Posts Tagged ‘Environmental’
Environmental Concerns - Friday, May 11, 2012 14:00 - 0 Comments
A coalition of environmental groups has filed a lawsuit to force the Obama Administration to finalize new rules regulating the containment and disposal of coal ash, a power plant byproduct that many believe threatens public health. I happen to be in that group. Earthjustice, the Sierra Club, the Environmental Integrity Project, and several other groups want the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize coal ash standards the agency proposed after a massive and expensive 2008 spill. The groups filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. A lawyer for Earthjustice, Lisa Evans, had this to say in a statement:
It is well past time the EPA acts on promises made years ago to protect the nation from coal ash contamination and life-threatening coal ash ponds.
The EPA proposed regulating coal ash, or byproducts of coal combustion in power plants, in 2010, after the spill at a storage site at a Tennessee Valley Authority power plant. Our firm had been heavily engaged in litigation relating to that disaster. The 2008 accident caused a flood of sludge for which cleanup was estimated to cost more than $1 billion. Environmental groups contend that coal ash disposal can lead to groundwater contamination from improperly built storage ponds and landfills. The EPA has said contaminants such as mercury, arsenic and cadmium in coal ash could cause cancer if they get into the water supply.
Earthjustice has released data obtained from the EPA that shows previously unknown instances of contaminated groundwater at 29 U.S. power plants. The report shows arsenic, lead and other pollutants in water near the coal-fired plants. Ms. Evans stated:
When plants are monitoring they’re generally, much more often than not, finding the contamination. Which then, of course, begs the question of, why aren’t there federal protections to stop this contamination?
Some Republicans in Congress have attacked the EPA, accusing the agency of a war on coal-fired power plants due to new emissions rules. The EPA has proposed two versions of the coal ash rules. One version would be tougher on existing facilities. But both versions would require liners and groundwater monitoring at new storage sites.
The final rules are expected during the summer. But Ms. Evans believes that the EPA should to set a hard deadline to finish the project. Lawmakers from both parties have criticized the proposed changes. Some say regulating coal ash would stifle industries that use recycled waste. In a letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson in 2010, 35 senators contended that the proposal would place unfair burdens on utilities and could cost jobs. The U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill in October that would hand the responsibility for regulating coal ash disposal to the states. A bipartisan group of senators backed the bill, but attention relating to the bill was short-lived. I have a hard time believing the states – with their limited resources – should have to take on this added burden. A national approach seems to be better suited for regulating coal ash in this country.
- Smelters Expose Communities To Toxic Levels Of Lead
- $2.3 Million Jury Verdict Returned For Plaintiffs Harmed By Landfill
- Environmental Group Identifies Ten States With Coal Ash Pollutants
- Canada Pulls Out Of Kyoto Climate Change Protocol
- Brazil Files $10.6 Billion Lawsuit Against Chevron And Transocean Over Oil Spill
- Offshore Oil Bosses Fought New Safety Improvements
- Asbestos cleanup emergency declared in Montana town
- Krispy Kreme sued for clogging sewer system
- New appraisal finds elevated health risks related to soot particles
- Update on TVA coal ash spill
- Texas suing BP for pollution violations
- Update on toxic sewage sludge contamination
- W.R. Grace and three executives acquitted in asbestos case
- Modesto awarded $18 million in groundwater lawsuit
- Chevron USA accused of hiding massive asphalt oil spill in Alabama
- U.S. Supreme Court limits liability over toxic spill cases
- EPA restores stricter reporting of toxic pollution
- Update in hot fuel litigation
- Class action filed in Florida arising out of the Stanford Ponzi Scheme
- Jere Beasley Report, April 2013
- Alabama to Receive $1,039,078 in Multi-State Settlement
- COSTCO Recalls Gold Coast Crab Dip
- Major Banks Assist In Payday Loans Banned By States
- Marc McHenry Hired As Investigator
- We Have Allowed A Culture Of Violence To Be Created In The U.S.
- Parting Words
- Closing Observations
- Favorite Bible Verses
- WSFA News Defenders Interviews
- Beasley Allen Hosts The Child Safety Helmet Giveaway
- SPLC Looks At How Payday And Title Loans Prey On Alabama’s Poorest
- Employee Spotlights
- Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods
- Winn-Dixie Recalls Organic Apple Juice On Mold Fears
- Manda Packing Recalling 468,000 Pounds Of Meat
- Carter’s Recalls Infant Clothings With Zippers Due To Choking Hazard
- I want to be involved in this lawsuit. I was a 3rd key making $8.25 per hour wi...
- Great to find a site like this that informs us of what our tax dollars are payin...
- can you please emaik me a copy of your article on april 16th wells fargo suid f...
- ALL OF THESE STORIES ARE SIMILAR AND ALMOAT THE SAME IN TIME FRAMES. FOR TWO YEA...
- they tried forexloaing on my home with a fraudulent note. how do I know that? I ...
- Yes, Sharon, we were aware of the button... however, it didn't work. Took it to...
- When would we get paid?...
- Would like to know how much longer will it be before we get paid....