Insurance and Finance Update - Written by Beasley Allen on Thursday, December 17, 2009 11:56 - 13 Comments
MetLife has agreed to pay $50 million to settle a class action claim that it defrauded 8.6 million policy holders when it converted from a mutual company in 2000 to one that is publicly traded. The settlement was reached after a jury had been selected in a case, and after Judge Jack B. Weinstein, the trial judge, ruled that MetLife could introduce a 103-page decision of the New York State Superintendent of Insurance approving both the conversion itself and the disclosure documents that MetLife had mailed to its policyholders. Judge Weinstein expressed skepticism about the strength of the Plaintiffs’ case and that led to the settlement.
The settlement also resolves a state-court class action pending in Manhattan. The two class actions in New York are the last of nine lawsuits filed against MetLife charging that the conversion was tainted with fraud. The other seven lawsuits were dismissed. Judge Weinstein set a hearing on the fairness of the settlement for the 30th of this month.
If approved, class members will not receive direct payments as a result of the settlement. Instead, the amount set aside at the time of the conversion to continue generating dividends for policyholders whose policies entitled them to receive dividends will be augmented by what remains of the $50 million after payment of expenses and attorney’s fees. The settlement also invokes the cy pres doctrine to provide for a $2.5 million payment to a nonprofit health research organization in lieu of compensation to those policyholders who did not have a right to receive dividends.
The class in the federal lawsuit claimed that MetLife violated federal securities laws by making significant omissions and misleading statements in materials sent to policyholders to win their support for the conversion. A majority of 93% approved the conversion in April 2000. Before ordering a fairness hearing, Judge Weinstein issued an opinion on the proposed settlement, finding it “probable” that the settlement will be found “fair, reasonable and adequate.”
According to the formula used in the notice to the class, the lawyers for federal Plaintiffs estimated the class would recover $8 billion if it prevailed on all claims. MetLife’s lawyers reported that the federal class would receive nothing even if it prevailed on all its claims. So there was a large range both between the two estimates and also between the amount claimed by the Plaintiffs and the settlement amount.
The lawyers for the state class estimated that its claims were worth between $400 million and $1.6 billion. Judge Weinstein wrote in his opinion that the settlement appears to have reached “an appropriate balance of the risks and benefits for all of those involved in this complex litigation.” A special master was appointed by the court to explore settlement possibilities with the parties.
Leave a Reply
- A Report On A Deadly Chemical Leak At A Site In Texas
- The Role of a Trial Lawyer
- Favorite Bible Verses
- Sandy Hook Families File Wrongful Death Lawsuit
- GM Recalls Vehicles For Headlight Problem
- Daiichi Sankyo Agrees to Pay $39 Million to Settle Whistleblower Lawsuit
- District Court Sanctions Ghostwriting Of Expert Reports
- IIHS List Of Safest Cars Grows Amid Record Recalls In The U.S.
- NHTSA Needs Adequate Resources To Do Its Job
- Former NHTSA Employees Join Takata Air Bag Defect Panel
- BMW Will Replace Airbags Nationwide
- GM Recalls 83,000 SUVs And Trucks For Faulty Ignitions
- GM Gets 108 More Claims For Defective Ignition Switch Compensation
- Koch Brothers Set $889 Million Budget For Lead-Up To 2016
- Whistleblower Wins Supreme Court Ruling
- Pfizer Pays $400 Million To End Shareholder Suit
- Study Author Says Autism Risk Linked To Chemicals
- Multi-State Dog Fighting Ring Ordered To Pay $2 Million Restitution
- In 2005 August 12th my husband commited suicide after being on Lexapro. I notice...
- Anthony Franco, the last part of your paragraph is absolutely not true, the new ...
- I have been searching for something like this ... I have worked 50 to 65 hours p...
- 2005 F150 Supercrew: I have replaced 3 out of 4 and the last regulator is broken...
- i understand that wat has happened but it is also the owner of said vehicle to d...
- I was prescribed Plavix from Sept 2003 through
Aug 2010 and suffered several he...
- my mazda has been in the shop for over 200 days in 8 months turbo charger ,motor...
- Does Beasley and Alan handle whistleblower cases if the government has made a d...
Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments
More In Recent Settlements
- A Further Update On The AWP Litigation
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Fort McClellan Radio Tower Collapse Case
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Sikorsky Helicopter Crash
- The Philadelphia Story
- St. Croix, Virgin Islands Settlement
Product Liability - Feb 9, 2015 14:42 - 0 Comments
More In Product Liability
- Recalls Of Cars Abroad Prompt No Urgency In United States
- FHWA Opens Website For Public Reporting Of Guardrail Flaws
- Lawyers In Our Firm Settle Industrial Machine Design Case
- Aging and Dangerous Tires On Our School Buses
- Toyota Ordered to Pay $11 Million in U.S. Trial Over Fatal Sudden Unintended Acceleration Crash
Recalls Update - Feb 9, 2015 9:36 - 0 Comments
More In Recalls Update
- Johnson Health Tech Recalls Matrix Fitness Strength Training Machines
- Cleaner And Degreaser Recalled For Chemical Hazard
- NPD Furniture Recalls Dining Chairs Due To Fall Hazard
- Children’s Pajamas Recalled By Star Ride Kids
- CoScentrix Expands Recall Of DD Brand Candles