A Final Look at State Politics - Written by Jere Beasley on Monday, November 3, 2008 10:12 - 0 Comments
The third party smear machines
Folks in Alabama are asking what the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) is. They are also asking why are they interested in the Alabama Supreme Court race this year. For the uninformed amongst us, CFIC is a corporate-funded, tort-reform group that relies largely on negative campaign advertising leveled against Supreme Court candidates in states like Alabama. Founded in 1998, CFIF is little more than a store-front operation based outside Washington D.C. It’s run by a group of lobbyists, political operatives and corporate lawyers who refuse to disclose the organization’s donors. There is a very simple reason why it won’t say where its money comes from. Its funds come from the giant oil, insurance, and drug companies whose goal has been to destroy the civil justice system in this country. They are all interested in protecting themselves in litigation caused by their wrongdoing.
CFIF has repeatedly run afoul of elections laws in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and elsewhere. It has been taken to court repeatedly by elections officials who were trying to put a halt to their illegal campaign activities conducted in states’ judicial elections. When you consider that CFIF enjoys tax exempt status, its involvement in partisan politics is wrong – can’t be explained – and shouldn’t be tolerated. I am shocked that the Justice Department doesn’t put a stop to the group’s political smear tactics in states like Alabama.
If you want more information concerning the history of this well-financed front group, consider the following:
- ExxonMobil Lawyers run the show at CFIF. The ex-CFIF Secretary and Treasurer Guy Vander Jagt was a lawyer with a Cleveland law firm, Baker & Hostetler LLP, whose top clients include ExxonMobil and Chevron, in addition to big insurance companies, banks and Wall Street players like Morgan Stanley, Progressive, State Farm and Wachovia.
- CFIF has lobbied Pro-Oil Positions to Congress. The CFIF’s high-powered lobbyists fought against higher taxes on record oil company profits and renewable fuels. It has worked on numerous projects to benefit the oil companies.
- Extraordinary Financing from Oil-Backed Foundations. CFIF has received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Carthage Foundation. Carthage is part of the Richard Mellon Scaife foundations, which are in turn funded by family oil (Gulf Oil), chemical, banking and other corporate interests.
- In its earliest days, tobacco money was put into CFIF and then funneled into political races. CFIF operatives sought funding from the major tobacco companies as they fought state lawsuits.
- CFIF has close ties to Gambling Interests. The original executive director of CFIF is Eric Schippers, executive vice president of Penn National Gaming, one of the country’s major slots parlor and racetrack operators.
- CFIF General Counsel Tied to National Manufacturers Association. CFIF lawyer Renee Giachino was also a top lawyer with the American Justice Partnership, a law “association” created by the National Manufacturers Association.
- CFIF Partner – the American Justice Partnership – Routinely Give Low Rankings to Judges it Does Not Support. In a report called the Activist Journey of the Florida Supreme Court an affiliate of CFIF rated state judges in Florida on whether they expanded or “made law” or whether they were conservative and “exercised judicial restraint.” These phony ratings proved to be very effective.
- Pro-Corporate, Neo-Conservative. According to New York political media, the Center works closely with “pro-corporate and neo-conservative” groups such as the National Center for Policy Research, which receives hundreds of thousands of dollars in funding from ExxonMobil.
In the Alabama Supreme Court race this year, giant corporate donors – including ExxonMobil – have funneled millions of dollars into our state through CFIF knowing that outfit won’t have to disclose either the amounts received or the names of donors. While that is permissible under Alabama law, it’s still as wrong as wrong can be. What interest could these corporations possibly have in the Alabama Supreme Court? Why do they want to hide their names from the voters? These are questions CFIF won’t answer and neither will its corporate donors! But, these are answers that the voters should have before casting their ballots.
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Jere Beasley Report
- Extreme Montgomery
- Coal Ash Spill
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Employee Rights
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Heparin Recall
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Chantix Recall
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Pain Pumps
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Digitek Recall
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Reglan Lawyer
- Trasylol Recall
- Fleet Attorney
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
Leave a Reply