The highest appeals court in Massachusetts has ruled that a livery company and its driver in Boston could be held liable in a fatal car accident caused by a drunken passenger after he left the livery van. The Supreme Judicial Court found that Ultimate Livery Service Inc., located in Boston, and its driver, Richard Broderick, could be found to be at fault in a 2001 accident that killed an off-duty Boston police officer and left several other people with serious injuries. The court said Broderick should not have dropped off a drunken passenger at a location where he would likely get into a car and drive.
William Powers, along with five other men, had hired Ultimate to take them to a bachelor party on the night of August 11, 2001. The driver picked them up in a 15-passenger van at a South Boston sports bar, took them to a strip club in Rhode Island, and then drove them back to the sports bar. The men drank in both bars and during the ride to and from Rhode Island. Powers, joined by two of the men, drove away after being dropped off and collided with another car at an intersection. The crash killed Sean Waters, an off-duty police officer who was a passenger in the other car. Passengers in both cars were injured.
Lawsuits were filed by the officer’s estate and the injured passengers, claiming that Ultimate and its driver were at fault for allowing Powers to leave the van at the Boston bar when they knew, or should have known, that he was likely to drive a car while intoxicated. A Superior Court judge dismissed the lawsuits, finding that Ultimate and the driver were not responsible for the conduct of the passenger once he left the van. But the appeals court, in reversing that ruling, found that Ultimate and its driver, “owed a duty” to the occupants of both cars. The ruling will permit the negligence claims to go to trial in a lower court to determine if damages should be paid. The court’s opinion stated:
Broderick knew, or should have known, that Powers was intoxicated, yet he allowed Powers to make his own judgment about driving, failing to take any reasonable precautions to prevent him from doing so. A jury could conclude that Ultimate and Broderick were negligent when they left Powers at a location where he would likely drive and pose an extreme danger to the public.
The court also found that Ultimate’s insurer, Commerce Insurance Co., is required to cover the claims made by the passengers. A national trade association said it was concerned that the ruling appears to require livery companies to substitute their judgment for the judgment of its passengers. Michael B. Bogdanow, the Boston lawyer who represented the mother of the police officer who was killed in the accident, says many livery companies market their services to people who plan to drink heavily. In this regard, he added:
They know that their passengers are drinking to the point of intoxication where they cannot safely drive and they cannot even safely make the decision about whether to drive. Given that, the transportation service should know better than to simply leave someone at their car.
This decision will certainly get the attention of companies that sell their services, including the use of vehicles, to groups. It most likely will have a limited application to situations where the use of alcohol is involved and passengers are transported. In fact, it may well be limited in application to cases with almost identical facts.
Source: Insurance Journal
Contact us today for a free legal consultation with an experienced attorney.
Fields marked *may be required for submission.
If you would like to subscribe to the Jere Beasley Report digital edition, simply visit our Subscriptions page and provide the necessary information or call us at 800-898-2034.
Attorney Advertising - Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.