Workplace Hazards - Written by Beasley Allen on Wednesday, December 14, 2011 15:02 - 0 Comments
Each year, people are killed and maimed by explosions of finely powdered wood, metal or chemicals at factories around the country. Safety experts have been studying the threat posed by dust at industrial sites for nearly a decade. But so far tighter regulations haven’t been promulgated by federal agencies. Among the reasons for the delay are a cumbersome rulemaking process and disagreement among the agencies about how to best tackle the problem. Unfortunately, workers continue to die because of the delay.
Combustible dust has been linked to at least six deaths at factories this year. Five of the deaths occurred in separate accidents at a Tennessee plant that makes metal powders for automotive and industrial uses. Another worker was seriously injured by a fireball that investigators blame on an accumulation of iron dust at the same Hoeganaes Corp. plant in Gallatin, Tenn. Bill Kauffman, a retired University of Michigan Professor of Aeronautical Engineering, observed:
The science of explosion control is pretty simple. It’s not rocket science. If you can see your footprint or can write your name on the wall, it’s going to explode.
These industrial sites are regulated separately from grain handling facilities such as the one in Kansas that exploded in October, also killing six. While that tragedy served as a reminder of the dangers for grain industry workers, experts say there are even fewer protections for their 2.5 million counterparts around the country in other industries susceptible to dust explosions. In an inspection prior to the deadly explosions in Tennessee, dust hazards weren’t even checked. Hoeganaes was fined days before the second fatal blast, but not for breaking rules designed to prevent dust explosions — and that’s because there are none. The plant continues to operate and it doesn’t appear the owners have made any safety changes.
The seriousness of this problem is illustrated by figures compiled by the U.S. Chemical Safety Board. The scope of the problem is obviously very broad. A 2006 study reported there were at least 281 dust explosions in the U.S. between 1980 and 2005 that killed 119 workers and injured 718. In 2007, it was recommended that the Occupational Health and Safety Administration create workplace rules to control dust and cut down on explosions. The Chemical Safety Board is charged with investigating industrial accidents, but it must rely on regulatory agencies like OSHA to effect change from its findings. The Chemical Safety Board wrote in its 2007 report:
Despite the seriousness of the combustible dust problem in industry, OSHA lacks a comprehensive standard to require employers in general industry to implement the dust explosion prevention and mitigation measures.
OSHA decided instead to initiate a National Emphasis Program that stepped up education and inspections at plants in key industries. While the aim is to reduce dust explosions, inspectors have had to use regulations related to worker training and housekeeping because dust-specific rules are still being developed. According to the Chemical Safety Board, the rules currently being used are insufficient for preventing dust explosions. Numbers from the Chemical Safety Board, even though stricter dust rules were requested, indicate dust explosions have happened just as often. There have been at least 35 explosions with 26 dead and 128 hurt since the beginning of 2008.
Chemical Safety Board Chairman Rafael Moure-Eraso said in June that the plant shouldn’t reopen until it was completely redesigned. But the Board doesn’t have the power to close the plant. The Hoeganaes plant wasn’t redesigned, but it did reopen after what the company’s Vice President of Human Resources called “a comprehensive safety review.” The Hoeganaes plant’s last inspection before the explosions had been in 2008, and the inspector did not look for dust hazards or even enter production areas. That’s despite Tennessee’s participation in the National Emphasis Program. According to a Tennessee OSHA official, Hoeganaes wasn’t on an OSHA list of plants considered to be at high risk for dust explosions.
According to Assistant Labor Secretary Jordan Barab, it’s too early to assess the effectiveness of the program. A 2009 OSHA status report found that inspectors had issued more than 4,900 citations at targeted factories in a little under two years. On average, those factories received twice as many citations as facilities not targeted by the program.
Similar rules for different workplaces have paid off. OSHA has had regulations governing combustible dust in grain handling facilities since 1987. A 2003 review of those rules by OSHA found they had reduced deaths from grain dust explosions by 70%. Those rules are very specific. Grain dust is not allowed to accumulate on surfaces to a depth of more than 1/8 inch in defined “priority areas” of the facilities. In the aftermath of the Kansas explosion, experts said the facilities generally are safer than ever, but that only so much can be done to prevent deadly blasts.
The coal mining industry also has rules to prevent dust explosions that require noncombustible rock dust to be sprayed throughout a mine. Not everyone believes OSHA’s process for implementing rules for other industries needs to be so complicated. Professor Kauffman, who advised OSHA on its 1987 grain dust rules, acted as an expert witness on a panel this May that was convened to discuss new combustible dust regulations. He said the grain dust regulations were originally opposed by industry as too costly, but they were so effective that those same industries soon embraced them.
The Chemical Safety Board found that Hoeganaes submitted 23 dust samples from the Gallatin facility to an independent laboratory last year, and 14 were found to be combustible. It was reported that the problem at the plant was obvious to everyone there, even without a laboratory analysis. It’s high time that rules be put in place that will address an obvious safety problem that puts workers at risk for death or serious injury.
Source: Insurance Journal
Leave a Reply
- Testosterone Multidistrict Litigation Has Been Formed
- Favorite Bible Verses
- Exploding Airbags is the Next Hidden Danger Lurking on the Horizon
- An Update on the Firm's Mass Torts Litigation
- The Travis Grant Story Is A Good One
- The Civil Justice System Does Make a Difference
- BP's Stay Request Fails Before the Supreme Court
- Favorite Bible Verses
- Eight Car Makers Join in the Recall of Exploding Airbags
- The Deepwater Horizon Claims Program is Up and Running Again
- Favorite Bible Verses
- Pollution Plagues The Water In Alabama
- New York Appeals Court Decisions May Impact Fracking Nationwide
- The Prices Of Generic Drugs Are Going Up
- John Hopkins Settles Pelvic Exam Lawsuits For $190 Million
- An Update On Boating Accidents
- There Were 10 Deaths And 123 Injured During 4th Of July Travel Period In Alabama
- Tracy Morgan Files Suit Against Wal-Mart
- OSHA Issues Safety Violations To Bridge Company
- Investigators Say Overloaded Storage Bins Caused Building Collapse
- Jury Returns $15 Million Verdict Against The Los Angeles Dodgers
- Safeguards Needed To Protect The Public Against Predatory Lenders
- My 2007 F150 Triton 4x4 truck has had two regulators replaced on the driver door...
- Just in case Ford ever steps up, I'm chiming in. Original Owner 2004 F150 SCrew...
- August 26, 2014 - my wife has received an August GM recall notice on her 2002 mo...
- Thanks, Tiffany Lindsay keep me posted...
- To the lawyer of this firm, something similar happen to me today while traveling...
- Ford sucks! for not recalling this issue... I am on my second replacement.
- Both my front window regulators crapped out on my 2004 f150 back in 2007. Haven...
- I would like to join this lawsuit, I was a manager for 3+ years. I worked many ...
Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments
More In Recent Settlements
- A Further Update On The AWP Litigation
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Fort McClellan Radio Tower Collapse Case
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Sikorsky Helicopter Crash
- The Philadelphia Story
- St. Croix, Virgin Islands Settlement
Product Liability - Aug 1, 2014 14:22 - 0 Comments
More In Product Liability
- NHTSA Finally Issues A Rear Underride Standard
- Dangers Associated With Portable Bed Handles
- A Danger in Your Home Is Hiding In Plain Sight
- Joan Claybrook Recalls Important Product Safety Issues She Dealt With As Head Of NHTSA
- GM Stops Sales Of Some Cadillacs Over Ignition Issue
Recalls Update - Aug 1, 2014 12:23 - 0 Comments
More In Recalls Update
- Unique Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. Recalls All Sterile Compounded Preparations Within Their Expire Period
- Dream On Me Recalls High Chairs Due To Strangulation And Fall Hazards
- Oeuf Recalls To Repair Cribs Due To Entrapment Hazard
- Fiberglass Boom May Conduct Electricity
- Porter-Cable Fixed-Base Production Routers Recalled Due To Electrical Shock Hazard