Enviromental Concerns - Written by Jere Beasley on Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:23 - 0 Comments
Judge rules for polluted Kansas town and against big oil
At the conclusion of one of the longest jury trials ever held in Kansas, a jury in January left residents in a southeast city stunned. The panel had decided that the city of Neodesha was not entitled to recover the costs of cleanup and damage from contamination caused by an oil refinery. However, the judge who presided over the 17-week trial recently gave the town new hope, when he overturned the jury verdict. The judge concluded that he had given the jury improper instructions.
Allen County District Judge Daniel Creitz said strict liability for the contamination was not a question of fact for the jury to decide, but instead was a question of law and that the city was entitled to judgment in its favor as a matter of law. As a result, the jury should only have been instructed to determine damages to be paid by oil giant BP Corp. North America and its predecessors. Judge Creitz ordered a new trial to consider only on the issue of damages. The original lawsuit was filed in 2004 on behalf of the 2,700 residents as well as government entities and businesses in the southeast Kansas city. The plaintiffs sought nearly $478 million for cleanup costs and damages, plus interest, as well as punitive damages.
The contamination covers almost 70 percent of the town, including underneath City Hall, schools and hundreds of homes. Experts found groundwater pollution under 350 acres after the city spent $1 million to hire its own experts and drill test wells. The refinery, which operated from 1897 until it was dismantled in 1970, generated wastes and byproducts include benzene, toluene, ethel benzene and exylenes, polyaromatic hydrocarbons and metals such as arsenic, chromium, lead and mercury. Although some of the contaminants are known to cause cancer and other diseases, the lawsuit was not a personal injury case but instead sought property damages.
At trial, the Defendants contended they were at least partly responsible for the groundwater contamination, but were actively cleaning up the pollution under the direction of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. In his ruling, Judge Creitz said the company’s claimed cooperation with state health officials was not a defense to the claims of property owners for damages and other relief. The judge said in his order:
Given the Defendants’ admissions and the evidence here, no rational juror could return a verdict stating that Defendants were not guilty of contaminating the groundwater underneath Neodesha. The contaminants involved in this case are some of the most dangerous known to mankind.
The judge noted that many defense experts conceded at trial that it was the Plaintiffs’ expensive investigation, after the lawsuit was filed, that identified the refinery pollution spreading beyond the plume identified by the company’s engineers and approved by state health officials. On September 22nd, the judge gave BP ten days to appeal his decision.
Source: Insurance Journal
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Extreme Montgomery
- Jere Beasley Report
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Coal Ash Spill
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Employee Rights
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Trasylol Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Heparin Recall
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Chantix Recall
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Fleet Attorney
- Reglan Lawyer
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Digitek Recall
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Pain Pumps
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
Leave a Reply