Arbitration Update - Written by Jere Beasley on Tuesday, December 30, 2008 13:42 - 1 Comment

Court Says Blackwater Suit Will Stay In Arbitration

A federal court has ordered a hearing on the deaths of four Worldwide guards in Iraq back to private arbitration. This will shield the contractor from a public investigation into the bloody 2004 ambush. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed a petition by the families of the guards to move the case into public courts. contended that the men signed contracts that required disputes to be resolved by confidential . The court’s ruling will result in the dispute being settled by a three-person panel.

The court’s ruling will benefit and other contractors. The confidential hearings will keep the public from knowing how bad really is. Private contractors profiting in Iraq should be liable for employee injuries and deaths if these contractors are a fault. They don’t want their employees to have access to courts. Four guards – Stephen Helvenston, Mike Teague, Jerko Zovko and Wesley Batalona – were ambushed and killed in Fallujah, west of Baghdad, in March 2004. The images of their mutilated bodies hanging from a bridge sparked a massive offensive by U.S. troops in the city.

A representative for the families of the four men sued the company in January 2005, claiming broke its contract by failing to provide proper equipment and security while the men were in hostile territory. The case was ordered into in April 2007. Lawyers for the families appealed a month later. A three-judge panel from the Court of Appeals ruled the court did not have jurisdiction over the appeal of the case. Unless the families appeal, the confidential panel will keep the case. When it comes to access to the courts by a victim of wrongdoing this is a very sad ending to this matter.

Source: The Virginian-Pilot



1 Comment

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Mo
Dec 30, 2008 15:30

Sad, except for the fact that they collect Defense Base Act insurance, which is the government contractor’s version of Workers’ Comp. And, like Workers’ Comp, the social compact is behind the “insurance” is that you never have to go to court or to prove liability, all you have to do is show harm and then collect $$$. So the fact that some ambulance-chaser plaintiff’s lawyer won’t get 1/3 of a giant windfall ain’t exactly breaking my heart. But write it up as a tragedy—anything to polarize the debate and villify gov’t contractors, right?

Leave a Reply

Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

Powered by WP Hashcash

Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments

Settlement In BTSI Defect Case

More In Recent Settlements


Liability, Personal Injury, Product Liability - May 2, 2013 8:56 - 0 Comments

Kentucky Jury Awards Significant Damages In Defective Cochlear Implant Case

More In Product Liability


Recalls Update - May 3, 2013 9:23 - 0 Comments

Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods

More In Recalls Update