Posts Tagged ‘Bill Hopkins’
Securities Litigation - Thursday, December 27, 2012 9:50 - 0 Comments
On November 5, 2012, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Amgen, Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans & Trust Funds. Amgen, Inc. is a large pharmaceutical corporation based in California. The Food and Drug Administration approved two Amgen products that stimulate production of red blood cells and reduce the need for blood transfusions in anemic patients. Amgen allegedly made misrepresentations to the FDA about the safety of these products. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds brought an action against Amgen alleging misrepresentation on the part of the corporation and certain officers.
Specifically, the Trust alleged that Amgen and certain officers misrepresented the nature of several FDA Committee meetings to shareholders and that when certain facts became public, it caused a dramatic decrease in the stock price for Amgen. On May 10, 2007, when certain information became public, Amgen stock value dropped by more than nine percent.
Amgen opposed the class certification, arguing that the misrepresentations allegedly made did not have any impact on Amgen stock. The district court rejected Amgen’s arguments and granted the Trust’s motion for class certification. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, rejecting Amgen’s argument that a Plaintiff must give proof that the misrepresentations were material at the class certification stage rather than only at the trial.
The two questions to be decided by the Supreme Court are whether the district court must require proof of materiality before certifying the class action based on the fraud-upon-the-market theory in a misrepresentation case; and whether the district court must allow Amgen to present evidence rebutting the applicability of the fraud-upon-the-market theory before certifying the class. The thrust of this case is really what facts need to be decided before a class action certification decision may be made. Whatever the ruling, the Court will probably make an important statement about the role of factual inquiry and proof for class certification. A decision is not expected before the end of the year. If you need more information on this case or on securities litigation generally, contact Bill Hopkins, a lawyer in our firm who handles securities and class action litigation, at 800-898-2034 or by email at Bill.Hopkins@beasleyallen.com.
- Jere Beasley Report, April 2013
- Marc McHenry Hired As Investigator
- Title Loans and Payday Loans are Bad News for Borrowers
- Alabama to Receive $1,039,078 in Multi-State Settlement
- COSTCO Recalls Gold Coast Crab Dip
- Major Banks Assist In Payday Loans Banned By States
- We Have Allowed A Culture Of Violence To Be Created In The U.S.
- Parting Words
- Closing Observations
- Favorite Bible Verses
- WSFA News Defenders Interviews
- Beasley Allen Hosts The Child Safety Helmet Giveaway
- SPLC Looks At How Payday And Title Loans Prey On Alabama’s Poorest
- Employee Spotlights
- Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods
- Winn-Dixie Recalls Organic Apple Juice On Mold Fears
- Manda Packing Recalling 468,000 Pounds Of Meat
- Carter’s Recalls Infant Clothings With Zippers Due To Choking Hazard
- Its really not easy to payback any kind of loan, I always recommend all my frien...
- Same as above, with all the nightmares. I was Modifying with Wells Fargo and i s...
- I am shocked to see what I am reading - but not surprised. I installed Certain...
- I work as a store manager and i work 60 to ninety hours a weeks please tell me s...
- I wondered why i couldn't find him on the DPS website.
Tell Marc to contact me...
- I want to be involved in this lawsuit. I was a 3rd key making $8.25 per hour wi...
- Great to find a site like this that informs us of what our tax dollars are payin...
- can you please emaik me a copy of your article on april 16th wells fargo suid f...