The Consumer Corner - Written by Beasley Allen on Friday, December 18, 2009 11:11 - 0 Comments
Fewer 2010-model vehicles pass tougher safety tests
At least one test for safety ratings on automobiles has gotten lots tougher and that’s good news for all U.S. citizens. A new roof-strength requirement aimed at protecting passengers in rollover crashes has cut the number of top-rated vehicles from 94 in 2009 to 27 for the 2010 model year. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety added the roof test to the already-rigorous tests it uses to address increasingly-specific circumstances under which drivers and passengers are injured and killed in collisions.
The Institute, an auto-safety research group, named 19 cars and eight sport-utility vehicles as “top safety picks.” Among them are the Audi A3, Honda Civic, Dodge Journey and Ford Taurus. Auto makers with the most top-rated models include Subaru, a unit of Fuji Heavy Industries, with five vehicles making the cut. Ford Motor Co. and its Volvo unit had six top-rated vehicles, and Volkswagen AG and its Audi unit combined for five vehicles. Four Chrysler LLC vehicles got the top rating. General Motors Corp.’s Buick LaCrosse and Chevrolet Malibu are also on the list. Among major auto makers with no top picks is Toyota Motor Corp.
To become a top safety pick, a vehicle must have the insurance group’s top rating of “good” in front, side, rollover and rear-impact crash tests and also have electronic stability control, which helps drivers maintain control of their vehicles in situations that might otherwise result in crashes.
According to Adrian Lund, president of the Insurance Institute, his group tests about 50 to 55 vehicles during the model year. Additional cars are tested at the request of car makers. In those tests the car makers pay for the test vehicle. At the beginning of the 2009 model year, 72 vehicles received the group’s top rating. By the end of the year, following additional tests, the list grew to 94. But, as expected, the 2010-model roof-strength requirement reduced the list considerably. In this test, a metal plate is pressed against one corner of the roof. To receive a top rating, the roof must withstand a force equal to four times the vehicle’s weight without crushing the roof five inches inward.
Earlier this year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration finally decided to make its roof-strength test more stringent. In NHTSA’s new test, a force equal to 2.5 times a vehicle’s weight will be applied separately to the right and left sides of the roof. The rule will limit how much the roof can buckle under the pressure. As you may know, the previous standard was 1.5 times the vehicle’s weight. The federal standard sets a minimum requirement every vehicle must meet. The Insurance Institute tests are designed to show consumers the differences between one vehicle and another under more severe crash conditions. This is the main difference between the two safety groups’ test programs.
Roof strength has long been a point of contention between the Insurance Institute and the auto industry. For many years, car makers have resisted tougher roof-strength standards. The Institute believes that, while seat belts and crash-avoidance technology like electronic stability control are critical in reducing rollover fatalities, a strong roof is better at maintaining the overall integrity of a vehicle’s passenger compartment. The Institute’s research, which looked specifically at rollover crashes, shows that occupants die more often in vehicles with weaker roofs. NHTSA has known this for a long time, and so have the automobile manufacturers. Hopefully, once the president and Congress get through with healthcare reform they will take a closer look at NHTSA and do some reform there.
Source: Wall Street Journal
- Baby's death results in lawsuit against Wal-Mart
- Auto repair shops win $15 million from insurer
- Jury awards former gymnastics coach $25.5 million
- OSHA fines Massachusetts firm over ice machine death
- Building Oaks of Righteousness
- Yaz litigation continues to grow
- Health care fraud costs are huge
- FBI warned about mortgage fraud problem in 2004
- Industrial Poultry Farming Operations Cause Problems for Residents
- Home Improvement Report Recalled by Oxmoor House
- Toyota has massive safety issues
- Living the Victorious Christian Life
- A Monthly Reminder
- A Bad Scene in Washington
- Pride Leads to Arrogance
- Favorite Bible Verse
- Nice Guys Don’t Always Finish Last
- A Message From Alabama State Bar President Tom Methvin
- March For Babies 2010 Coming Soon
- Valentine Cards Delivered to Brantwood
- LawCall Is Still Getting Lots of Attention
- Carol Stanley Works For TBI Victims
- 3/10.2010
Attorney Jeremy Hancock Cullman, AL was appointed as attorney for tee...
- My daughter who is in the US Navy drove approx.....5 hours from NJ on her way to...
- Thanks for all the information. I have intended to buy a Prius when I think it i...
- The case has not yet gone to court. We will continue to follow the case and pro...
- I think one of the most important things chemical reform can do to protect us is...
- Who won this case?...
- Any idea about final payment for for us less important stroke victims?
Thanx....
- I have a 2005 explorer that is doing the same thing, plus the coast button actua...
- Beasley Allen
- Extreme Montgomery
- Jere Beasley Report
- Legal Strategies
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Coal Ash Spill
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Serious Injuries
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Toyota Unintended Acceleration
- Denied Disability
- Morgan Keegan Fraud
- Digitek Recall
- Reglan Lawyer
- Lantus Attorney
- Gardasil
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Steven Johnson Syndrome
- Vytorin Cancer
- Antibiotics
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Fleet Attorney
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Yaz Side Effects
- Chantix Recall
- Trasylol Recall
- Pain Pumps
- Heparin Recall
Recent Settlements - Sep 3, 2009 12:59 - 0 Comments
Wal-Mart parking lot case is settled
More In Recent Settlements
- Interstate death case settles
- Mississippi case involving man crushed by pipe won on appeal
- Death case settled in Troy, Alabama
- Oral Sodium Phosphate Litigation
- Road Rage case settles in an Alabama Court
Product Liability - Mar 4, 2010 10:08 - 0 Comments
Jury Awards Woman $23.4 Million Against Ford Motor Co.
More In Product Liability
- Ford Liable for Defective Fuel Tank
- Caterpiller must Pay $54 Million to Paralyzed Texas Worker
- Machine Hazards are a Serious Safety Risk for Workers
- Honda Adds Vehicled to Recall Over Airbags
- Our Firm Has Filed Three Class Actions Based on Behalf of Toyota Owners Affected by the Massive Recalls
Recalls Update - Mar 4, 2010 11:30 - 0 Comments
Innovage LLC Recalls Discovery Lamps for Children Due To Fire and Burn Hazards
More In Recalls Update
- Generation 2 Worldwide and “ChildESIGNS” Drop Side Crib Brands Recalled
- Products Made For Children in China Pulled From Stores in U.S.
- Chrysler to Fix Airbags in Some 355,500 Minivans
- Hyundai Issues Voluntary Recall on Sonata Sedan
- Honda Launches Recall to Repair Airbags
Leave a Reply