Product Liability - Written by Jere Beasley on Thursday, September 18, 2008 10:37 - 0 Comments
Carbon nanofibers may mimic asbestos
Once upon a time, asbestos was considered a wonder material. Chemically inert and an impressive insulator, it was put to use in a variety of industrial and structural settings. Epidemiologists eventually traced an otherwise rare form of cancer back to lung exposure to asbestos particles, and building owners have been paying to have asbestos safely removed ever since. These days, nanomaterials are the objects of wonder, but, as early as 2006, some researchers were recognizing similarities in the properties of carbon nanofibers and asbestos. A paper published by Nature Nanotechnology suggests that the similarities go beyond appearances, as preliminary tests suggest carbon nanofibers pose the same health risks that asbestos does.
From a biological perspective, the fact that asbestos is chemically inert is actually part of the problem. The body can eventually absorb or encapsulate a wide variety of materials that wind up internalized, but there are simply no routes for cells to digest asbestos fibers. The alternate route, encapsulation, doesn’t work well either. Asbestos fibers have a high length-to-width ratio (called an aspect ratio), which makes them hard for the body to deal with. They’re small enough that single cells try to absorb them, but large enough that they fail, which triggers an indefinite inflammatory response in macrophages, the cells tasked with engulfing foreign material.
How this plays out in terms of asbestos isn’t fully described, but appears to start with the small asbestos fibers traveling deep into the lung. Once there, fibers can actually be driven through cells and into the internal side of the lung, where it lodges into the mesothelial cells that line the organs and cavities of the trunk. Macrophages try to absorb any parts of the fiber that protrude, fail, and trigger an inflammatory response. This perpetual inflammation, combined with the cellular damage, helps drive the mesothelial cells into a cancerous state, producing the signature disease of asbestos exposure, mesothelioma.
Research has suggested that any fiber that’s inert, small enough to make it to the lungs, and has a length-to-thickness ratio of seven or more could be capable of causing similar problems. That’s where the concerns about nanofibers started. These fibers, which are commercially available, are often only tens of nanometers in diameter, but can extend for tens of microns. The chemical bonds among the carbon atoms that comprise them are also biochemically inert.
A number of studies have looked at the effect of carbon nanofibers on cultured cells, but the authors of a new paper took the studies into a more directly relevant model: the mouse. They injected carbon nanofibers, along with tangled carbon nanotubes and graphite powder, into the peritoneal cavity of mice; asbestos was also injected as a control. At two time intervals later, they washed the cavity out with saline and sampled the cells present in the wash. Two samples of untangled nanofibers produced an inflammatory response that was statistically indistinguishable from that triggered by asbestos.
When examined at the cellular level, tangled nanofibers were safely ingested and stored in macrophages. In contrast, the fibers caused what the authors termed “frustrated phagocytosis,” where the macrophage appears as if it had been pierced by the fiber while trying to engulf it. Sections of the peritoneal cavity wall of these animals reveal the presence of large numbers of immune cells.
The authors caution that these results are not yet conclusive, as we lack two additional bits of data. This work hasn’t demonstrated that the nanofibers actually reach the lung or cross into the body side of the organ when ingested via breathing. On the other end of the process, the researchers haven’t demonstrated that this inflammation ultimately produces mesothelioma. It does, however, suggest that studies directed towards finding out should be pursued as soon as possible and that, in the meantime, a cautious approach to nanofiber exposure may be warranted.
- Building Oaks of Righteousness
- Yaz litigation continues to grow
- Health care fraud costs are huge
- FBI warned about mortgage fraud problem in 2004
- Toyota has massive safety issues
- Chevrolet Cobalt Steering Complaints Being Investigated
- A Message From Alabama State Bar Association President Tom Methvin
- Beasley Allen lawyer travels to Washington for hearings
- Living the Victorious Christian Life
- A Monthly Reminder
- A Bad Scene in Washington
- Pride Leads to Arrogance
- Favorite Bible Verse
- Nice Guys Don’t Always Finish Last
- A Message From Alabama State Bar President Tom Methvin
- March For Babies 2010 Coming Soon
- Valentine Cards Delivered to Brantwood
- LawCall Is Still Getting Lots of Attention
- 3/10.2010
Attorney Jeremy Hancock Cullman, AL was appointed as attorney for tee...
- My daughter who is in the US Navy drove approx.....5 hours from NJ on her way to...
- Thanks for all the information. I have intended to buy a Prius when I think it i...
- The case has not yet gone to court. We will continue to follow the case and pro...
- I think one of the most important things chemical reform can do to protect us is...
- Who won this case?...
- Any idea about final payment for for us less important stroke victims?
Thanx....
- I have a 2005 explorer that is doing the same thing, plus the coast button actua...
- Beasley Allen
- Legal Strategies
- Extreme Montgomery
- Jere Beasley Report
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Coal Ash Spill
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Serious Injuries
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Morgan Keegan Fraud
- Denied Disability
- Toyota Unintended Acceleration
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Yaz Side Effects
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Gardasil
- Heparin Recall
- Pain Pumps
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Reglan Lawyer
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Chantix Recall
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Trasylol Recall
- Steven Johnson Syndrome
- Fleet Attorney
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Digitek Recall
- Lantus Attorney
- Antibiotics
Recent Settlements - Sep 3, 2009 12:59 - 0 Comments
Wal-Mart parking lot case is settled
More In Recent Settlements
- Interstate death case settles
- Mississippi case involving man crushed by pipe won on appeal
- Death case settled in Troy, Alabama
- Oral Sodium Phosphate Litigation
- Road Rage case settles in an Alabama Court
Featured, Toyota Litigation Update - Mar 15, 2010 8:00 - 0 Comments
Beasley Allen lawyer travels to Washington for hearings
More In Product Liability
- Jury Awards Woman $23.4 Million Against Ford Motor Co.
- Ford Liable for Defective Fuel Tank
- Caterpiller must Pay $54 Million to Paralyzed Texas Worker
- Machine Hazards are a Serious Safety Risk for Workers
- Honda Adds Vehicled to Recall Over Airbags
Recalls Update - Mar 4, 2010 11:30 - 0 Comments
Innovage LLC Recalls Discovery Lamps for Children Due To Fire and Burn Hazards
More In Recalls Update
- Generation 2 Worldwide and “ChildESIGNS” Drop Side Crib Brands Recalled
- Products Made For Children in China Pulled From Stores in U.S.
- Chrysler to Fix Airbags in Some 355,500 Minivans
- Hyundai Issues Voluntary Recall on Sonata Sedan
- Honda Launches Recall to Repair Airbags
Leave a Reply