The U.S. Supreme Court, in a very important decision, ruled last month that federal regulations setting vehicle safety standards do not bar lawsuits seeking damages from automakers for installing lap-only seat belts. The unanimous ruling held that a California lawsuit against Mazda Motor Corp. over a fatal 2002 collision involving a 1993 Mazda minivan could proceed. A passenger sitting in a rear seat and wearing a lap-only seat belt was killed.
The lawsuit filed by the family of the passenger, Thanh Williamson, alleged that the minivan was defectively designed because it lacked a lap-and-shoulder seat belt for the rear seat. Mazda said it complied with federal safety regulations in effect at the time and that an appellate court in California correctly ruled the product liability lawsuit could not go forward. The Supreme Court disagreed and overturned the appellate court ruling.
Justice Stephen Breyer said in the Court’s opinion that the federal safety regulation does not preempt state tort lawsuits claiming manufacturers should have installed lap-and-shoulder belts, instead of lap-only belts, on rear inner seats. The ruling adopted the position argued by the Obama Administration, which said California and other courts have interpreted federal law too broadly in barring lawsuits against automakers that put in lap-only seat belts. It said the federal regulations were meant only as minimum standards. The vehicle safety regulations have been changed, and most passenger vehicles built after September 1, 2007, include shoulder-and-lap seat belts in all rear seats that face forward. The Administration said the issue still was important and estimated that more than 1 million vehicles in the United States still have some lap-only belts. This is an extremely important ruling and is a victory for consumers. The Court has cleared up the confusion caused by the misapplication of an earlier High Court decision, Geiger v. America Honda Motor Co. This should take away from automakers a bogus defense, i.e., federal preemption, in their efforts to avoid liability in meritorious cases. It will also give victims an opportunity to hold wrongdoers accountable.
Source: Insurance Journal
Contact us today for a free legal consultation with an experienced attorney.
Fields marked *may be required for submission.
If you would like to subscribe to the Jere Beasley Report digital edition, simply visit our Subscriptions page and provide the necessary information or call us at 800-898-2034.
Attorney Advertising - Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.