Toyota Litigation Update - Written by Beasley Allen on Friday, June 25, 2010 12:26 - 0 Comments
Toyota Plays Hard Ball And Is Deceitful
NHTSA released some documents last month that are extremely damaging to Toyota’s claims that it has never hidden anything from the federal government concerning its safety issues. Letters sent by Toyota to NHTSA in 2004 and 2005 were made public. These letters raised questions from both federal investigators and victims’ lawyers about whether the company was hiding safety defects and misleading regulators.
NHTSA opened an investigation into whether Toyota gave the agency timely notification of steering problems with nearly 1 million 4Runner SUVs, T100 pickups and Toyota trucks before starting a September 2005 recall in the U.S. Toyota had received 41 complaints from U.S. customers about fatigue cracks in the steering relay rods before October 2004. That’s the month the company began its Japan recall of comparable Hilux and Hilux Surf vehicles for similar reasons. It’s evident that Toyota knew of several dozen U.S. complaints at least 10½ months before beginning a U.S. recall. Automakers are required by law to notify NHTSA within five business days of safety defects. Here is what Toyota (TMC) told NHTSA in its 2004-05 letters:
- Oct. 26, 2004: “Reason the affected vehicles sold in the U.S. are not involved in this recall: TMC has received field information from the Japanese market, but no similar information from the U.S. market has been received.”
- Sept. 6, 2005: “End of October 2004: TMC conducted a safety campaign for the steering relay rod on certain Toyota Hilux and Hilux Surf vehicles in Japan. TMC considered that problem was the result of the unique operating condition in Japan, i.e. frequent standing full lock turns, such as for narrow parking spaces and close-quarter maneuvering. Although TMC did not receive similar information from the U.S., TMC continued monitoring field information and started to recover subject parts from markets other than Japan.”
Both letters were signed by Toyota Motor North America Vice President Chris Tinto, who previously had worked for NHTSA. The Toyota letters were obtained in litigation against the automobile maker and turned over to NHTSA. A lawyer involved in a lawsuit against Toyota made a request to NHTSA, calling for an investigation into “the wide chronological gaps and apparent falsehoods Toyota has provided.” Now NHTSA’s document request to Toyota includes all consumer complaints, field reports, and crash reports before both recalls. No one should be surprised if Mr. Tinto and a number of his subordinates find themselves in front of a Congressional panel again before long. This company has a history of safety issues, and also it now appears to have a history of hiding what it had to know from NHTSA as well as from the public.
Source: Automotive News
- Jere Beasley Report, April 2013
- Alabama to Receive $1,039,078 in Multi-State Settlement
- COSTCO Recalls Gold Coast Crab Dip
- Major Banks Assist In Payday Loans Banned By States
- Marc McHenry Hired As Investigator
- We Have Allowed A Culture Of Violence To Be Created In The U.S.
- Parting Words
- Closing Observations
- Favorite Bible Verses
- WSFA News Defenders Interviews
- Beasley Allen Hosts The Child Safety Helmet Giveaway
- SPLC Looks At How Payday And Title Loans Prey On Alabama’s Poorest
- Employee Spotlights
- Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods
- Winn-Dixie Recalls Organic Apple Juice On Mold Fears
- Manda Packing Recalling 468,000 Pounds Of Meat
- Carter’s Recalls Infant Clothings With Zippers Due To Choking Hazard
- I want to be involved in this lawsuit. I was a 3rd key making $8.25 per hour wi...
- Great to find a site like this that informs us of what our tax dollars are payin...
- can you please emaik me a copy of your article on april 16th wells fargo suid f...
- ALL OF THESE STORIES ARE SIMILAR AND ALMOAT THE SAME IN TIME FRAMES. FOR TWO YEA...
- they tried forexloaing on my home with a fraudulent note. how do I know that? I ...
- Yes, Sharon, we were aware of the button... however, it didn't work. Took it to...
- When would we get paid?...
- Would like to know how much longer will it be before we get paid....
Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments
Settlement In BTSI Defect Case
More In Recent Settlements
- A Further Update On The AWP Litigation
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Fort McClellan Radio Tower Collapse Case
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Sikorsky Helicopter Crash
- The Philadelphia Story
- St. Croix, Virgin Islands Settlement
Liability, Personal Injury, Product Liability - May 2, 2013 8:56 - 0 Comments
Kentucky Jury Awards Significant Damages In Defective Cochlear Implant Case
More In Product Liability
- Colorado Jury Finds Helmet Maker Riddell At Fault
- Remington Model 700 Misfires
- Submersion Lawsuit Highlights Escape Design Gaps
- Ford Ordered To Pay Driver $3 Million For Injuries In 2009 Crash
- Court Upholds $33 Million Verdict In Fatal Van Rollover Against Cooper Tire
Recalls Update - May 3, 2013 9:23 - 0 Comments
Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods
More In Recalls Update
- Winn-Dixie Recalls Organic Apple Juice On Mold Fears
- Manda Packing Recalling 468,000 Pounds Of Meat
- Carter’s Recalls Infant Clothings With Zippers Due To Choking Hazard
- Small World Toys Recalls Spin-A-Mals Farm And Safari Puzzles
- Infant Froggy Socks Sold At Cracker Barrel Recalled

Leave a Reply