Environmental Concerns - Written by Beasley Allen on Friday, April 30, 2010 16:28 - 3 Comments

Update On Hot Fuel Litigation

As we have reported in past editions, our firm continues to play an important role in the Hot Fuel which is consolidated in Kansas City, Kansas.  At the center of the is a simple concept and that’s fairness for the consumer.  When customers purchase motor fuel by the gallon, they expect to receive a gallon’s worth of energy due.  However, due to a phenomenon known as thermal expansion, consumers are not receiving the fuel they pay for. Specifically, thermal expansion causes gasoline to expand as temperatures increase and creates “expanded gallons” of fuel that harbor less energy than before expansion. Ultimately, consumers in hot states, such as Alabama, Georgia or Florida, are receiving less per-gallon energy to power their cars than they are actually paying for while are able to generate massive profits from additional “expanded gallons” the high temperatures create.

The has known about the effects of thermal expansion on motor fuel liquids for decades. As such, the helped establish the U.S. Petroleum Gallon, where a gallon is equal to 231 cubic inches measured at 60 degrees.  To ensure that received consistent and fair gallons for each intra-industry transfer, they implement a temperature compensation device that would automatically compensate for temperature based on the U.S. Petroleum Gallon. This technology, known as automatic temperature compensation (ATC), is actually utilized at every level of the oil distribution process – except at the consumer level.  In fact, the refuses to implement the same technology to ensure that consumers receive a consistent gallon of motor fuel measured to temperature.  Our seeks to remedy this problem and ensure that customers get the same technology and equal treatment as powerful .

During the past couple of months, our firm, working with some of the most successful plaintiffs’ firms in the nation, have scored substantial victories in the Hot Fuel case. After defeating the Defendants’ initial motions to dismiss on behalf of the plaintiffs, we were able to achieve a preliminary with Costco Wholesale. Costco agreed to retrofit its gasoline dispensers in the states they temperature adjust on an intra-company basis.   Final arguments for approval of the Costco were to be heard on April 1st.  Approval of the would be a huge step towards resolution of the cases.

Additionally, the Plaintiffs were able to defeat the Defendants’ “political question” dispositive motion that would have dismissed the entire . Specifically, the Defendants argued that the Court could not determine whether ATC should be implemented – they argued such a question was best left for the regulators to decide.  But, the Court sided with the Plaintiffs and denied the Defendants’ motion.

On March 4th, the Plaintiffs won another substantial victory for consumers when Judge Kathryn Vratil of the District of Kansas agreed with the Plaintiffs’ arguments and overturned a previous discovery ruling that favored the . From the inception of this case, the Plaintiffs have claimed that the conspired and used their political clout to keep ATC out of the consumer marketplace. The , clutching to a confusing and archaic First Amendment argument, have strongly opposed production of internal lobbying documentation with oil trade groups that would directly support the Plaintiffs’ conspiracy arguments.  With the release of these very important documents, we expect the truth to finally come out about how the have “strong-armed” an industry for decades at the expense of consumers.

Currently, the Plaintiffs’ motions for certification are pending in the District of Kansas and should be ruled on in the next couple of months.  While the have fought hard in this case, we remain fully confident that right will win out and our side will prevail.  If you have any questions about this , please contact Beasley Allen Hot Fuel lawyers Rhon Jones and Parker Miller at Rhon.Jones@beasleyallen.com and Parker.Miller@beasleyallen.com, respectively.  Alternatively, you can contact our firm at 800-898-2034.



3 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

jerry lewis
Mar 6, 2012 11:08

how to get on the class action suit?

MARK
Mar 13, 2012 10:58

this class action represents legal extorsion, vampire behavoir and general sleazy behavoir. Eeeeevil oil companies ! Beam me up Scottie !

Della Soellner
Mar 13, 2012 15:41

Is Kansas considered a hot state for purposes of this class action?

Leave a Reply

Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

Powered by WP Hashcash

Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments

Settlement In BTSI Defect Case

More In Recent Settlements


Product Liability - Jul 7, 2014 13:19 - 0 Comments

Petition Seeks To Block CarMax Sales Of Unrepaired Recalled Cars

More In Product Liability


Recalls Update - Jul 7, 2014 9:13 - 0 Comments

250,000 Glass Knobs Sold By World Market Recalled Due To Cutting Risk

More In Recalls Update