Environmental Concerns - Written by Jere Beasley on Tuesday, November 25, 2008 10:59 - 0 Comments
Court finds Exxon ignored Asbestos warnings and put workers at risk
The Louisiana First Court of Appeals has upheld a trial court jury’s finding that despite being aware of the dangers of asbestos in its Louisiana riverboats, chemical plants, and oil refineries as early as 1937, ExxonMobil Corporation failed to implement any type of safety measures to protect its workers. The court affirmed a trial court’s 2006 judgment awarding substantial damages to the family of a former Exxon employee who died of mesothelioma, an asbestos-related cancer. Renee Melancon, a lawyer with Baron & Budd, P.C., who represented the Plaintiff, had this to say:
Exxon’s own documents reveal that the company knew that the use of asbestos insulation in the petroleum industry was hazardous to workers like our client. Exxon even outlined a strategy for minimizing asbestos exposure in its facilities in 1937, but just never bothered to follow through on the plan to protect its workers.
The Plaintiff, Bruce Spillman of Baton Rouge, worked on Exxon towboats from 1945 to 1949 and was exposed to asbestos when he spent time in the boats’ engine rooms. From 1949 until 1986, he worked as a helper, then a welder, in Exxon’s Baton Rouge oil refinery, where he continued to be exposed to pipes insulated with asbestos. Despite the 1949 warnings of its own industrial hygienist about asbestos, Exxon neither alerted its workers to any danger nor instructed them to wear masks. Mr. Spillman was diagnosed in 2005 with mesothelioma, a painful and extremely aggressive cancer that causes the lining around the lungs to thicken and harden. He died later the same year.
Exxon attempted to claim immunity from the lawsuit based on Louisiana workers’ compensation statutes. But, the appeals court rejected that argument and reaffirmed its earlier ruling that Louisiana’s Workers’ Compensation Act does not cover mesothelioma, and as a result does not bar suits by mesothelioma victims against their employers for claims that accrued before 1975. The law was amended to cover that disease in 1975. In addition, the court held that the Plaintiff’s evidence was more than sufficient to establish that Exxon knew of the need to protect its workers from exposure to asbestos. The oil giant was responsible for exposing its employees to dangerously high levels of asbestos without any respiratory protection. Exxon worked hard to evade its legal responsibility in this case. Fortunately the powerful oil giant failed.
Source: PR Newswire
- Jere Beasley Report, April 2013
- Marc McHenry Hired As Investigator
- Title Loans and Payday Loans are Bad News for Borrowers
- Alabama to Receive $1,039,078 in Multi-State Settlement
- COSTCO Recalls Gold Coast Crab Dip
- Major Banks Assist In Payday Loans Banned By States
- We Have Allowed A Culture Of Violence To Be Created In The U.S.
- Parting Words
- Closing Observations
- Favorite Bible Verses
- WSFA News Defenders Interviews
- Beasley Allen Hosts The Child Safety Helmet Giveaway
- SPLC Looks At How Payday And Title Loans Prey On Alabama’s Poorest
- Employee Spotlights
- Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods
- Winn-Dixie Recalls Organic Apple Juice On Mold Fears
- Manda Packing Recalling 468,000 Pounds Of Meat
- Carter’s Recalls Infant Clothings With Zippers Due To Choking Hazard
- The rate has now risen to over 6%...
- Its really not easy to payback any kind of loan, I always recommend all my frien...
- Same as above, with all the nightmares. I was Modifying with Wells Fargo and i s...
- I am shocked to see what I am reading - but not surprised. I installed Certain...
- I work as a store manager and i work 60 to ninety hours a weeks please tell me s...
- I wondered why i couldn't find him on the DPS website.
Tell Marc to contact me...
- I want to be involved in this lawsuit. I was a 3rd key making $8.25 per hour wi...
- Great to find a site like this that informs us of what our tax dollars are payin...
Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments
Settlement In BTSI Defect Case
More In Recent Settlements
- A Further Update On The AWP Litigation
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Fort McClellan Radio Tower Collapse Case
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Sikorsky Helicopter Crash
- The Philadelphia Story
- St. Croix, Virgin Islands Settlement
Liability, Personal Injury, Product Liability - May 2, 2013 8:56 - 0 Comments
Kentucky Jury Awards Significant Damages In Defective Cochlear Implant Case
More In Product Liability
- Colorado Jury Finds Helmet Maker Riddell At Fault
- Remington Model 700 Misfires
- Submersion Lawsuit Highlights Escape Design Gaps
- Ford Ordered To Pay Driver $3 Million For Injuries In 2009 Crash
- Court Upholds $33 Million Verdict In Fatal Van Rollover Against Cooper Tire
Recalls Update - May 3, 2013 9:23 - 0 Comments
Natura Pet Expands Recall Of Dry Pet Foods
More In Recalls Update
- Winn-Dixie Recalls Organic Apple Juice On Mold Fears
- Manda Packing Recalling 468,000 Pounds Of Meat
- Carter’s Recalls Infant Clothings With Zippers Due To Choking Hazard
- Small World Toys Recalls Spin-A-Mals Farm And Safari Puzzles
- Infant Froggy Socks Sold At Cracker Barrel Recalled
Leave a Reply