popular drugs Yaz and on the market. Evidence was cited that several panel members operated under conflicts of interest. Danielle Brian, Executive Director of the Project of Government Oversight, stated in a letter to the FDA:

Because of the [pharmaceutical] industry ties of these members, the joint committee’s conclusion – which amounted to an endorsement of the safety of these oral contraceptives – should be disregarded.

The Jan. 11 open letter was e-mailed to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg and addressed concerns over the outcome of the December joint meeting of two federal advisory panels to address the safety of drospirenone-containing oral contraceptives like Bayer’s and . The FDA sponsored the meeting of the agency’s Reproductive Health Drugs Advisory Committee and Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee. The joint panel voted 15 to 11 against a and recall, but also voted 21-5 in favor of increased information on the potential risk of blood clots on the labeling of Bayer’s popular pills.

Recent studies have found that drospirenone causes a greater risk of blood clots than similar ingredients used in previous types of pills. Thousands of lawsuits are pending across the country alleging that , its predecessor, , and the generic Ocella cause heart attacks, strokes and gallbladder failure. According to the watchdog’s letter, at least four members of the committee either were paid as consultants by Bayer or received research funding from the drug company or one of its subsidiaries. It was stated in the letter:

In the future, if a reasonable person would have questions about the impartiality of any member of an advisory committee regarding a matter before the committee, the FDA should not allow that member to participate in the matter and should make public the relevant information about that committee member.

In light of the evidence concerning Bayer’s financial ties to committee members, the watchdog’s letter stated that a “new advisory committee – without questionable impartiality or any conflicts of interest – should re-evaluate the safety of and .

Source: Lawyers USA Online



Leave a Reply

Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

Powered by WP Hashcash

Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments

Settlement In BTSI Defect Case

More In Recent Settlements


Liability, Personal Injury, Product Liability - May 2, 2013 8:56 - 0 Comments

Kentucky Jury Awards Significant Damages In Defective Cochlear Implant Case

More In Product Liability


Recalls Update - May 3, 2013 9:23 - 0 Comments

Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods

More In Recalls Update