Mass Torts Update - Written by Beasley Allen on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 15:03 - 0 Comments

An Update On The Pradaxa Litigation

Approved by the in October 2010, Pradaxa (Dabigatran) is marketed by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., to reduce the risk of strokes and blood clots in people who have atrial fibrillation, a common heart rhythm abnormality. Pradaxa is in a class of anticoagulant medications known as “blood thinners.” Pradaxa is a direct thrombin inhibitor. It prevents the formation of blood clots by counteracting the effects of thrombin, which is responsible for clotting. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals markets Pradaxa as the preferred blood thinner. According to Boehringer, it is easier to dose, requires less monitoring, and is more effective at preventing clots compared to Warfarin (Coumadin). However, unlike Warfarin, Pradaxa’s anticoagulation effect cannot be reversed with vitamin K, significantly increasing the odds that a bleeding event will turn fatal.

As you may know, atrial fibrillation is the most common heart rhythm condition. Patients with this condition typically require blood-thinning medications. Warfarin is one such blood-thinner that is commonly used. Pradaxa is the first alternative to that drug. In November 2010 the drug manufacturer confirmed at least 260 fatal bleeding events in patients taking Pradaxa.

Pradaxa side effects have prompted safety advisories in Japan and Australia and have led to labeling updates in Europe and the United States. The recently required the German pharmaceutical manufacturer Boehringer Ingelheim to update its Pradaxa label after receiving a large number of adverse event reports from consumers. The January 2012 label change added minimal information regarding the dangers of bleeding events and the lack of a reversal agent for Pradaxa.

To date, there have been significant numbers of fatal bleeds reported to the . The lack of a reversal agent is believed to be the cause of the significant number of bleeding-related adverse events. While various reports have linked 260 bleeding deaths to Pradaxa, Boehringer, in an official statement on November 2, 2011, linked about 50 bleeding deaths to Pradaxa, which Boehringer asserted is consistent with expectations from the Pradaxa clinical trials. Earlier this year, the required Boehringer to modify the Pradaxa warning label to reflect the lack of a reversal agent, which, amazingly, had not been included in the original warnings. The is currently evaluating the reports of bleeding deaths and investigating whether the rate of severe bleeding reports is higher than what was seen in the Pradaxa clinical trials. At this point, there is no black box warning for Pradaxa.

If you or someone you care about took Pradaxa and suffered a personal injury or died, you may have a pharmaceutical defect claim against the manufacturer of Pradaxa. We are currently investigating of serious injuries and deaths involving Pradaxa. If you need additional information or would like for us to review your potential claim, please contact Roger Smith, a in our Mass Torts Section, by way of email at Roger.Smith@BeasleyAllen.com or call him at 800-898-2034.



Leave a Reply

Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

Powered by WP Hashcash

Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments

Settlement In BTSI Defect Case

More In Recent Settlements


Liability, Personal Injury, Product Liability - May 2, 2013 8:56 - 0 Comments

Kentucky Jury Awards Significant Damages In Defective Cochlear Implant Case

More In Product Liability


Recalls Update - May 3, 2013 9:23 - 0 Comments

Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods

More In Recalls Update