Mass Torts Update - Written by Beasley Allen on Thursday, April 28, 2011 13:44 - 3 Comments

DePuy’s Hip Recall update

Tags: ,

After ASR XL Acetabular and ASR Resurfacing hip systems (ASR hips) were recalled in August 2010, the manufacturers, DePuy Orthopedics and Johnson and Johnson (J & J), launched a very aggressive campaign to defend the hip failure cases that have been filed against them. The ASR hips have been shown to have an exceptionally high rate of revision (i.e., second / follow-up) surgeries within a short period of time from the original hip implant surgery. The metal-on-metal design of the ASR hips has led to metal particles entering into the user’s bloodstream causing metal poisoning. This metal poisoning and the general defective design of the ASR hips have also led to instances of dislocation, hip mal-alignment issues and bone fractures. Combined, these issues were the primary reason for the ASR hip recall.

Realizing that they have a major problem with the defective ASR hips, DePuy and J & J immediately upon the recall instituted a “medical bill reimbursement program.” This program allows DePuy to pay for medical bills associated with the follow-up care and treatment of the defective ASR hip device, including any potential revision surgeries. However, DePuy has required ASR hip users to obtain a number and sign a medical authorization release, which violates many of the users’ rights. This release effectively authorizes DePuy to gain access and information about ASR users’ potential case that DePuy would not otherwise have. For instance, the release allows DePuy, through the company that DePuy has hired to handle this program – Broadspire – to speak directly with the ASR user, his or her physicians, along with obtaining the ASR device if there is a need for a revision surgery.  If an ASR device is in DePuy’s possession that will negatively affect any potential client’s case.

Recently, through the efforts of the MDL Plaintiffs’ leadership committee (PSC), DePuy has agreed to not require clients to sign these releases and has agreed to pay for ASR users’ medical bills. However, the ASR user should not communicate with DePuy or Broadspire directly.  Instead, potential clients should go through their to handle any medical billing issues because DePuy and/or Broadspire has the ability to record any communications over the phone to use against a potential client. Direct communication between ASR users and DePuy can lead to many ways that DePuy can take advantage of an unrepresented ASR user. Therefore, if ASR hip users are interested in this reimbursement program, it would be in their best interest to get a to act on their behalf when dealing with DePuy or Broadspire regarding payment of their medical bills.

If you need additional information on the subject, contact Navan Ward, a in our Mass Torts Section, at 800-898-2034 or by email at As you may recall, Navan serves on the PSC for the MDL.


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

mary@asr hip recall
Sep 6, 2011 19:33

Those information will truly help the people to understand the issue of the Depuy Hip Recall.

Attorneys for hip replacement
Feb 14, 2012 18:07

It is essential that the patients who received a hip implant to find out about the recalls issued by Depuy. They have the legal right to seek compensation for all the injuries, damages and suffering caused by the defective implants.

Stryker Hip Recall Blog
Nov 1, 2012 0:00

Defective implants could have been avoided if the public were given notice about it. Now, that a lot get involve already then affected patients has the right to protect their self and to know also their rights that they should be exercising.

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

Powered by WP Hashcash

Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments

Settlement In BTSI Defect Case

More In Recent Settlements

Product Liability - May 5, 2015 14:44 - 0 Comments

Recreational Vehicle Manufacturer Fined More Than $600,000 For Violations

More In Product Liability

Recalls Update - May 5, 2015 8:14 - 0 Comments

Jeni’s Issues Recall After Listeria Found

More In Recalls Update