Mass Torts Update - Written by Jere Beasley on Wednesday, November 19, 2008 14:50 - 0 Comments
Johnson & Johnson paid $68 million to settle birth control cases
Johnson & Johnson has settled hundreds of lawsuits filed by women who suffered blood clots, heart attacks or strokes after using the company’s Ortho Evra birth control patch. The drug manufacturer, the world’s largest maker of health-care products, has paid in confidential settlements. The financial details of the settlements to investors haven’t been released. Of 562 complaints reviewed by Bloomberg News, the vast majority of users alleged the patch caused deep-vein thrombosis, or blood clots in the legs, and pulmonary embolisms, or blood clots in the lungs. Some blamed it for heart attacks or strokes. The complaints filed blamed Ortho Evra for the deaths of 20 women. The litigation before U.S. District Judge David Katz in Toledo, Ohio, where 1,330 cases were consolidated, is being watched closely.
Complaints filed on behalf of 4,000 women in state and federal courts contend that the company hid or altered data about the risks of high levels of estrogen released by Ortho Evra. More than 5 million women have used the patch since sales began in 2002. The New Brunswick, New Jersey-based company voluntarily strengthened the warning label in 2005, 2006 and 2008 with the approval of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
J&J, which makes diaphragms and birth-control pills, developed the patch as an alternative method of hormonal birth control for women who might forget to take their pills daily. The company reports sales of the Ortho Evra patch with those of its birth control pills, folding both into overall sales of hormonal contraceptives. J&J reported 2007 sales of $900 million for that category, a decrease of 9%. The company’s total revenue was $61.1 billion. J&J’s annual report cited “a significant decline” in Ortho Evra sales because of “labeling changes and negative media coverage concerning product safety.”
Public Citizen’s Health Research Group, a Washington-based advocacy organization, petitioned the FDA in May to ban the patch within six months, even after the three label changes. Sidney Wolfe, Director of the Research Group, had this to say relating to the patch:
It still has dangerously high levels of estrogen. There are no unique benefits. If there is a drug with no unique benefits, and it has unique risks, and there are alternatives, why should anyone use it? What is the purpose of the FDA if not to regulate products like that?
The company’s current label warns that Ortho Evra exposes women to 60% more estrogen than the typical birth control pill and that higher estrogen increases side effects. Studies show Ortho Evra can double the risk of serious blood clots compared with the pill, according to the label. If you want more information on this matter you can contact Chad Cook at 800-898-2034.
Source: Bloomberg
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Extreme Montgomery
- Jere Beasley Report
- Coal Ash Spill
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Employee Rights
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Heparin Recall
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Chantix Recall
- Fleet Attorney
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Pain Pumps
- Vytorin Cancer
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Digitek Recall
- Reglan Lawyer
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Trasylol Recall
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Fosamax and ONJ
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
Leave a Reply