The National Scene - Written by Scott Thomas on Wednesday, March 14, 2007 13:53 - 0 Comments
Exxon Valdez Oil Spill is Still Damaging Alaska’s Shoreline
A recent study reveals that Alaska is still being damaged by Exxon. Almost 18 years have passed since the tanker Exxon Valdez ran aground and fouled hundreds of miles of Alaska shoreline. Today, lingering crude from the nation’s largest oil spill has weathered only slightly in some places, according to a new federal study that was released recently. The estimated 85 tons – more than 26,600 gallons – of oil remaining at Prince William Sound are declining at a rate of only about 4% a year. The rate of decline is likely even slower in the Gulf of Alaska. At that rate of decline, oil could persist for decades below the surface of some beaches, according to the report. The study, by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, was published in Environmental Science & Technology, the journal of the American Chemical Society. Researchers wrote in their conclusion:
Such persistence can pose a contact hazard to intertidally foraging sea otters, sea ducks, and shorebirds, create a chronic source of low-level contamination, discourage subsistence in a region where use is heavy, and degrade the wilderness character of protected lands.
Many of us have forgotten what actually happened back in 1989 when the Exxon Valdez ran aground, emptying 11 million gallons of crude oil into Prince William Sound. The spill contaminated more than 1,200 miles of shoreline and killed hundreds of thousands of seabirds and marine animals. Earlier research from other spills had revealed that oil could hold toxins for years if embedded in oxygen-depleted sediments where minimal weather-caused disintegration occurs. In the Valdez spill study, researchers found that thick, emulsified oil – called “oil mousse” – resists weathering and thus can be preserved in oxygen-containing sediments.
As we have reported, Exxon still has not paid the punitive damage judgment, originally set for $5 billion by a federal jury in 1994. The case has been in the federal court system for over 12 years now. In December, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the powerful oil giant must pay $2.5 billion to compensate thousands of fishermen and others affected by the spill. Predictably, Exxon has asked the court to reconsider its decision.
John Devens, executive director of the Prince William Sound Regional Citizens’ Advisory Council, said Exxon’s prolonged stalling was “unconscionable” considering the social, economic and environmental damages. His observation about this politically powerful corporation pretty well sums things up:
It’s very difficult to understand why Exxon isn’t a better industrial citizen.
More and more folks around the country are beginning to share the same opinion about ExxonMobil as that of Mr. Devens and others who have dealt with this company. I can say, based on my personal experience with this company, that it has an arrogant corporate mentality with no respect for our country’s judicial system.
Sources: Houston Chronicle and Associated Press
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Extreme Montgomery
- Jere Beasley Report
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Coal Ash Spill
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Employee Rights
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Vytorin Cancer
- Pain Pumps
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Reglan Lawyer
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Chantix Recall
- Digitek Recall
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Heparin Recall
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Fleet Attorney
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Trasylol Recall
- Paxil and Pregnancy
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
Leave a Reply