Environmental Concerns - Written by Beasley Allen on Friday, April 30, 2010 16:28 - 3 Comments
As we have reported in past editions, our firm continues to play an important role in the Hot Fuel Litigation which is consolidated in Kansas City, Kansas. At the center of the litigation is a simple concept and that’s fairness for the consumer. When customers purchase motor fuel by the gallon, they expect to receive a gallon’s worth of energy due. However, due to a phenomenon known as thermal expansion, consumers are not receiving the fuel they pay for. Specifically, thermal expansion causes gasoline to expand as temperatures increase and creates “expanded gallons” of fuel that harbor less energy than before expansion. Ultimately, consumers in hot states, such as Alabama, Georgia or Florida, are receiving less per-gallon energy to power their cars than they are actually paying for while oil companies are able to generate massive profits from additional “expanded gallons” the high temperatures create.
The oil industry has known about the effects of thermal expansion on motor fuel liquids for decades. As such, the oil industry helped establish the U.S. Petroleum Gallon, where a gallon is equal to 231 cubic inches measured at 60 degrees. To ensure that oil companies received consistent and fair gallons for each intra-industry transfer, they implement a temperature compensation device that would automatically compensate for temperature based on the U.S. Petroleum Gallon. This technology, known as automatic temperature compensation (ATC), is actually utilized at every level of the oil distribution process – except at the consumer level. In fact, the oil industry refuses to implement the same technology to ensure that consumers receive a consistent gallon of motor fuel measured to temperature. Our lawsuit seeks to remedy this problem and ensure that customers get the same technology and equal treatment as powerful oil companies.
During the past couple of months, our firm, working with some of the most successful plaintiffs’ firms in the nation, have scored substantial victories in the Hot Fuel case. After defeating the Defendants’ initial motions to dismiss on behalf of the plaintiffs, we were able to achieve a preliminary settlement with Costco Wholesale. Costco agreed to retrofit its gasoline dispensers in the states they temperature adjust on an intra-company basis. Final arguments for approval of the Costco settlement were to be heard on April 1st. Approval of the settlement would be a huge step towards resolution of the cases.
Additionally, the Plaintiffs were able to defeat the Defendants’ “political question” dispositive motion that would have dismissed the entire litigation. Specifically, the Defendants argued that the Court could not determine whether ATC should be implemented – they argued such a question was best left for the regulators to decide. But, the Court sided with the Plaintiffs and denied the Defendants’ motion.
On March 4th, the Plaintiffs won another substantial victory for consumers when Judge Kathryn Vratil of the District of Kansas agreed with the Plaintiffs’ arguments and overturned a previous discovery ruling that favored the oil companies. From the inception of this case, the Plaintiffs have claimed that the oil companies conspired and used their political clout to keep ATC out of the consumer marketplace. The oil companies, clutching to a confusing and archaic First Amendment argument, have strongly opposed production of internal lobbying documentation with oil trade groups that would directly support the Plaintiffs’ conspiracy arguments. With the release of these very important documents, we expect the truth to finally come out about how the oil companies have “strong-armed” an industry for decades at the expense of consumers.
Currently, the Plaintiffs’ motions for certification are pending in the District of Kansas and should be ruled on in the next couple of months. While the oil companies have fought hard in this case, we remain fully confident that right will win out and our side will prevail. If you have any questions about this litigation, please contact Beasley Allen Hot Fuel lawyers Rhon Jones and Parker Miller at Rhon.Jones@beasleyallen.com and Parker.Miller@beasleyallen.com, respectively. Alternatively, you can contact our firm at 800-898-2034.
Leave a Reply
- Testosterone Multidistrict Litigation Has Been Formed
- Exploding Airbags is the Next Hidden Danger Lurking on the Horizon
- Favorite Bible Verses
- An Update on the Firm's Mass Torts Litigation
- The Civil Justice System Does Make a Difference
- BP's Stay Request Fails Before the Supreme Court
- Eight Car Makers Join in the Recall of Exploding Airbags
- The Deepwater Horizon Claims Program is Up and Running Again
- Favorite Bible Verses
- J&J Pays Oregon $4 Million To Settle Hip Implant Marketing Claims
- EPA Should Update Fracking Pollution Regulations
- Deepwater Fracking Raises Environmental Concerns
- $27.8 Million Settlement Finalized In TVA Coal Ash Spill
- Illinois Transport Company Settles Fatal Crash Suit For $2.7 Million
- Settlement For Family Of College Student Killed In Crash After Alabama National Championship Game
- Macy’s Fined $1 Million For Decapitation Of Warehouse Employee
- Texas Plastics Plant Fined $174,000 For Safety And Health Violations
- OSHA Says Safety Violation Continue At Oklahoma Oil Refinery
- Company Cited In Fatal West Virginia Cell Tower Collapse
- New Safety Directive Issued By OSHA On Communication Tower Work
- $27 Million Verdict Returned In Texas Against McDonald’s
- hello just want you a up date mt email change to
firstname.lastname@example.org can you...
- Was just wondering if you can still be in this lawsuit. I was a manager for 8 yr...
- I keep reading that the pratice of steering is illegal and whole-heartidly suppo...
- Hello William, thank you for your question. We are not aware of any pending liti...
- Has litigation commenced as a result of this recall?...
- Sorry I meant to say settlement papers, but I did speak to someone in the Lawyer...
- I just spoke to someone and was told it will be another month or two before I wi...
- 2005 F150 super cab. Driver side regulator just broke. Dealer wants $200 just fo...
Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments
More In Recent Settlements
- A Further Update On The AWP Litigation
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Fort McClellan Radio Tower Collapse Case
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Sikorsky Helicopter Crash
- The Philadelphia Story
- St. Croix, Virgin Islands Settlement
Product Liability - Sep 4, 2014 13:13 - 0 Comments
More In Product Liability
- More Problems With Goodyear RV Tires
- NHTSA Offers Online Vehicle Recall Check
- Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Mazda For Engine Valve Defect
- GM Sued For Alleged Antifreeze Defect In Chevy Cruze Models
- Settlement By Kia And Hyundai In Fuel Efficiency MDL Is Approved
Recalls Update - Sep 4, 2014 11:03 - 0 Comments
More In Recalls Update
- USDA Recalls 7.5 Tons Of Applegate Frozen Chicken Nuggets
- J&J Unit Recalls Hysterectomy Device Over Cancer Fears
- Samson International Recalls Bar Stool Due To Fall Hazard
- Bexco Recalls Franklin & Ben Mason 4-in-1 Convertible Cribs Due To Fall And Entrapment Hazards
- Ace Bayou Bean Bag Chairs Recalled Because Of Suffocation And Choking Hazards