A state Judge in Santa Clara County, Calif., has ordered three lead paint companies to pay $1.1 billion into a fund to be used to remove the lead in hundreds of thousands of homes in 10 cities and counties in California. The verdict came after 13 years of litigation and five weeks of trial. Judge James P. Kleinberg said that lead in paint, for which there is no safe level of exposure for children, results in “thousands of children presently and potentially victimized by this chemical.” The counties are San Francisco, Alameda, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Los Angeles, Monterey, Solano and Ventura, and the cities are Oakland and San Diego.
Mary Alexander, the lead lawyer who tried the case for the cities and counties, said that “this verdict will prevent lead poisoning of children from paint in their homes.” Clearly, it was a great victory for the people of California. The Judge ordered Sherwin-Williams, ConAgra and NL Industries, formerly known as the National Lead Co., to pay $1.1 billion to establish a fund that the state will administer to remove lead paint from the homes in the 10 cities and counties. There are 4.7 million homes built before 1978 when lead paint was banned, of which 52 percent have lead paint.
Each year, thousands of children younger than 6 years of age are lead poisoned, most of them exposed to lead through lead paint in their homes. Lead paint deteriorates over time leaving paint chips and dust that gets on floors, window sills and toys to which young children are exposed. Lead poisoning causes damage to the brain and nervous systems of children and it is permanent and irreversible. The impact is particularly great in minorities and children living in poor housing. An internal industry document by Sherwin Williams in 1900 described the paint ingredient white lead as a “deadly cumulative poison.”
In 1909, a California Supreme Court case held that ConAgra was responsible for lead poisoning in its own lead plant employees. Despite this knowledge the companies continued to promote the sale of lead paint in the California cities and counties. Ms. Alexander said:
This decision holds the companies accountable for promoting and selling lead paint for use in homes despite knowing, as far back as the 1890s, that it was highly toxic, especially to young children. This landmark decision recognizes the manufacturers must be held responsible and pay to clean up the hazard they created in homes.
Other lawyers for the Plaintiffs were Cotchett, Pitre and McCarthy; Motley Rice; the Law Offices of Peter Earle, and Danny Cho, Assistant County Attorney for Santa Clara. Danny Chou described the abatement ruling as a “huge victory for children in this jurisdiction.” These lawyers did a tremendous job in this case. I agree with their assessment of its impact.
Contact us today for a free legal consultation with an experienced attorney.
Fields marked *may be required for submission.
If you would like to subscribe to the Jere Beasley Report digital edition, simply visit our Subscriptions page and provide the necessary information or call us at 800-898-2034.
Attorney Advertising - Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.