Business Litigation - Written by Beasley Allen on Thursday, October 6, 2011 12:45 - 0 Comments
Our firm remains actively involved in antitrust cases around the country. With the economy as tough as it is, companies are finding their competition tougher as well. As a result, companies are doing whatever they can to remain or become competitive. Some of these actions cross a line and are targeted by national competition laws, such as the Sherman Antitrust Act, Clayton Antitrust Act, Robinson-Patman Act, and the Federal Trade Commission Act. Additionally, all states have their own antitrust laws, many of which are similar or identical to federal antitrust statutes and are interpreted by the state courts to be consistent with federal law.
Our firm has filed suit against Astellas US, LLC, alleging violation of Federal and Florida state antitrust laws by Astellas, a global top-twenty pharmaceutical company. We represent Lakeland Regional Medical Center, an outstanding non-profit hospital located in Lakeland, Fla. Our suit was filed as a class action and seeks to represent hospitals and clinics nationwide that have been damaged due to Astellas’ anticompetitive behavior. The case is pending in the middle district of Florida.
The suit relates to the use of adenosine, a naturally occurring substance, used in connection with cardiac stress tests. These relatively routine tests are conducted daily at Lakeland Regional and at hundreds of hospitals and clinics throughout the country. Astellas has violated antitrust law by illegally tying the purchase of Astellas’ unpatented adenosine drug, Adenoscan®, to the purchase of its patented method of administering adenosine to patients. In other words, Astellas will not let Lakeland Regional’s doctors use its method of adenosine administration unless Lakeland Regional also purchases Adenoscan® at an inflated price.
Identical generic adenosine is available at one-fourth the price of Adenoscan®, but Astellas will not allow Lakeland Regional and other hospitals and clinics to purchase the generic product. Astellas has gone so far as to threaten patent infringement litigation against Lakeland Regional and other hospitals and clinics that have sought to purchase identical, but less expensive, generic adenosine. This case is a good example of how pharmaceutical companies are driving up the cost of healthcare in this country, as this conduct by Astellas costs Lakeland Regional alone approximately $500,000 annually. The excess costs to hospitals and clinics nationwide run into the hundreds of millions of dollars!
In August, the District Court judge denied Astellas’ motion to dismiss the lawsuit, and all allegations against the company survive as we move towards class certification. Contact Archie Grubb, a lawyer in our Consumer Fraud Section, at 800-898-2034 or by email at Archie.Grubb@beasleyallen.com if you have any questions about this case, or about our firm’s antitrust litigation practice.
Leave a Reply
- Testosterone Multidistrict Litigation Has Been Formed
- Favorite Bible Verses
- Exploding Airbags is the Next Hidden Danger Lurking on the Horizon
- An Update on the Firm's Mass Torts Litigation
- The Travis Grant Story Is A Good One
- The Civil Justice System Does Make a Difference
- BP's Stay Request Fails Before the Supreme Court
- Favorite Bible Verses
- Eight Car Makers Join in the Recall of Exploding Airbags
- The Deepwater Horizon Claims Program is Up and Running Again
- Favorite Bible Verses
- Pollution Plagues The Water In Alabama
- New York Appeals Court Decisions May Impact Fracking Nationwide
- The Prices Of Generic Drugs Are Going Up
- John Hopkins Settles Pelvic Exam Lawsuits For $190 Million
- An Update On Boating Accidents
- There Were 10 Deaths And 123 Injured During 4th Of July Travel Period In Alabama
- Tracy Morgan Files Suit Against Wal-Mart
- OSHA Issues Safety Violations To Bridge Company
- Investigators Say Overloaded Storage Bins Caused Building Collapse
- Jury Returns $15 Million Verdict Against The Los Angeles Dodgers
- Safeguards Needed To Protect The Public Against Predatory Lenders
- It would of been nice to got a letter!!!! For my 2012 tri-glide, mine just start...
- My 2007 F150 Triton 4x4 truck has had two regulators replaced on the driver door...
- Just in case Ford ever steps up, I'm chiming in. Original Owner 2004 F150 SCrew...
- August 26, 2014 - my wife has received an August GM recall notice on her 2002 mo...
- Thanks, Tiffany Lindsay keep me posted...
- To the lawyer of this firm, something similar happen to me today while traveling...
- Ford sucks! for not recalling this issue... I am on my second replacement.
- Both my front window regulators crapped out on my 2004 f150 back in 2007. Haven...
Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments
More In Recent Settlements
- A Further Update On The AWP Litigation
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Fort McClellan Radio Tower Collapse Case
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Sikorsky Helicopter Crash
- The Philadelphia Story
- St. Croix, Virgin Islands Settlement
Product Liability - Aug 1, 2014 14:22 - 0 Comments
More In Product Liability
- NHTSA Finally Issues A Rear Underride Standard
- Dangers Associated With Portable Bed Handles
- A Danger in Your Home Is Hiding In Plain Sight
- Joan Claybrook Recalls Important Product Safety Issues She Dealt With As Head Of NHTSA
- GM Stops Sales Of Some Cadillacs Over Ignition Issue
Recalls Update - Aug 1, 2014 12:23 - 0 Comments
More In Recalls Update
- Unique Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. Recalls All Sterile Compounded Preparations Within Their Expire Period
- Dream On Me Recalls High Chairs Due To Strangulation And Fall Hazards
- Oeuf Recalls To Repair Cribs Due To Entrapment Hazard
- Fiberglass Boom May Conduct Electricity
- Porter-Cable Fixed-Base Production Routers Recalled Due To Electrical Shock Hazard