The Consumer Corner - Written by Jere Beasley on Thursday, September 25, 2008 9:10 - 0 Comments
Fight against toxic chemicals may expand
As you may recall, the State of Maine passed legislation earlier this year that gave the state the authority to broadly identify and investigate “chemicals of high concern” in consumer products, particularly those that may reach children. The bill, signed into law in April, made Maine the first state in this country to have such authority. Hopefully, it will serve as a model for other states trying to fill a regulatory void left by the federal Environmental Protection Agency. It’s become quite obvious that the EPA isn’t able – or willing – to do what’s necessary in this area of concern.
Just five chemicals out of 82,000 known to be hazardous to human health, for instance, have been banned by the EPA since 1976, the most recent being asbestos in 1989. Maine’s law coincides with mounting concerns in the United States over chemicals found in everyday products, from cars to clothes, and follows similar European Union laws. The EU in 1999 banned phthalates — chemicals used to make plastic more flexible — and last year implemented a law known as REACH (Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals) that requires businesses to prove substances in everyday products are safe and submit data about them. Maine’s bill follows closely the EU approach, requiring makers of toxic chemicals to notify state authorities of the quantity and purpose of the chemicals and work to develop safer alternatives.
Since the EPA isn’t doing its job, many experts believe Maine’s law will lead to tougher measures nationwide. Under the law, Maine will test chemicals and issue a “certificate of non-compliance” to manufacturers stating their chemicals do not meet state laws. The state can notify retailers that a product contains toxic chemicals and legislation can be approved to ban its sale. Environmentalists in Maine say there is growing evidence that harmful toxic chemicals are working their way into the state’s ecosystem. A recent study, conducted at the BioDiversity Research Institute in Gorham, Maine, found some extremely disturbing evidence that confirmed the fears.
Other U.S. states have also begun to act on chemicals in consumer products. The state of Washington signed into law on April 1st legislation that places restrictions on the manufacture of children’s products containing lead, cadmium and phthalates. In February, the Massachusetts Senate approved a bill to identify dangerous chemicals in household goods, but the legislation has yet to be passed into law. In 2007, Washington became the first state to ban toxic flame retardants, and California banned toys containing phthalates. Lawmakers in Maryland, Nebraska and Hawaii have been considering bills similar to Maine’s legislation. Until the federal government does its job on a national scale, the states will have to take action to protect their citizens.
Source: Reuters
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Extreme Montgomery
- Jere Beasley Report
- Coal Ash Spill
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Employee Rights
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Trasylol Recall
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Pain Pumps
- Fleet Attorney
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Reglan Lawyer
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Chantix Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Digitek Recall
- Heparin Recall
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
Leave a Reply