Product Liability - Written by Jere Beasley on Wednesday, June 3, 2009 7:26 - 0 Comments
Consumer Union advocates backup cameras
Rear blind zones are a serious safety issue. According to federal statistics, about 228 people were backed over in 2008 in this country when drivers couldn’t see them. Based on its years of experience with backup cameras and sensor systems, Consumers Union recommends a regulation be crafted to mandate such systems in order to remove deadly blind zones behind cars. In public comments made this week to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Consumers Union, parent of Consumer Reports, recommended the agency adopt a standard requiring backup cameras and passive sensors to alert drivers when they need to look at the rear-view screen.
Consumers Union says in its testing it found that no single system offers a perfect solution. Radar-based sensor systems generate frequent false alarms and also fail to warn drivers when a small object is near the back of the car. Too many false alarms can cause drivers to ignore the system when an alarm is actually justified. It’s also known that drivers don’t always look at video cameras. As a result, it was requested that the standard include requirements for screen clarity and size based on how far the screen is from the driver’s eyes. While displays in a rear-view mirror can work well, some dashboard displays can be too small. The Toyota Venza was given as an example. It’s estimated that the manufacturer’s cost of a camera system shouldn’t exceed $100.
Consumers Union also believes that any standard needs to limit the delay between when the car is shifted into reverse and when the rear-view image appears on the screen. In some new-car systems that they have tested, it was reported that it takes several seconds for the image to appear after the car is put in reverse, making it long after you’ve started moving. In others, the dashboard screen won’t display any image until the driver has accepted a legal disclaimer that appears every time the car is started. Consumer Reports has measured the blind zone behind cars for several years. For some SUVs and pickups, a short driver may not be able to see what is behind the rear bumper for up to 50 feet behind the vehicle. In addition, it was found that while some aftermarket camera systems work well, some inexpensive aftermarket backup cameras aren’t durable, and some systems can be difficult to install.
Source: Consumer Reports
- Building Oaks of Righteousness
- Yaz litigation continues to grow
- Health care fraud costs are huge
- FBI warned about mortgage fraud problem in 2004
- Toyota has massive safety issues
- Chevrolet Cobalt Steering Complaints Being Investigated
- A Message From Alabama State Bar Association President Tom Methvin
- Beasley Allen lawyer travels to Washington for hearings
- Living the Victorious Christian Life
- A Monthly Reminder
- A Bad Scene in Washington
- Pride Leads to Arrogance
- Favorite Bible Verse
- Nice Guys Don’t Always Finish Last
- A Message From Alabama State Bar President Tom Methvin
- March For Babies 2010 Coming Soon
- Valentine Cards Delivered to Brantwood
- LawCall Is Still Getting Lots of Attention
- 3/10.2010
Attorney Jeremy Hancock Cullman, AL was appointed as attorney for tee...
- My daughter who is in the US Navy drove approx.....5 hours from NJ on her way to...
- Thanks for all the information. I have intended to buy a Prius when I think it i...
- The case has not yet gone to court. We will continue to follow the case and pro...
- I think one of the most important things chemical reform can do to protect us is...
- Who won this case?...
- Any idea about final payment for for us less important stroke victims?
Thanx....
- I have a 2005 explorer that is doing the same thing, plus the coast button actua...
- Beasley Allen
- Jere Beasley Report
- Extreme Montgomery
- Legal Strategies
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Coal Ash Spill
- Serious Injuries
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Denied Disability
- Morgan Keegan Fraud
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Toyota Unintended Acceleration
- Gadolinium and NSF
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Yaz Side Effects
- Steven Johnson Syndrome
- Fleet Attorney
- Trasylol Recall
- Pain Pumps
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Gardasil
- Lantus Attorney
- Chantix Recall
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Heparin Recall
- Reglan Lawyer
- Digitek Recall
- Antibiotics
Recent Settlements - Sep 3, 2009 12:59 - 0 Comments
Wal-Mart parking lot case is settled
More In Recent Settlements
- Interstate death case settles
- Mississippi case involving man crushed by pipe won on appeal
- Death case settled in Troy, Alabama
- Oral Sodium Phosphate Litigation
- Road Rage case settles in an Alabama Court
Featured, Toyota Litigation Update - Mar 15, 2010 8:00 - 0 Comments
Beasley Allen lawyer travels to Washington for hearings
More In Product Liability
- Jury Awards Woman $23.4 Million Against Ford Motor Co.
- Ford Liable for Defective Fuel Tank
- Caterpiller must Pay $54 Million to Paralyzed Texas Worker
- Machine Hazards are a Serious Safety Risk for Workers
- Honda Adds Vehicled to Recall Over Airbags
Recalls Update - Mar 4, 2010 11:30 - 0 Comments
Innovage LLC Recalls Discovery Lamps for Children Due To Fire and Burn Hazards
More In Recalls Update
- Generation 2 Worldwide and “ChildESIGNS” Drop Side Crib Brands Recalled
- Products Made For Children in China Pulled From Stores in U.S.
- Chrysler to Fix Airbags in Some 355,500 Minivans
- Hyundai Issues Voluntary Recall on Sonata Sedan
- Honda Launches Recall to Repair Airbags
Leave a Reply