Court Watch - Written by Jere Beasley on Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:27 - 1 Comment
Candidate for the Alabama Supreme Court calls for appointed judiciary
Deborah Bell Paseur, the Democratic candidate for the Alabama Supreme Court, favors appointing judges and letting voters decide if they should be retained. The Florence judge told the Birmingham chapter of The Federalist Society that the current system of partisan politics has led to judicial races that are too nasty and expensive. That, she said, has contributed to the public perception that “justice is for sale.” The suggested change would allow appellate judges to be chosen based on their qualifications. Of course, Alabamians would not lose their right to vote because they would decide each term whether the judge should keep the job, she said.
Judge Paseur, the first woman to practice law and to become a judge in Lauderdale County, said she would bring to the Supreme Court the same work ethic and judicial philosophy she showed in her 27 years on the bench. According to Judge Paseur, her court, which handled both criminal and civil cases, had one of the state’s largest caseloads and highest disposition rates. Judge Paseur was re-elected four times without opposition which shows her reputation as a judge who fairly applied the law to the facts of cases and did not follow any agendas. That’s good to hear and I believe that the people of Alabama will agree.
Source: Birmingham News
1 Comment
Frank
Leave a Reply
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Extreme Montgomery
- Jere Beasley Report
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Coal Ash Spill
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Employee Rights
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Gadolinium and NSF
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Heparin Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Chantix Recall
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Trasylol Recall
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Digitek Recall
- Pain Pumps
- Fleet Attorney
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Reglan Lawyer
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
I disagree with Judge Paseur on this issue. I think that taking the original decision away from the voters and putting it in the hands of back room politicians will only lead to an increase in politicizing the selection process. It is much harder to remove a judge with a vote then it is to elect one.
By giving this decision to the politicians, you will see an increase in trading favors to get on the courts. I think the premise that giving politicians the decision will fix the money problem is ridiculous. All you will do is shift the money to the politicians who make the decisions.
We need more transparency. Why hasn’t Paseur made her donor lists available yet?