Capitol Observations - Written by Jere Beasley on Thursday, August 7, 2008 8:05 - 0 Comments
Express Scripts Settles With 28 States
Express Scripts Inc. has reached a settlement with 28 states that alleged the pharmacy benefits manager (PBM) misled consumers when it encouraged doctors to switch patients’ cholesterol drug brands under the guise of controlling costs. The agreement resolves a four-year investigation of St. Louis-based Express Scripts. This isn’t the first time a PBM has been caught cheating the government. It follows a similar $38.5 million multistate settlement in February with a rival PBM, and a 2004 drug-switching settlement with Medco Health Solutions Inc. As a result of these settlements, state attorneys general believe they “have changed how these companies treat patients and doctors when they ask to change their prescription medications.” As a part of the settlement with Express Scripts, the company must disclose full information and the reason for the proposed switch. In fact, that appears to be the most significant part of the settlement. These disclosures must be “clear and conspicuous.”
Express Scripts will pay $9.3 million of the total settlement to the states and the District of Columbia. Another $200,000 will be paid which will provide no more than $25 per claimant to individual patients to reimburse them for visits to doctors and tests linked to switches between rival brands of cholesterol-controlling drugs known as statins. The participants in the settlement are: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and the District of Columbia. The same states were involved the settlement mentioned above with Caremark’s parent company, CVS Caremark Corp. Express Scripts fraudulently told doctors in some cases that patients and their health plans would save money by switching to a different drug brand to treat the same condition. Express Scripts failed to disclose to its client plans that money earned by Express Scripts accrued from the drug switching process would be retained by the company. Instead, it wasn’t passed on to the client plan.
While the amount to be paid under the settlement was small, it’s believed by the Attorneys General that the changes brought about in how Express Scripts will operate in the future are significant. This is just another example of corporate fraud by companies dealing with government programs. There is a belief in a good number of corporate boardrooms that cheating the federal and state governments is acceptable. That sort of thing can’t be tolerated since it costs the taxpayers a great deal of money. In fact, I would like to hear somebody explain why it’s OK to cheat the government!
Source: Law.com
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Jere Beasley Report
- Extreme Montgomery
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Coal Ash Spill
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Employee Rights
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Chantix Recall
- Pain Pumps
- Trasylol Recall
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Vytorin Cancer
- Digitek Recall
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Fleet Attorney
- Heparin Recall
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Reglan Lawyer
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
Leave a Reply