MetLife has agreed to pay $50 million to settle a class action claim that it defrauded 8.6 million policy holders when it converted from a mutual company in 2000 to one that is publicly traded. The settlement was reached after a jury had been selected in a case, and after Judge Jack B. Weinstein, the trial judge, ruled that MetLife could introduce a 103-page decision of the New York State Superintendent of Insurance approving both the conversion itself and the disclosure documents that MetLife had mailed to its policyholders. Judge Weinstein expressed skepticism about the strength of the Plaintiffs’ case and that led to the settlement.
The settlement also resolves a state-court class action pending in Manhattan. The two class actions in New York are the last of nine lawsuits filed against MetLife charging that the conversion was tainted with fraud. The other seven lawsuits were dismissed. Judge Weinstein set a hearing on the fairness of the settlement for the 30th of this month.
If approved, class members will not receive direct payments as a result of the settlement. Instead, the amount set aside at the time of the conversion to continue generating dividends for policyholders whose policies entitled them to receive dividends will be augmented by what remains of the $50 million after payment of expenses and attorney’s fees. The settlement also invokes the cy pres doctrine to provide for a $2.5 million payment to a nonprofit health research organization in lieu of compensation to those policyholders who did not have a right to receive dividends.
The class in the federal lawsuit claimed that MetLife violated federal securities laws by making significant omissions and misleading statements in materials sent to policyholders to win their support for the conversion. A majority of 93% approved the conversion in April 2000. Before ordering a fairness hearing, Judge Weinstein issued an opinion on the proposed settlement, finding it “probable” that the settlement will be found “fair, reasonable and adequate.”
According to the formula used in the notice to the class, the lawyers for federal Plaintiffs estimated the class would recover $8 billion if it prevailed on all claims. MetLife’s lawyers reported that the federal class would receive nothing even if it prevailed on all its claims. So there was a large range both between the two estimates and also between the amount claimed by the Plaintiffs and the settlement amount.
The lawyers for the state class estimated that its claims were worth between $400 million and $1.6 billion. Judge Weinstein wrote in his opinion that the settlement appears to have reached “an appropriate balance of the risks and benefits for all of those involved in this complex litigation.” A special master was appointed by the court to explore settlement possibilities with the parties.
Contact us today for a free legal consultation with an experienced attorney.
Fields marked *may be required for submission.
If you would like to subscribe to the Jere Beasley Report digital edition, simply visit our Subscriptions page and provide the necessary information or call us at 800-898-2034.
Attorney Advertising - Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.