Mass Torts - Written by Jere Beasley on Tuesday, August 12, 2008 8:04 - 0 Comments
Study Details Women’s Risks After Stopping Hormones
In a related matter, a new study has provided more information relating to hormones. Among the many unanswered questions about hormones prescribed for menopause is whether a woman’s health risks change after she stops taking the pills. This study shows that virtually all the benefits disappear but that a slightly higher risk for breast and other cancers persists for at least three years after stopping the drugs. The data come from a major study by the Women’s Health Initiative that looked at 16,000 women who used the estrogen and progestin combination drug Prempro, made by Wyeth.
Reporting in the current Journal of the American Medical Association, the study’s investigators urge caution in interpreting the results, noting that a woman’s individual risk remains small. The excess cancer risk among former hormone users translates to an added annual risk of 0.3% for an individual woman, or three additional cases of breast or other cancers a year among 1,000 women. The findings do not change recommendations for hormone use, which advise that women consider using hormones only if they have moderate to severe hot flashes and other symptoms, and only at the lowest dose and for the shortest possible time. Dr. Gerardo Heiss, the report’s lead author and a professor of epidemiology from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, observed:
What we found in the study is quite consistent with the current guidelines. There is no reason for alarm. The absolute risk is of small magnitude.
One of the biggest benefits of hormone drugs, an improvement in bone health, all but disappears during the three years after women stopped taking the drugs. But risks like blood clots, stroke, and heart attacks originally seen among older hormone users in the study also quickly dropped back to normal rates once women stopped the drugs. The research was halted in mid-2002 because older women in the study were at higher risk for heart attacks if they began using hormones. It appears that the findings have changed the medical community’s views on hormone therapy, which was once used as a treatment to prevent chronic disease. Currently, menopause hormones are advised only for the treatment of moderate to severe hot flashes and other menopause symptoms, and doctors typically prescribe far lower doses of the drugs than those used in the study. The report focuses on the three years after the end of the study, comparing the health of women who took hormones with that of participants who took placebos.
It was reported that future papers will analyze cancer trends in the study. During the three years women stopped taking hormones, there was some suggestion that their breast cancer risk began to drop from peak levels, but the overall risk remained the same. The breast cancer data were said not to be statistically significant, suggesting chance could play a role. However, researchers say the trends are credible because they are consistent with previous research. Other data on cancer risk also failed to reach statistical significance. For instance, there was a suggestion that lung cancer risk was slightly higher among former hormone users, but that trend could also be due to chance. It was only after researchers combined all the data from various types of cancers that they were able to show a statistically significant difference between the former hormone users and those who had used placebos. It will be most interesting to see what develops in the medical community as a result of this study.
Source: Associated Press
- Baby's death results in lawsuit against Wal-Mart
- Auto repair shops win $15 million from insurer
- Jury awards former gymnastics coach $25.5 million
- OSHA fines Massachusetts firm over ice machine death
- Building Oaks of Righteousness
- Yaz litigation continues to grow
- Industrial Poultry Farming Operations Cause Problems for Residents
- Home Improvement Report Recalled by Oxmoor House
- Toyota has massive safety issues
- Chevrolet Cobalt Steering Complaints Being Investigated
- Living the Victorious Christian Life
- A Monthly Reminder
- A Bad Scene in Washington
- Pride Leads to Arrogance
- Favorite Bible Verse
- Nice Guys Don’t Always Finish Last
- A Message From Alabama State Bar President Tom Methvin
- March For Babies 2010 Coming Soon
- Valentine Cards Delivered to Brantwood
- LawCall Is Still Getting Lots of Attention
- Carol Stanley Works For TBI Victims
- My daughter who is in the US Navy drove approx.....5 hours from NJ on her way to...
- Thanks for all the information. I have intended to buy a Prius when I think it i...
- The case has not yet gone to court. We will continue to follow the case and pro...
- I think one of the most important things chemical reform can do to protect us is...
- Who won this case?...
- Any idea about final payment for for us less important stroke victims?
Thanx....
- Any word on litigation regarding Bayer's birth control implant Mirena?...
- I also was a former employee of Hallmark and was never notified of this lawsuit....
- Beasley Allen
- Legal Strategies
- Jere Beasley Report
- Extreme Montgomery
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Coal Ash Spill
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Serious Injuries
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Morgan Keegan Fraud
- Denied Disability
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Toyota Unintended Acceleration
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Yaz Side Effects
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Pain Pumps
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Lantus Attorney
- Vytorin Cancer
- Chantix Recall
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Fleet Attorney
- Heparin Recall
- Gardasil
- Reglan Lawyer
- Steven Johnson Syndrome
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Digitek Recall
- Antibiotics
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Trasylol Recall
- Fosamax and ONJ
- HRT and Breast Cancer
Recent Settlements - Sep 3, 2009 12:59 - 0 Comments
Wal-Mart parking lot case is settled
More In Recent Settlements
- Interstate death case settles
- Mississippi case involving man crushed by pipe won on appeal
- Death case settled in Troy, Alabama
- Oral Sodium Phosphate Litigation
- Road Rage case settles in an Alabama Court
Product Liability - Mar 4, 2010 10:08 - 0 Comments
Jury Awards Woman $23.4 Million Against Ford Motor Co.
More In Product Liability
- Ford Liable for Defective Fuel Tank
- Caterpiller must Pay $54 Million to Paralyzed Texas Worker
- Machine Hazards are a Serious Safety Risk for Workers
- Honda Adds Vehicled to Recall Over Airbags
- Our Firm Has Filed Three Class Actions Based on Behalf of Toyota Owners Affected by the Massive Recalls
Recalls Update - Mar 4, 2010 11:30 - 0 Comments
Innovage LLC Recalls Discovery Lamps for Children Due To Fire and Burn Hazards
More In Recalls Update
- Generation 2 Worldwide and “ChildESIGNS” Drop Side Crib Brands Recalled
- Products Made For Children in China Pulled From Stores in U.S.
- Chrysler to Fix Airbags in Some 355,500 Minivans
- Hyundai Issues Voluntary Recall on Sonata Sedan
- Honda Launches Recall to Repair Airbags
Leave a Reply