Nursing Home Update - Written by Jere Beasley on Monday, October 13, 2008 9:52 - 0 Comments
Nursing home industry launches campaign of deception
The nursing home industry has gone all out to defeat legislation to help protect residents of nursing homes and assisted living facilities from abuse and neglect. The industry launched a campaign of deception about the legislation. The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to mark up S. 2838, the Fairness in Nursing Home Arbitration Act, sponsored by Sens. Mel Martinez (R-FL) and Herbert Kohl (D-WI). If passed, the bill would make pre-dispute binding mandatory arbitration provisions unenforceable in nursing home contracts. The House Judiciary Committee approved the measure in July. Buried in the fine print of admissions contracts, these arbitration clauses strip elderly residents and their families of the right to take nursing homes to court in cases of abuse or neglect – a critical tool in prompting nursing homes to take better care of residents. Instead, any disputes must be brought in a private, expensive, secretive forum chosen by the nursing home, giving the arbitration firm an incentive to favor the nursing home company that brings it business. A 2007 Public Citizen study of 34,000 credit card arbitration cases showed that businesses won 94.7% of cases against consumers.
Most people are unaware of arbitration provisions in the fine print of nursing-home admissions documents and do not understand them. The clauses also are typically non-negotiable. For these reasons, businesses can use arbitration “agreements” to immunize themselves from accountability in court for their wrongdoing. A group led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce wrote a letter last month opposing the legislation to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Judiciary Committee chairman, and Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA), ranking member of the committee. The letter is remarkable in the extent of its deception.
The authors claim to be a “diverse coalition of senior, caregiver, taxpayer, and business advocacy organizations” and claim they wish to protect consumers. But nearly all those listed as signers are business and professional associations whose goals are to maximize profits and limit corporate accountability for wrongdoing. The groups also misrepresent what the legislation would do. They erroneously claim that the Fairness in Nursing Home Arbitration Act would “eliminate or significantly limit the use of arbitration.” In fact, the bill would actually allow consumers to choose whether to go to arbitration or court to resolve disputes, meaning that businesses couldn’t force people into unfair arbitrations.
A truly broad coalition of groups that advocate on behalf of consumers, senior citizens and employees also sent a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee, urging support for the bill. More than 100 organizations from 30 states, including Public Citizen, signed on to the letter to support protecting the rights of nursing home residents and their families. David Arkush, director of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division, had this to say:
It’s appalling that the nursing home industry is fighting against senior citizens under the banner of consumer protection. But the level of dishonesty reflects the disgrace in their position. It wouldn’t work if they told the truth. “We corporate lobbyists oppose this bill because our multimillion-dollar corporate clients want immunity when they abuse or neglect some of America’s most vulnerable citizens.” If arbitration is good for consumers, then they will choose it. There is no justification for forcing it on people.
Commonly-reported nursing home injuries include pressure sores that lead to infection and amputation of limbs, suffocation on bedrails and other restraining devices, physical and sexual assault, renal failure from dehydration, malnutrition, and death from fires in buildings lacking sprinkler systems. According to a 2007 report by the Government Accountability Office, almost half of states cited more than 20% of their nursing homes for serious deficiencies in 2006; six states cited 30% or more for dangerous conditions or harming residents.
Source: Public Citizen
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Jere Beasley Report
- Extreme Montgomery
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Coal Ash Spill
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Employee Rights
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Chantix Recall
- Heparin Recall
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Vytorin Cancer
- Reglan Lawyer
- Trasylol Recall
- Digitek Recall
- Fleet Attorney
- Pain Pumps
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
Leave a Reply