Transportation - Written by Beasley Allen on Thursday, March 15, 2012 14:57 - 0 Comments
Trucking companies are trying to block Obama Administration rules designed to assure that commercial truckers on the road get proper rest. The American Trucking Association (ATA) filed a petition last month with the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia asking the Court to review the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s recently published final rule changing the hours-of-service regulations for commercial truck drivers. The trucking industry group maintains that the new rules are based on faulty assumptions and research and that any benefits are outweighed by the extra costs they will incur.
ATA claims the new rules are not necessary because rules already in place are working to reduce crashes. FMCSA’s new hours-of-service (HOS) rule reduces by 12 hours the maximum number of hours a truck driver can work within a week. Under the old rule, truck drivers could work on average up to 82 hours within a seven-day period. The new HOS final rule limits a driver’s work week to 70 hours. It also mandates a 30 minute rest period within every eight hour period.
ATA says it will support FMCSA’s move toward mandated electronic on-board recorders to ensure greater compliance with the current HOS rules. ATA also said it also supports a new government requirement for large trucks to be electronically speed limited; a return to a national maximum speed limit of 65 mph for all vehicles; and greater deployment of automated speed and traffic enforcement technologies.
The Department of Transportation’s FMSCA announced the HOS changes last December in an attempt to help prevent fatigue-related truck crashes. FMCSA Administrator Anne S. Ferro at the time said:
This final rule is the culmination of the most extensive and transparent public outreach effort in our agency’s history. With robust input from all areas of the trucking community, coupled with the latest scientific research, we carefully crafted a rule acknowledging that when truckers are rested, alert and focused on safety, it makes our roadways safer.
Actually, the new rules, while criticized by the industry, fell short of what some safety advocates wanted. Advocates had opposed letting truckers stay on the road for 11 hours per day, but the FMSCA retained the 11-hour daily driving limit. FMCSA has said it will continue to examine any risks associated with the 11 hours of driving time. In addition to limiting number of hours truckers may work in a week to 70, the FMSCA’s revised rules say that truck drivers cannot drive after working eight hours without first taking a break of at least 30 minutes. Drivers can take the 30-minute break whenever they need rest during the eight-hour window.
The rules also require truck drivers who maximize their weekly work hours to take at least two nights’ rest when their 24-hour body clock demands sleep the most – from 1:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. This rest requirement is part of the rule’s “34-hour restart” provision that allows drivers to restart the clock on their work week by taking at least 34 consecutive hours off-duty. Drivers may use the restart provision only once during a seven-day period. Trucking companies that allow drivers to exceed the 11-hour driving limit by three or more hours could be fined $11,000 per offense, and the drivers themselves could face civil penalties of up to $2,750 for each offense. Commercial truck drivers and companies must comply with the new HOS requirements by July 1, 2013. Based on the experiences of lawyers in our firm who handle personal injury and death cases involving large trucks, I believe the new rules are needed and should be upheld. In fact, I agree with the safety advocates who say the government didn’t go far enough when the new rules were promulgated.
Source: Insurance Journal
Leave a Reply
- Favorite Bible Verses
- The Firm Settles Wal-Mart Case in Arizona Involving Rollover Crash Due to Tire Age
- 2013 Was a Banner Year for Whistleblower Cases
- Favorite Bible Verses
- Jere Beasley Report, February 2014
- Efforts Underway to Enact Uniform Data Security Law
- General Motors' Faulty Ignition Switch Defect Involves Seven Models
- Toyota Pleads Guilty to Criminal Charges
- PepsiCo Failed To Disclose Cancer-Causing Ingredient
- $100 Million Settlement In NECC Meningitis MDL
- Toyota Pleads Guilty to Criminal Charges
- Record-Breaking Recoveries in Health Care Fraud Cases for Whistleblowers
- Endo Faces Multistate Inquiry Over Pelvic Mesh Products
- FDA Shuts Down Cheese Factory In Delaware After Listeria Outbreak
- CPSC Warns Consumers Of The Dangers Of Storage And Toy Chests
- Target Missed Early Alert Or Credit Card Data Breach
- Online Fraud In 2012 Resulted In $525 Million In Losses
- CFPB Sues College Chain ITT Over Loans
- Baby Died From Swallowing Detergent In Laundry Packet
- Medical Device Recalls Doubled In Past Decade
- Toyota Acceleration Settlement In Canada Is Approved
- BECKY SLOAN
1349 WHITE MOUND CEMETERY RD
SHERMAN TX 75090
- When ir how do I get my money dur to all the overdrafts fees that have been char...
- I am sure my husband would want to be apart of this lawsuit to. i think they are...
- i am still in property after a stay in the vamc, may 8 - 22nd. for depression pe...
- Sounds good but not even close to what is needed !!! I spent 141 days in the hos...
- My HHR is a 2010, Ihad to replace my gear shifter because that is what they said...
We received a call from Beasley Allen after my March post saying that t...
- On my 2005 F150, driving home from work today, the regulator went out on the rig...
Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments
More In Recent Settlements
- A Further Update On The AWP Litigation
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Fort McClellan Radio Tower Collapse Case
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Sikorsky Helicopter Crash
- The Philadelphia Story
- St. Croix, Virgin Islands Settlement
Product Liability - Apr 1, 2014 13:26 - 1 Comment
More In Product Liability
- A Warning Relating To 15-Passenger Van Dangers
- Most States Consider Requiring Disclosure Of Tire’s Age To Consumers
- Beasley Allen Lawyers Are Already Handling GM Cases
- Congress And The Justice Department Weigh In On The Problem
- General Motors Will Have To Deal With Some Very Serious Safety Problems
Recalls Update - Apr 1, 2014 12:23 - 0 Comments
More In Recalls Update
- Listeria Death Prompts Cheese Recall
- Design Ideas Recalls Magnets Due To Risk Of Ingestion
- Cork Block Stacking Toys Recalled
- STX Recalls Shield Throat Protector Due To Laceration Hazard
- Air Movers Recalled By Packaging Tape Inc. Due To Fire Hazard