Arbitration Update - Wednesday, March 5, 2014 9:42 - 1 Comment
The claims in a class action lawsuit against Dell Inc. were sent to arbitration last month in a New Jersey federal court. Judge Michael A. Shipp granted a request from Dell and ordered the Plaintiff who had filed a proposed class action lawsuit, alleging the company sells defective laptops prone to overheating, to enter arbitration with the computer giant. A stay of Plaintiff Raheel Ahmad Khan’s claims was issued and he was ordered to participate in the arbitration sessions. The judge cited the terms of an agreement the Plaintiff consented to when he purchased his Inspiron 600m computer.
Lawyers from the two sides had been at odds over the enforceability of the agreement, which Khan entered when he clicked a box on Dell’s website indicating that he had read and understood the terms and conditions of sale for the $1,200 device. The agreement contained a provision requiring any disputes arising over the agreement to be exclusively arbitrated through the National Arbitration Forum. By the time Khan’s suit was filed in July 2009, however, the NAF was no longer accepting consumer arbitration.
Interestingly, a motion filed by Dell seeking to force Khan into arbitration was denied by the court in 2010 due to the NAF’s unavailability. In early 2012, however, the Third Circuit reversed that ruling, saying the law allowed for an alternative party to be assigned to the case. When the case came back, Judge Shipp wrote in that issue:
Faced with a divide in relevant case law outside the Third Circuit, the court determined that the parties could substitute another arbitral body for NAF.
The Plaintiff argued that forcing individuals into arbitration against a large company like Dell puts him at a clear disadvantage because Dell has litigated various similar disputes in the past, which allows the company to make “an informed, calculated decision about how to proceed.” The Plaintiff also argued that various other portions of the agreement were legally unconscionable, including its ability to force Plaintiffs to attend arbitration sessions in Texas at their own expense, and the lack of opportunity for customers to object or refuse its terms if they chose to purchase the computer. Judge Shipp rejected all of these arguments.
The Plaintiff filed the class action on behalf of everyone who has leased or purchased a Dell Inspiron 600m notebook laptop computer. According to the Plaintiff, the 600m suffers from a design defect that makes it overheat after as little as 15 minutes of normal use. He alleged that overheating makes the machines’ processors run at dramatically lower speeds, rendering the computers unusable for the intended purpose, and leads to vital system components failing. The case is a classic example of how huge corporations take advantage of their customers.
- Vonage Denied Arbitration Due To “One-Sided” Service Terms
- Arbitration In Nursing Homes
- Hearings Address The Evils Of Forced Arbitration
- Judge Refuses To Send Defective Phone Class Action To Arbitration
- Hyundai Takes Arbitration Out Of Their Warranty Contracts
- Hope For Consumers Seeking To Avoid Arbitration
- U.S. Appeals Court Changes A Decision On Car Arbitration
- Toyota Not Allowed To Arbitrate Sudden Acceleration Claims
- Arbitration Clauses In Consumer Contracts Targeted
- Bank Of America Takes Arbitration Out Of Credit Cards
- U.S. Supreme Court Grants Review of Class Action Waiver Case
- Congress Takes Major Step Toward Ending Forced Arbitration
- A Seminar On Arbitration
- Congress should act on arbitration legislation
- Congress should act on pending legislation
- Bank of America drops arbitration for consumer disputes
- Report on the Arbitration Fairness Act
- Arbitration ordered in suit over death at BP plant
- Testosterone Multidistrict Litigation Has Been Formed
- Exploding Airbags is the Next Hidden Danger Lurking on the Horizon
- Favorite Bible Verses
- An Update on the Firm's Mass Torts Litigation
- The Civil Justice System Does Make a Difference
- BP's Stay Request Fails Before the Supreme Court
- Eight Car Makers Join in the Recall of Exploding Airbags
- The Deepwater Horizon Claims Program is Up and Running Again
- Favorite Bible Verses
- J&J Pays Oregon $4 Million To Settle Hip Implant Marketing Claims
- EPA Should Update Fracking Pollution Regulations
- Deepwater Fracking Raises Environmental Concerns
- $27.8 Million Settlement Finalized In TVA Coal Ash Spill
- Illinois Transport Company Settles Fatal Crash Suit For $2.7 Million
- Settlement For Family Of College Student Killed In Crash After Alabama National Championship Game
- Macy’s Fined $1 Million For Decapitation Of Warehouse Employee
- Texas Plastics Plant Fined $174,000 For Safety And Health Violations
- OSHA Says Safety Violation Continue At Oklahoma Oil Refinery
- Company Cited In Fatal West Virginia Cell Tower Collapse
- New Safety Directive Issued By OSHA On Communication Tower Work
- $27 Million Verdict Returned In Texas Against McDonald’s
- I keep reading that the pratice of steering is illegal and whole-heartidly suppo...
- Hello William, thank you for your question. We are not aware of any pending liti...
- Has litigation commenced as a result of this recall?...
- Sorry I meant to say settlement papers, but I did speak to someone in the Lawyer...
- I just spoke to someone and was told it will be another month or two before I wi...
- 2005 F150 super cab. Driver side regulator just broke. Dealer wants $200 just fo...
- Today, the 4th window failed in my 2004 F-150 SuperCrew - I bought it new and th...
- I own a 2007 Chevy HHR . Gauges have been going hey wire for about for about 5 m...