The Corporate World - Written by Jere Beasley on Thursday, November 6, 2008 15:19 - 0 Comments
Wachovia settles telemarketer suits for $200 million
Wachovia Corp., which is being bought by Wells Fargo & Co., has agreed to pay $200 million to settle lawsuits claiming it profited by ignoring fraudulent telemarketers who used the bank to help them steal from consumers. Victims of the telemarketing frauds filed suit in federal court in Philadelphia in 2007, claiming that Wachovia knew of claims the telemarketers were using “demand drafts,” or unsigned checks, to steal from their victims. The suits were filed on behalf of all people in the country who lost money to the telemarketers between June 2003 and February 2006. The settlement, which must be approved by the court before it can take effect, will reimburse $163 million the victims lost to the fraud, plus bank fees. In papers filed seeking approval of the settlement it was stated: “This settlement presents the rare instance in which class members have the opportunity to be made whole from any losses resulting from Defendants’ conduct.”
The settlement follows an April agreement to resolve a probe by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency into Wachovia’s relationship to payment processors who serve telemarketers. Under the April settlement, Wachovia agreed to offer restitution of at least $125 million to all consumers who lost money on demand drafts processed by the bank. Wachovia had lots of problems – caused mostly by greed – and this settlement reveals the corporate culture of corruption that has existed in the boardrooms of many financial institutions.
In the Wachovia telemarketer fraud suit, unscrupulous telemarketers called consumers, many of them elderly, offering worthless products, including phony coupons, gift certificates and information about government grants. The telemarketers then persuaded the consumers to disclose information about their bank accounts, which the telemarketers used to make fraudulent charges through payment processors that had accounts at Wachovia. The payment processors generated demand drafts with a notice stating “authorized by drawer” in place of a signature. The victims claimed Wachovia failed to close the accounts because it was profiting from fees imposed when many of the consumers discovered the charges and rejected the transactions.
Reimbursement checks will be sent directly to the victims, which is quite unusual, and that’s a good thing. Most similar class-action settlements require claimants to fill out and mail forms or follow other complex procedures that sometimes reduce participation in settlements to about 10%. Victims can also make claims for reimbursement of any bank fees. It will be interesting to see how this settlement works out.
Source: Bloomberg
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Jere Beasley Report
- Extreme Montgomery
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Coal Ash Spill
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Employee Rights
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Pain Pumps
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Digitek Recall
- Reglan Lawyer
- Chantix Recall
- Heparin Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Fleet Attorney
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Trasylol Recall
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
Leave a Reply