Mass Torts Update - Written by Beasley Allen on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 15:03 - 0 Comments
An Update On The Pradaxa Litigation
Approved by the FDA in October 2010, Pradaxa (Dabigatran) is marketed by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., to reduce the risk of strokes and blood clots in people who have atrial fibrillation, a common heart rhythm abnormality. Pradaxa is in a class of anticoagulant medications known as “blood thinners.” Pradaxa is a direct thrombin inhibitor. It prevents the formation of blood clots by counteracting the effects of thrombin, which is responsible for clotting. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals markets Pradaxa as the preferred blood thinner. According to Boehringer, it is easier to dose, requires less monitoring, and is more effective at preventing clots compared to Warfarin (Coumadin). However, unlike Warfarin, Pradaxa’s anticoagulation effect cannot be reversed with vitamin K, significantly increasing the odds that a bleeding event will turn fatal.
As you may know, atrial fibrillation is the most common heart rhythm condition. Patients with this condition typically require blood-thinning medications. Warfarin is one such blood-thinner that is commonly used. Pradaxa is the first alternative to that drug. In November 2010 the drug manufacturer confirmed at least 260 fatal bleeding events in patients taking Pradaxa.
Pradaxa side effects have prompted safety advisories in Japan and Australia and have led to labeling updates in Europe and the United States. The FDA recently required the German pharmaceutical manufacturer Boehringer Ingelheim to update its Pradaxa label after receiving a large number of adverse event reports from consumers. The January 2012 label change added minimal information regarding the dangers of bleeding events and the lack of a reversal agent for Pradaxa.
To date, there have been significant numbers of fatal bleeds reported to the FDA. The lack of a reversal agent is believed to be the cause of the significant number of bleeding-related adverse events. While various reports have linked 260 bleeding deaths to Pradaxa, Boehringer, in an official statement on November 2, 2011, linked about 50 bleeding deaths to Pradaxa, which Boehringer asserted is consistent with expectations from the Pradaxa clinical trials. Earlier this year, the FDA required Boehringer to modify the Pradaxa warning label to reflect the lack of a reversal agent, which, amazingly, had not been included in the original warnings. The FDA is currently evaluating the reports of bleeding deaths and investigating whether the rate of severe bleeding reports is higher than what was seen in the Pradaxa clinical trials. At this point, there is no black box warning for Pradaxa.
If you or someone you care about took Pradaxa and suffered a personal injury or died, you may have a pharmaceutical defect claim against the manufacturer of Pradaxa. We are currently investigating claims of serious injuries and deaths involving Pradaxa. If you need additional information or would like for us to review your potential claim, please contact Roger Smith, a lawyer in our Mass Torts Section, by way of email at Roger.Smith@BeasleyAllen.com or call him at 800-898-2034.
- Jere Beasley Report, April 2013
- Marc McHenry Hired As Investigator
- Alabama to Receive $1,039,078 in Multi-State Settlement
- COSTCO Recalls Gold Coast Crab Dip
- Major Banks Assist In Payday Loans Banned By States
- We Have Allowed A Culture Of Violence To Be Created In The U.S.
- Parting Words
- Closing Observations
- Favorite Bible Verses
- WSFA News Defenders Interviews
- Beasley Allen Hosts The Child Safety Helmet Giveaway
- SPLC Looks At How Payday And Title Loans Prey On Alabama’s Poorest
- Employee Spotlights
- Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods
- Winn-Dixie Recalls Organic Apple Juice On Mold Fears
- Manda Packing Recalling 468,000 Pounds Of Meat
- Carter’s Recalls Infant Clothings With Zippers Due To Choking Hazard
- I work as a store manager and i work 60 to ninety hours a weeks please tell me s...
- I wondered why i couldn't find him on the DPS website.
Tell Marc to contact me...
- I want to be involved in this lawsuit. I was a 3rd key making $8.25 per hour wi...
- Great to find a site like this that informs us of what our tax dollars are payin...
- can you please emaik me a copy of your article on april 16th wells fargo suid f...
- ALL OF THESE STORIES ARE SIMILAR AND ALMOAT THE SAME IN TIME FRAMES. FOR TWO YEA...
- they tried forexloaing on my home with a fraudulent note. how do I know that? I ...
- Yes, Sharon, we were aware of the button... however, it didn't work. Took it to...
Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments
Settlement In BTSI Defect Case
More In Recent Settlements
- A Further Update On The AWP Litigation
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Fort McClellan Radio Tower Collapse Case
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Sikorsky Helicopter Crash
- The Philadelphia Story
- St. Croix, Virgin Islands Settlement
Liability, Personal Injury, Product Liability - May 2, 2013 8:56 - 0 Comments
Kentucky Jury Awards Significant Damages In Defective Cochlear Implant Case
More In Product Liability
- Colorado Jury Finds Helmet Maker Riddell At Fault
- Remington Model 700 Misfires
- Submersion Lawsuit Highlights Escape Design Gaps
- Ford Ordered To Pay Driver $3 Million For Injuries In 2009 Crash
- Court Upholds $33 Million Verdict In Fatal Van Rollover Against Cooper Tire
Recalls Update - May 3, 2013 9:23 - 0 Comments
Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods
More In Recalls Update
- Winn-Dixie Recalls Organic Apple Juice On Mold Fears
- Manda Packing Recalling 468,000 Pounds Of Meat
- Carter’s Recalls Infant Clothings With Zippers Due To Choking Hazard
- Small World Toys Recalls Spin-A-Mals Farm And Safari Puzzles
- Infant Froggy Socks Sold At Cracker Barrel Recalled
Leave a Reply