Court Watch - Written by Jere Beasley on Thursday, October 2, 2008 10:47 - 0 Comments
Partial settlement reached in Exxon Valdez case
Part of the punitive damages awarded to Plaintiffs in the nation’s worst oil spill will be paid to Alaska fishermen and other Plaintiffs, by ExxonMobil. A settlement was reached in the Exxon Valdez case which means about $383 million will be released by Exxon. Under the agreement, the money will be distributed to nearly 33,000 commercial fishermen and others who sued Exxon after the 1989 oil spill. ExxonMobil was able to get the Plaintiffs’ lawyers to agree on the company’s offer to pay the punitive damages awarded by the Supreme Court on June 25th, less certain costs and amounts relating to earlier settlements with former Plaintiffs. The agreed-upon amount with the Plaintiffs is approximately $383.4 million.
David Oesting of Anchorage, the lead lawyer for the Plaintiffs, told the Anchorage Daily News he and lawyers for Exxon negotiated the settlement. Lawyers will continue to negotiate over $70 million and nearly a half billion dollars in interest. Fishermen and other Plaintiffs should see checks coming in beginning this month. Interest calculated since 1994 would add an estimated $488 million, boosting awards to individuals from roughly $15,000 to about $29,400. Of course, Exxon contends it does not have to pay interest. Frank Mullen, a Homer, Alaska, commercial fisherman, had this to say concerning the payments: “It’s a damn small bone for an old, angry dog is what it is.” History will record this legislation as a tremendous victory for Exxon and a bitter loss for lots of folks who were its victims.
Source: Anchorage Daily News
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Extreme Montgomery
- Jere Beasley Report
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Coal Ash Spill
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Employee Rights
- Reglan Lawyer
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Heparin Recall
- Pain Pumps
- Digitek Recall
- Trasylol Recall
- Fleet Attorney
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Chantix Recall
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
Leave a Reply