Featured, Product Liability - Written by Beasley Allen on Wednesday, June 6, 2012 12:46 - 1 Comment
A Report On Saw-Related Injuries
It has been reported that table saws, band saws, radial arm saws and miter saws are responsible for thousands of injuries each year to their users. Table saws alone account for approximately 40,000 injuries per year. According to the National Consumer League, table saws cause more than ten amputations every day. Table saw injuries cost more than $2 billion a year in medical costs to victims. Given the costs of treatment and the pain/suffering inflicted on the victims and their families, any and all safety improvements that can reduce or eliminate these injuries should be implemented.
Table saws are sold with removable guards. While these guards can be effective in preventing some injuries, the guards do not prevent all injury events. A Consumer Product Safety Commission report found that as many as a third of all table saw injuries happen with the guard in place. Many times, the guards are removed for operational convenience. Other times, the guards are removed to make certain cuts but are not re-installed afterwards. Either way, table saw manufacturers know that their guards are removed regularly.
Most would be surprised to know that technology which can prevent all amputations and injuries, whether the guard is in place or not, has been available to table saw manufacturers since November of 2000. SawStop technology will stop a table saw blade within milliseconds of contacting human skin. This technology is effective and to date there has not been a single documented injury with this technology in place. Unfortunately, table saw manufacturers have resisted this amazing technology, arguing costs.
Table saw manufacturers’ reluctance to adopt this technology belies common sense and good business practices. Studies have estimated that table saws equipped with this new technology cost approximately $100 more than the same saw without the technology. We believe that an increased cost of $100 is acceptable, especially when one considers the elimination of deaths and amputations, savings in medical treatment, the elimination of the pain, emotional trauma and permanent disfigurement associated with these injuries.
Kendall Dunson, a lawyer in our firm, recently filed a case against a major table saw manufacturer. In that case, our client sustained a serious hand injury on a table saw. SawStop technology would have prevented his injury. On October 5, 2011, the CPSC voted 5-0 to consider a national table saw safety standard. The industry has and will frustrate this process of adopting a national saw safety standard. If a national saw safety standard is ever implemented, the industry will spend millions making it as weak as possible. In the meantime, thousands will continue to be unnecessarily maimed.
Hopefully, brave consumers like our client will continue to come forward and push the industry through litigation to do the right thing and implement proven technology that will prevent thousands of unnecessary injuries and the associated costs. We will update you on the progress of this case. If you need additional information on this subject, contact Kendall Dunson at 800-898-2034 or by email at Kendall.Dunson@beasleyallen.com.
1 Comment
Lee Storesund
Leave a Reply
- Jere Beasley Report, April 2013
- Alabama to Receive $1,039,078 in Multi-State Settlement
- COSTCO Recalls Gold Coast Crab Dip
- Major Banks Assist In Payday Loans Banned By States
- Marc McHenry Hired As Investigator
- We Have Allowed A Culture Of Violence To Be Created In The U.S.
- Parting Words
- Closing Observations
- Favorite Bible Verses
- WSFA News Defenders Interviews
- Beasley Allen Hosts The Child Safety Helmet Giveaway
- SPLC Looks At How Payday And Title Loans Prey On Alabama’s Poorest
- Employee Spotlights
- Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods
- Winn-Dixie Recalls Organic Apple Juice On Mold Fears
- Manda Packing Recalling 468,000 Pounds Of Meat
- Carter’s Recalls Infant Clothings With Zippers Due To Choking Hazard
- I want to be involved in this lawsuit. I was a 3rd key making $8.25 per hour wi...
- Great to find a site like this that informs us of what our tax dollars are payin...
- can you please emaik me a copy of your article on april 16th wells fargo suid f...
- ALL OF THESE STORIES ARE SIMILAR AND ALMOAT THE SAME IN TIME FRAMES. FOR TWO YEA...
- they tried forexloaing on my home with a fraudulent note. how do I know that? I ...
- Yes, Sharon, we were aware of the button... however, it didn't work. Took it to...
- When would we get paid?...
- Would like to know how much longer will it be before we get paid....
Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments
Settlement In BTSI Defect Case
More In Recent Settlements
- A Further Update On The AWP Litigation
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Fort McClellan Radio Tower Collapse Case
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Sikorsky Helicopter Crash
- The Philadelphia Story
- St. Croix, Virgin Islands Settlement
Liability, Personal Injury, Product Liability - May 2, 2013 8:56 - 0 Comments
Kentucky Jury Awards Significant Damages In Defective Cochlear Implant Case
More In Product Liability
- Colorado Jury Finds Helmet Maker Riddell At Fault
- Remington Model 700 Misfires
- Submersion Lawsuit Highlights Escape Design Gaps
- Ford Ordered To Pay Driver $3 Million For Injuries In 2009 Crash
- Court Upholds $33 Million Verdict In Fatal Van Rollover Against Cooper Tire
Recalls Update - May 3, 2013 9:23 - 0 Comments
Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods
More In Recalls Update
- Winn-Dixie Recalls Organic Apple Juice On Mold Fears
- Manda Packing Recalling 468,000 Pounds Of Meat
- Carter’s Recalls Infant Clothings With Zippers Due To Choking Hazard
- Small World Toys Recalls Spin-A-Mals Farm And Safari Puzzles
- Infant Froggy Socks Sold At Cracker Barrel Recalled
As a woodworker I feel a need to comment.
First, that this could be an upgrade for about $100 is absolutely ridiculous.
Sawstop was designed by a lawyer who, from the get-go, tried to legislate his technology mandatory.
The least expensive version of the Sawstop is about $1600.00. The average similar non-Sawstop saw is less than $500.00.
Just because you CAN make a machine perfectly safe does not mean that you can require everybody to buy said safe machine.
If the saw is used in a commercial enterprise induce the company to buy the saw by reducing insurance premiums.
I believe that there was a school system in CO that paid for the saws by the reduced insurance premiums.
Serves a double benefit by allowing schools that have dropped industrial arts because of the high insurance liability costs to pay for the re-introduction of a needed trade.
Lee Storesund
Marietta, GA