Much has been written in the national media about the crash of an Asiana airlines plane in California on July 6. The plane crashed upon touchdown at San Francisco International Airport (SFO), killing three and injuring some 180 others. It was reported recently by the San Francisco Chronicle that SFO officials and other aviation authorities were concerned about Asiana Airlines’ unusually high rate of aborted landings or “go-arounds” at SFO.
The incident, and Asiana’s poor SFO landing record, underscore what aviation officials say is a big disparity between U.S. aviation safety standards and those of most other countries. According to a Los Angeles Times report, “a wide range of U.S. aviation experts” believe that “the United States and a handful of European nations, by a wide margin, have better-trained pilots, more sophisticated regulatory agencies that closely monitor operations, and airlines that vastly exceed minimum government requirements.” The Los Angeles Times report made this observation:
Although all commercial airlines that fly into the U.S. must meet minimum international standards, only a few rise to the same level as the domestic industry.
In Asiana’s case, one deficiency may be in pilot training requirements. Some U.S. aviation experts contend that the crash of Asiana 214 and the operator’s poor SFO-landing record indicate that its pilots may be too dependent on automatic controls and not adequately trained to land an airplane manually. It’s a necessity that pilots be fully trained on landing commercial planes manually. Any deficiency of skill in operating an airplane manually could spell disaster, especially in takeoff and landing procedures, which are more complicated and require greater skill than autopilot may provide.
Investigators are still trying to understand why the three pilots aboard Asiana 214 failed to notice the airplane’s improper landing speed and altitude until it was too late. So far, according to reports, they have found no evidence that the Boeing 777 had any electronic or mechanical problems that could have contributed to the disaster. That means the training, experience and qualifications of Asiana 214’s pilots remain at the center of the investigation. Asiana Airlines claims that it meets or exceeds U.S. and international standards, but company officials have said they are “in the process of reexamining our procedures and training.”
Of the nearly 300 aviation crashes worldwide involving large passenger airplanes since 1990, according to the LA Times, 87 percent involved foreign carriers. That’s most significant considering they represent a substantially smaller share of air traffic. The Federal Aviation Administration has restricted or banned airlines from 23 countries from entering U.S. airspace. Most of the banned airlines are based in Asia and Africa.
Sources: The San Francisco Chronicle and the Los Angeles Times
Contact us today for a free legal consultation with an experienced attorney.
Fields marked *may be required for submission.
If you would like to subscribe to the Jere Beasley Report digital edition, simply visit our Subscriptions page and provide the necessary information or call us at 800-898-2034.
Attorney Advertising - Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.