Capitol Observations - Written by Jere Beasley on Thursday, August 7, 2008 8:05 - 0 Comments
Express Scripts Settles With 28 States
Express Scripts Inc. has reached a settlement with 28 states that alleged the pharmacy benefits manager (PBM) misled consumers when it encouraged doctors to switch patients’ cholesterol drug brands under the guise of controlling costs. The agreement resolves a four-year investigation of St. Louis-based Express Scripts. This isn’t the first time a PBM has been caught cheating the government. It follows a similar $38.5 million multistate settlement in February with a rival PBM, and a 2004 drug-switching settlement with Medco Health Solutions Inc. As a result of these settlements, state attorneys general believe they “have changed how these companies treat patients and doctors when they ask to change their prescription medications.” As a part of the settlement with Express Scripts, the company must disclose full information and the reason for the proposed switch. In fact, that appears to be the most significant part of the settlement. These disclosures must be “clear and conspicuous.”
Express Scripts will pay $9.3 million of the total settlement to the states and the District of Columbia. Another $200,000 will be paid which will provide no more than $25 per claimant to individual patients to reimburse them for visits to doctors and tests linked to switches between rival brands of cholesterol-controlling drugs known as statins. The participants in the settlement are: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and the District of Columbia. The same states were involved the settlement mentioned above with Caremark’s parent company, CVS Caremark Corp. Express Scripts fraudulently told doctors in some cases that patients and their health plans would save money by switching to a different drug brand to treat the same condition. Express Scripts failed to disclose to its client plans that money earned by Express Scripts accrued from the drug switching process would be retained by the company. Instead, it wasn’t passed on to the client plan.
While the amount to be paid under the settlement was small, it’s believed by the Attorneys General that the changes brought about in how Express Scripts will operate in the future are significant. This is just another example of corporate fraud by companies dealing with government programs. There is a belief in a good number of corporate boardrooms that cheating the federal and state governments is acceptable. That sort of thing can’t be tolerated since it costs the taxpayers a great deal of money. In fact, I would like to hear somebody explain why it’s OK to cheat the government!
Source: Law.com
- Other races of interest for the general election
- The other congressional races
- Candidate for the Alabama Supreme Court calls for appointed judiciary
- Citigroup may have to pay billions in buybacks
- The outlook for passage of a strong DUI bill appears to be better
- Lilly Zyprexa group buyers win class action status
- High Profile Lawsuit filed on Life Insurance Claim
- Homeowners win their Lawsuit against Farmers Insurance
- Cephalon to pay $425Million to settle Government charges
- Contessa premium foods wins Trade Secrets Case
- Judge awards $1.2 billion judgment to Johnson & Johnson
- Citigroup sues Wachovia and Wells fargo for $60 billion
- False claims Act Case pending against McKesson and Golden Horizons
- Florida sues MercK to recover money spent on Vioxx
- Johnson & Johnson paid $68 million to settle birth control cases
- Class action lawsuit says Biovail misled investors
- Missouri Court upholds $8.5 million Polio Vaccine Award
- Excellent post.Preserve the smashing work,You should definitely have to keep upd...
- First-Class post.Maintain the eminent work,You should definitely have to keep up...
- As many people know, those who undergo MRI procedures often take gadolinium, a r...
- As many people know, those who undergo MRI procedures often take gadolinium, a r...
- Thanks for the notice! It's now corrected....
- It's Hand Arendall LLC, there's no comma between Hand and Arendall...
- I understand that the first $9000 is being currently released and depending on t...
- When you say they are doing this as quickly as possible, what do you mean.? As...
- Beasley Allen Law Firm
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Southern Injury Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Support Blog
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- FLSA
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Jere Beasley Report
- Chantix Recall
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Pain Pumps
- Digitek Recall
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Vytorin Cancer
- Heparin Recall
- Trasylol Recall
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
Recent Settlements - Aug 7, 2008 14:15 - 0 Comments
North Carolina Settles Jail Fire Death Claims
More In Recent Settlements
- Settlement Of Wrongful Death Case
- GM Rollover Case Settled In Houston County
- SCOTUS Rejects Continental Carbon’s Appeal
- Roof Crush Settlement with Ford Motor Co.
Product Liability - Nov 10, 2008 10:08 - 0 Comments
Yamaha Rhino demonstrated for CPSC
More In Product Liability
- FEMA not immune from toxic trailer suits
- The overlooked hazard relating to cargo injuries
- Single vehicle accidents remain a problem
- New federal rule attempts to preemt state tort claims related to seat belt injuries
- U-haul trailers and more of the same
Recalls Update - Oct 16, 2008 8:28 - 0 Comments
190,000 Soccer goals recalled
More In Recalls Update
- Rapid Reel recalls portable garden hose carts
- Sony recalls 440,000 Vaio laptops
- Worldwise, Inc. recalls retractable dog leashes
- Warning relating to Bassinets after 2 babies are strangled
- Coffee makers recalled by Sears due to fire and burn hazards
Leave a Reply