Posts Tagged ‘federal trade commission’
The Consumer Corner - Friday, January 3, 2014 8:51 - 0 Comments
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against several U.S and Canadian based companies, alleging that these companies implemented a medical discount scam that targeted seniors across the country. According to the FTC’s complaint, seniors in the U.S. were victims of deceptive calls by telemarketers whereby they would offer phony discounts on prescription drugs and even pretend to be affiliated with Social Security, Medicare, or medical insurance providers.
As indicated in the FTC’s recent press release, the telemarketing calls pitched a prescription drug discount card that would supposedly provide substantially discounted or even free prescription drugs to seniors. Many victims were led to believe they had to purchase the card to continue receiving their Social Security, Medicare, or other medical insurance, which was not the case.
Additionally, the discount cards that these companies were selling were actually available for free by calling a toll-free number or visiting a website. Moreover, the discount cards generally do not provide any discounts to consumers who already have either governmental or private insurance. However, the FTC alleges that the telemarketers deceitfully convinced their victims to turn over their bank account numbers in order to purchase a discount card, and then used that information to debit money from the victims’ accounts.
The companies used the victims’ bank account information to take approximately $300 from their bank accounts using a “demand draft.” Moreover, not all consumers who paid for the purported discount card even received it – some victims received nothing at all for their money.
The FTC is actively working to shut down the medical discount scheme. Some of the companies responsible for the scheme include, but are not limited to, AFD Advisors, LLC; AMG Associates, LLC; CAL Consulting, LLC; Park 295 Corp., as well as Canadian companies 9262-2182 Quebec Inc. and 9210-7838 Quebec Inc. The companies, and certain officers of these companies, have been charged with violating Section 5 of the FTC Act by deceptively presenting themselves as government or insurance representatives, as well as by telling consumers that the discount plans they were selling could provide substantial discounts on prescription drugs.
Additionally, the companies, and certain officers of these companies, have been charged with violating the FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule for their deceptive acts and for calling consumers whose numbers were on the National Do Not Call Registry. A federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued a temporary restraining order halting the companies’ deceptive scheme and freezing their assets. The Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, Jessica Rich, stated:
This scam, which targeted and deceived our nation’s seniors, is as cynical and wanton as they come. We look forward to bringing this operation to a halt and working to get relief for the victims.
If any of our readers are aware of this type of fraud or deceit and need assistance, they can contact Ali Hawthorne, a lawyer in our firm’s Consumer Fraud Section, at 800-898-2034 or by email at Alison.Hawthorne@beasleyallen.com.
Source: Federal Trade Commission
- FTC Enforcement Action Against Debt Collector Ends in Record Settlement
- Bayer Agrees To $74 Million Settlement In Cipro Pay-For-Delay Case
- FTC Says One in 20 Credit Reports Have Errors
- The Federal Government Files Suit Against Wyndham Over Data Breach
- FTC Targets Car Dealers For Misleading Ads
- Antitrust Litigation
- Widow Harrassed By Collection Firm
- More Complaints Involving Aggressive Debt Collectors
- Reebok To Pay $25 Million To Consumers Over Shoe Claims
- An Overview Of Antitrust Litigation
- Countrywide To Pay $108 Million For Overcharging Struggling Homeowners
- FTC is looking into football helmet claims
- Lifelock Fraud Alert Firm To Pay $12 Million In Settlement
- Fraud in the prepaid calling card market
- Bear Stearns agrees to settle civil charges
- An Update on the Firm's Mass Torts Litigation
- Eight Car Makers Join in the Recall of Exploding Airbags
- The Deepwater Horizon Claims Program is Up and Running Again
- Favorite Bible Verses
- J&J Pays Oregon $4 Million To Settle Hip Implant Marketing Claims
- MF Global Officers’ Defense Cost Already At $48 Million
- GSK Fined Record $489 Million For Bribery In China
- Bank Of America’s Mortgage Backed Securities Settlement Is The Most Consumer Friendly Deal Struck Thus Far
- Alabama Supreme Court Affirms Class-Action Status For $3.2 Billion Investor Lawsuit Against CVS Caremark
- U.S. Senate Confirms Jill Pryor To 11th Circuit
- Alabama Campaigns Move Slowly Towards November
- The National Scene Begins To Generate Interest
- United Kingdom’s Government Backs BP
- U.S. Chamber Sides With Foreign Oil Company Over Its Own Members
- Halliburton Reaches Settlement On Claims
- A Confirmation Of Judge Barbier’s Ruling That BP Was Grossly Negligent
- So what is happening on this was it corrected because my husband is also on this...
- J P Morgan / Chase wasted days of my time arguing about flood insurance on my lo...
- My husband contracted polio from the vaccine around 1962. He was left with left ...
- I bought my f350 from our local ford 2 years ago it had 140000 on it in the firs...
- I have worked for dollar general for 14 1/2 years. sept 29th me and my whole cre...
- I had the same ignition problem where the car would not turn off on my 2007 HHR ...
- my recall was just preformed and power steering has gone out. are these two issu...
- I would like to know if I have A case that your firm would take on. I had severe...