Arbitration Update - Wednesday, March 5, 2014 9:42 - 1 Comment
The claims in a class action lawsuit against Dell Inc. were sent to arbitration last month in a New Jersey federal court. Judge Michael A. Shipp granted a request from Dell and ordered the Plaintiff who had filed a proposed class action lawsuit, alleging the company sells defective laptops prone to overheating, to enter arbitration with the computer giant. A stay of Plaintiff Raheel Ahmad Khan’s claims was issued and he was ordered to participate in the arbitration sessions. The judge cited the terms of an agreement the Plaintiff consented to when he purchased his Inspiron 600m computer.
Lawyers from the two sides had been at odds over the enforceability of the agreement, which Khan entered when he clicked a box on Dell’s website indicating that he had read and understood the terms and conditions of sale for the $1,200 device. The agreement contained a provision requiring any disputes arising over the agreement to be exclusively arbitrated through the National Arbitration Forum. By the time Khan’s suit was filed in July 2009, however, the NAF was no longer accepting consumer arbitration.
Interestingly, a motion filed by Dell seeking to force Khan into arbitration was denied by the court in 2010 due to the NAF’s unavailability. In early 2012, however, the Third Circuit reversed that ruling, saying the law allowed for an alternative party to be assigned to the case. When the case came back, Judge Shipp wrote in that issue:
Faced with a divide in relevant case law outside the Third Circuit, the court determined that the parties could substitute another arbitral body for NAF.
The Plaintiff argued that forcing individuals into arbitration against a large company like Dell puts him at a clear disadvantage because Dell has litigated various similar disputes in the past, which allows the company to make “an informed, calculated decision about how to proceed.” The Plaintiff also argued that various other portions of the agreement were legally unconscionable, including its ability to force Plaintiffs to attend arbitration sessions in Texas at their own expense, and the lack of opportunity for customers to object or refuse its terms if they chose to purchase the computer. Judge Shipp rejected all of these arguments.
The Plaintiff filed the class action on behalf of everyone who has leased or purchased a Dell Inspiron 600m notebook laptop computer. According to the Plaintiff, the 600m suffers from a design defect that makes it overheat after as little as 15 minutes of normal use. He alleged that overheating makes the machines’ processors run at dramatically lower speeds, rendering the computers unusable for the intended purpose, and leads to vital system components failing. The case is a classic example of how huge corporations take advantage of their customers.
- Vonage Denied Arbitration Due To “One-Sided” Service Terms
- Arbitration In Nursing Homes
- Hearings Address The Evils Of Forced Arbitration
- Judge Refuses To Send Defective Phone Class Action To Arbitration
- Hyundai Takes Arbitration Out Of Their Warranty Contracts
- Hope For Consumers Seeking To Avoid Arbitration
- U.S. Appeals Court Changes A Decision On Car Arbitration
- Toyota Not Allowed To Arbitrate Sudden Acceleration Claims
- Arbitration Clauses In Consumer Contracts Targeted
- Bank Of America Takes Arbitration Out Of Credit Cards
- U.S. Supreme Court Grants Review of Class Action Waiver Case
- Congress Takes Major Step Toward Ending Forced Arbitration
- A Seminar On Arbitration
- Congress should act on arbitration legislation
- Congress should act on pending legislation
- Bank of America drops arbitration for consumer disputes
- Report on the Arbitration Fairness Act
- Arbitration ordered in suit over death at BP plant
- $3.3 Million Verdict Against TRW In Faulty Air Bag Lawsuit
- Deepwater Horizon Economic Settlement Program Trying to Make Up for Lost Time
- An Explanation of How Beasley Allen is Structured
- The Eighth Annual Beasley Allen Legal Conference
- More On Ionization Smoke Detectors
- NHTSA Considers Vehicle Electronics Rule
- Continental Recalls 170,000 Defective Motorcycle Tires
- Virginia Woman Paralyzed In Miata Car Crash Awarded $20 Million
- Bessemer Jury Returns $9.9 Million Verdict In Mazda Fire Case
- Defrauding The Military Is All Too Common
- JPMorgan Fined $78 Million By The European Commission
- $28 Million Verdict Upheld In Wyoming Carbon Monoxide Case
- Judge Vance Lifts Temporary Restraining Order Preventing Publication Of Alagasco Documents
- HI, just want to notify you of a change of address.
- Same thing happened too my 17 yr old in an 08 kia rio...
- I too was scammed by Flagstar Bank. I tried to get a modification on my mortgag...
- I have a 2004 F-150 XLT which I purchased new in Jan. 2004. The truck has only ...
- Deuy lawsuit. I have been reading , on internet, that lawsuits filed after Augu...
- Had to contact and comment on the MTD log splitter recall. There should be a sta...
- A couple month ago, 2010 Cobalt had ignition switch & keys replace per recal...
- trying to get a update on the lawsuite