Lawmakers are mixing charitable and political agendas which create yet another loophole that ultimately allows more corporate influence in Congress. The New York Times found that “at least two dozen charities that lawmakers or their families helped create or run routinely accept donations from businesses seeking to influence them.” Among these corporations making donations are AT&T, Chevron, General Dynamics, Morgan Stanley and Eli Lilly.
A provision to rules imposed in 2007 allows these businesses to make unlimited gifts to the lawmaker’s charities. It’s a win-win for business executives who claim they want to give to a “good cause,” when they actually are seeking to influence politicians’ positions on legislation or policy. For example, the cigarette maker, Altria, quickly donated at least $45,000 over a six-week period to four House members’ charitable programs. This so-called good deed conveniently coincided with the company’s attempts to seek “approval of legislation intended to curb illegal Internet sales of its cigarettes.” Surely the bosses at these companies knew what the indirect effect of their gifts would be. Craig Holman, who is Public Citizen government affairs lobbyist, said:
It’s plain and simple influence peddling. These are the same businesses that have maxed out in giving campaign contributions. They find other ways to keep throwing money at these members of Congress.
These charities may be helping those in need, but not without members of Congress getting the benefits of corporate giving that isn’t regulated by campaign finance laws. While some good results, it’s wrong for both the corporations and lawmakers to operate in this manner.
Contact us today for a free legal consultation with an experienced attorney.
Fields marked *may be required for submission.
If you would like to subscribe to the Jere Beasley Report digital edition, simply visit our Subscriptions page and provide the necessary information or call us at 800-898-2034.
Attorney Advertising - Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.