Gulf Coast Disaster - Written by Beasley Allen on Friday, June 25, 2010 12:13 - 0 Comments

Transocean Wants Maritime Law To Limit Its Massive Liability

On May 13th filed for protection from lawsuits by claiming Limitation of Liability under a 150-year-old maritime law. As previously stated, owns the oil drilling platform , which was being leased by BP when it exploded and sank into the Gulf of Mexico. A “limitations ” was filed in the Houston Federal Court. The suit was brought under a maritime law that was sponsored by Congress in 1851 to protect ship owners.

Limitation of Liability under the 1851 Act allows U.S. ship owners to limit their financial liability to the post-accident value of its vessel and cargo. Under this antiquated law, the ship owner would have to show it had no knowledge of negligence resulting in the ship’s destruction and subsequent consequences. The oil drilling rig was considered a vessel under U.S. maritime law because it is capable of being navigated. According to this law, claims the value of the wreck at just under $27 million.

It’s clear is attempting to limit its massive legal liability by filing this . The company and others will owe tens of billions of dollars to the thousands of folks who will be badly hurt and damaged by the massive oil spill. This is a blatant attempt to limit that exposure to only $27 million. Trying to take advantage of an antiquated statute which was never intended to apply to a massive disaster of this magnitude shows how little regard the bosses at really have for the folks who have been badly hurt and damaged by their actions. In fact, what did is about as bad as anything a corporate entity with terrific legal exposure could have done in an attempt to further hurt the folks they have already badly hurt. I don’t believe any court will allow billions of dollars in damages to be limited by filing a limitations from the 1800s such as this one. What did was shameful. Our firm will take all appropriate action on behalf of our clients and others to protect their interests and to make sure no wrongdoer gets off the hook.



Leave a Reply

Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

Powered by WP Hashcash

Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments

Settlement In BTSI Defect Case

More In Recent Settlements


Liability, Personal Injury, Product Liability - May 2, 2013 8:56 - 0 Comments

Kentucky Jury Awards Significant Damages In Defective Cochlear Implant Case

More In Product Liability


Recalls Update - May 3, 2013 9:23 - 0 Comments

Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods

More In Recalls Update