The Consumer Corner - Written by Beasley Allen on Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:59 - 3 Comments

Class Action Suit Filed Over Cochlear Hearing Implants

A has been filed alleging that cracks in the hermetic seal of cochlear hearing implants allow bodily fluid to seep in, causing the devices to fail. The devices are surgically implanted in a patient’s head and, together with an external behind-the-ear device, send electrical energy to a patient’s hearing nerves to produce sound. The Cochlear CI500 series implants were pulled from the market in a global recall in September of last year.

Scott A. Morgan, the Chicago-based who filed the , believes that approximately 25,000 devices have been implanted in patients, but he declined to estimate how big the class will be. The device is made by Australian company Cochlear Limited. The named Plaintiff in the suit, filed on April 18 in Illinois federal court, is Wyle Wade, father of a two-year-old daughter, K.W., who had a cochlear device implanted behind each ear at an out-of-pocket cost of $75,000.

The suit alleges strict , negligence and breach of warranty. It seeks damages for the cost of the implants, then for removing them and replacing them with older models that did not have cracks, as well as punitive damages. The suit also asks for medical monitoring for Plaintiffs who have been implanted with the recalled devices. The Plaintiffs lived in India when the devices were implanted and service of the complaint is being made through The Hague.

An individual against a different manufacturer, Advanced Bionics, alleges similar problems with its implant, the HiRes 90k implant. That suit, brought by the parents of Breanna Sadler, was filed in federal court in Kentucky. It alleges the child had to undergo risky open-head surgery to remove a defective implant that took in moisture. The action for , negligence and fraud seeks $3 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitives.

Source: Lawyers USA online



3 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

crystal
Jul 23, 2012 11:10

I am a parent of a re implanted child. His nucleus 5 failed on his left side last November. Mayo clinic and Cochler were very fast acting and did well in fixing what happened. My little man was only 2 and it really hurt to see him go threw it all again. But Cochler covered every cost we spent to be there. Class suits are great and for the people seeking money. But I believe this company is great. They invented the devices that now let my little boy talk. I know they screwed something up. But what place doesn’t. They didn’t try to hide it. They gave me a letter 3 months before my childs implant failed stating the recall. And they warn you it could happen before even before he became implanted the 1st time. A 2.% rate of failer is very low. Even if they could give me $1,000,000.00 right now I would not take it. Its wonderful my child can even say ” I love u mama” I have them to thank.

Guy
Aug 10, 2012 10:23

That 2% rate has now risen to well over 4%.

Guy 2
May 23, 2013 1:35

The rate has now risen to over 6%

Leave a Reply

Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

Powered by WP Hashcash

Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments

Settlement In BTSI Defect Case

More In Recent Settlements


Liability, Personal Injury, Product Liability - May 2, 2013 8:56 - 0 Comments

Kentucky Jury Awards Significant Damages In Defective Cochlear Implant Case

More In Product Liability


Recalls Update - May 3, 2013 9:23 - 0 Comments

Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods

More In Recalls Update