If done correctly, and not to achieve a desired result, frontal crash tests in laboratories are strong predictors relating to the safety of passenger cars on the road. But, the tests fail to accurately project driver fatality risks for trucks, according to a recent Virginia Commonwealth University study. The study examined the frontal crash test ratings that vehicles received from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and compared those ratings to fatality rates in the vehicles. It also compared a smaller sample of test ratings given by the privately funded Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), which uses a 40% frontal offset crash test, with the vehicles’ fatality rates.

The results indicate that the crash tests held by NHTSA and the IIHS are successful in predicting real-world crash outcomes for passenger cars — the ratings NHTSA and IIHS bestowed on passenger cars generally matched the cars’ safety record on the road. But, the ratings for trucks did not match real-world outcomes. For example, in the case of both NHTSA and IIHS, trucks that received the worst possible crash-test rating had on average lower driver fatality rates than trucks that received the best possible crash-test rating. Study co-author David Harless, professor of economics in the VCU School of Business, observed:

If you’re thinking about buying a passenger car, then the crash test scores can be useful to you. But if you are thinking of buying a truck, we have no evidence that the tests are meaningful in terms of real-world performance in serious crashes.

The study was published in the September issue of Accident Analysis & Prevention. The research was limited to instances of multiple crash tests in a given vehicle line, controlling for the differences in driver behavior in different lines of vehicles. The study examined the testing of vehicles in the 1987-2001 model years. It was pointed out that IIHS had fewer vehicle lines to review, because it did not begin its testing program until 1995. The study authors urged caution concerning their findings regarding the IIHS tests, particularly for trucks, because of the small sample of vehicle lines they were able to include in their research.

Questions have persisted over the years about the value of NHTSA’s frontal crash test ratings because of the difficulty of simulating a real-world crash in a laboratory setting. A very small percentage of automobile accidents mirror the circumstances of a direct head-to-head collision between vehicles of similar size – the scenario NHTSA creates in its lab tests. It’s said by most safety experts, however, that the government does as good a job as the private sector does at predicting the relative death rate for passenger cars.

Other Related Articles

• Comparison of the tests run by NHTSA and safety group
• Fewer 2010-model vehicles pass tougher safety tests
• NHTSA test of infant car seats reveal safety failures in crashes
• Four small SUVs earn top safety pick
• Revamped Vehicle Rating Program Still Has Glaring Omissions