Product Liability - Written by Beasley Allen on Monday, April 26, 2010 12:47 - 0 Comments
Weak Roof Increases Severe Injury and Death In Rollover Crashes
Because of its extreme significance from a safety perspective, I asked Greg Allen, the Senior Lawyer in our Product Liability Section, to write a piece on roof crush litigation. Greg has handled a number of these cases and has several pending. He is extremely knowledgeable about roof crush issues. He is recognized as an expert on the subject.
Our firm has recently handled a number of rollover cases where the roof in the car or truck failed to protect the occupants. Consumers have no way of knowing when they buy a car or truck whether the roof will protect them in a rollover crash. The strength of a vehicle’s roof is measured by what manufacturers call the “strength to weight ratio.” The federal standard governing minimum roof strength was passed in 1971. That standard only requires that the manufacturer meet a strength to weight ratio of 1.5 times the weight of the vehicle.
Some manufacturers design their roofs to have exceptionally good strength while others do not. Some manufacturers design down to the minimum standard of 1.5 times the vehicle weight. It is obvious that in a rollover the strength of the roof must significantly exceed one and a half times the weight of the vehicle. Rollover forces are much higher than that.
To pass the current federal standard, a car must withstand basically being placed on its roof and one half of its weight being gently put on the bottom of it. If the vehicle can support the weight plus one half with less than five inches of roof crush, it will pass the standard. Obviously, that is inadequate roof support.
Fortunately, NHTSA recently saw the error of its ways and in December of 2009 passed a rule that will double the strength of vehicle roofs of passenger cars and light trucks starting in 2012. In the meantime, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety will be adding a new roof rating system. It is important that the public understand what they’re buying. In order to receive a marginal rating from the Insurance Institute, minimum strength to weight ratio of 2.5 will be required. An acceptable rating will be 3.25.
To receive a good rating the vehicle roof must withstand a force of four times the vehicles weight before reaching five inches of crush. Anything lower than a 2.5 will be considered a poor vehicle. There are many vehicles on the road that have less than 2.5 strength to weight ratio. There are serious injuries, including quadriplegia and deaths resulting from these extremely poor roofs. The cost of the vehicle is not related to roof strength. There are some very inexpensive vehicles that have very strong roofs. NASCAR drivers and their car builders have known for years of the need to have a strong roof. These cars can roll over many times and the occupant usually escapes injury.
Hopefully manufacturers will someday design the roofs to protect the occupants. It’s too bad we have to wait for the federal government to mandate stronger roofs.
Greg Allen
Beasley Allen
March 30, 2010
If you want more information on this subject, you can contact Greg at 800-898-2034 or by email at Greg.Allen@beasleyallen.com. He will be glad to answer any questions you might have.
- SuperPAC's Are Running Wild In The GOP Presidential Primaries
- Bank Of America Owes Former Financial Advisors Millions
- Another Nissan Recall
- Dorel Recalling Nearly 800,000 Child Safety Seats
- Government Seeks Approval Of $25 Billion Settlement With Banks On Mortgage Abuses
- JPMorgan Chase Investigated Over Credit-Card Collections
- Debt Collector Settles With The Governor's Office Of Consumer Protection
- Actos Bladder Cancer Whistleblower Lawsuit Unsealed
- Jere Beasley Report, May 2012
- A Public Library For A Small Alabama Town
- A Monthly Reminder
- The FCA Is One Of My Favorite Organizations
- Democracy Is For People And Not For Corporations
- Favorite Bible Verses
- Coach Pat Dye Has Taken On A New Challenge
- Dee Miles To Chair Cumberland Advisory Board
- Alabama State Troopers Get The Job Done And They Need Help
- Holly Busler
- Shanna Malone
- I would like you to send me a application for lawsuit involving my 2006 Ford Die...
- My name is Hazel Richardson and I am one of the former employee's of the Tyson C...
- i got a 1700 dollar check from them it was awesome...
- There was lot of changes in my life after hiring attorney for actos lawsuit from...
- ML BofA has reneged on their obligations to me in regards to several such plans....
- I would like to join,i am currently a Manager for Dollar General,I have been wit...
- Just replaced drivers window regulator with a price tag of $256.00. I have a 200...
- Isn’t it about time to sue these people, make them pay you to go away, until the...
Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments
Settlement In BTSI Defect Case
More In Recent Settlements
- A Further Update On The AWP Litigation
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Fort McClellan Radio Tower Collapse Case
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Sikorsky Helicopter Crash
- The Philadelphia Story
- St. Croix, Virgin Islands Settlement
Product Liability - May 11, 2012 10:11 - 0 Comments
Another Riding Lawnmower Tragedy
More In Product Liability
- Companies To Pay $14.8 Million In FEMA Trailer Settlement
- An Invisible Danger Exists With Aging Tires
- Heavy Truck Cab Guards Save Lives
- Stopping Occupant Ejection In Motor Vehicles Saves Lives
- Toyota Lawsuits Headed For Trial
Recalls Update - May 14, 2012 9:20 - 0 Comments
Taco Dinner Kits From Kroger, Winn-Dixie And Food Lion Recalled Due To Undeclared Milk
More In Recalls Update
- Dole Recalls Bagged Salad For Salmonella Risk
- Tuna Linked To Salmonella Outbreak Recalled
- Odwalla Chocolate Protein Drink Recalled
- Main Company Recalls A Ton Of Beef
- Recall Follows Tylenol Lawsuit
Leave a Reply