Insurance and Finance Update - Written by Beasley Allen on Thursday, December 17, 2009 11:56 - 13 Comments
MetLife has agreed to pay $50 million to settle a class action claim that it defrauded 8.6 million policy holders when it converted from a mutual company in 2000 to one that is publicly traded. The settlement was reached after a jury had been selected in a case, and after Judge Jack B. Weinstein, the trial judge, ruled that MetLife could introduce a 103-page decision of the New York State Superintendent of Insurance approving both the conversion itself and the disclosure documents that MetLife had mailed to its policyholders. Judge Weinstein expressed skepticism about the strength of the Plaintiffs’ case and that led to the settlement.
The settlement also resolves a state-court class action pending in Manhattan. The two class actions in New York are the last of nine lawsuits filed against MetLife charging that the conversion was tainted with fraud. The other seven lawsuits were dismissed. Judge Weinstein set a hearing on the fairness of the settlement for the 30th of this month.
If approved, class members will not receive direct payments as a result of the settlement. Instead, the amount set aside at the time of the conversion to continue generating dividends for policyholders whose policies entitled them to receive dividends will be augmented by what remains of the $50 million after payment of expenses and attorney’s fees. The settlement also invokes the cy pres doctrine to provide for a $2.5 million payment to a nonprofit health research organization in lieu of compensation to those policyholders who did not have a right to receive dividends.
The class in the federal lawsuit claimed that MetLife violated federal securities laws by making significant omissions and misleading statements in materials sent to policyholders to win their support for the conversion. A majority of 93% approved the conversion in April 2000. Before ordering a fairness hearing, Judge Weinstein issued an opinion on the proposed settlement, finding it “probable” that the settlement will be found “fair, reasonable and adequate.”
According to the formula used in the notice to the class, the lawyers for federal Plaintiffs estimated the class would recover $8 billion if it prevailed on all claims. MetLife’s lawyers reported that the federal class would receive nothing even if it prevailed on all its claims. So there was a large range both between the two estimates and also between the amount claimed by the Plaintiffs and the settlement amount.
The lawyers for the state class estimated that its claims were worth between $400 million and $1.6 billion. Judge Weinstein wrote in his opinion that the settlement appears to have reached “an appropriate balance of the risks and benefits for all of those involved in this complex litigation.” A special master was appointed by the court to explore settlement possibilities with the parties.
Leave a Reply
- The Selma March
- Favorite Bible Verses
- Daiichi Sankyo Agrees to Pay $39 Million to Settle Whistleblower Lawsuit
- Aging and Dangerous Tires On Our School Buses
- District Court Sanctions Ghostwriting Of Expert Reports
- Cosco Recalls Convertible Hand Trucks Due To Injury Hazard
- Publix Reaches $30 Million Settlement With Employees In Overtime Location
- Class Action Sought For Toyota's Electric Power Steering Defect
- The Melton Case Settles
- Is Jeep's Fire Hazard Equivalent to GM's Ignition Switch Defect?
- A $24 Million Verdict in an Alabama Balcony Collapse Case
- Appeals Court Affirms Most Of $76 Million AstraZeneca Prilosec IP Win
- Panasonic To Pay $5.4 Million To Settle Auto Parts Price-Fixing Suit
- An Update On The Philadelphia Pelvic Mesh Litigation
- An Update On The Firm’s Mass Torts Section
- NHTSA Opens Investigation Into Hercules Tires
- $150 Million Verdict Returned Against Chrysler In Jeep Fire
- Activity In The Personal Injury And Product Liability Section
- Two Companies Settle Whistleblower Lawsuits For Nearly $50 Million
- High-Intensity Sonar Endangering Whale Population
- Save The Bees!
- Oil And Gas Driller Settles For $73 Million In Colorado Pollution Case
- Hello I recently received my claim form and the website was not related to claim...
- I just received my Publix check in the mail. Should I cash it or pursue for more...
- Just before you go seeking antiques for you older motor vehicle you should do yo...
- Automobile Parts: Exactly how Do I Locate The Unusual Ones?...
- I received notes in the mail on GAF timberline shingles being defective so wi...
- I have a 2005 F-150 which I purchased new in 2005. In 2012 the drivers side wind...
- I bought a 2003 Ford F-350 6.0 diesel in 2013 from a diesel mechanic that used t...
- The Amarillo Texas Smelter which operated from 1899 to current as a refinery has...
Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments
More In Recent Settlements
- A Further Update On The AWP Litigation
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Fort McClellan Radio Tower Collapse Case
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Sikorsky Helicopter Crash
- The Philadelphia Story
- St. Croix, Virgin Islands Settlement
Personal Injury, Product Liability - May 4, 2015 8:35 - 0 Comments
Wrongful Death Case Involving a Defective Ford Explorer, Firestone Tire Settled by Beasley Allen Lawyers
More In Product Liability
- Honda Adds 105,000 Vehicles To Its U.S. Recall
- The Takata Airbag Saga Continues To Expand
- Ford Recalls 221,000 Police Vehicles, Ambulances And Hearses
- Kia Recalls 209,000 Soul Vehicles For Accelerator Defect
- NHTSA Investigates Nissan Air Bag Fix As Complaints Increase
Recalls Update - May 5, 2015 8:14 - 0 Comments
More In Recalls Update
- Blue Bell Creameries Issues Recalls Of All Products
- Beech-Nut Nutrition Issues Baby Food Recall Nationwide After Glass Found In Jar
- 1.5 Million Bottles Of Mislabeled Mucinex Recalled
- Roberta Roller Rabbit Recalls Children’s Pajama Sets
- Children’s Pajamas Recalled By Smooth Industries Due To Violation Of Federal Flammability Standard