Mass Torts - Written by Jere Beasley on Saturday, August 9, 2008 13:11 - 0 Comments
Drug Companies Want A Legal Shield
I wrote extensively about federal preemption in the Capitol Observations Section. However, the New York Times recently carried an excellent story by Gardiner Harris and Alex Berenson on federal preemption and how it protects the drug manufacturers. Because of the seriousness of the issue, the article warrants mention here. After decades of being dismissed by courts, federal preemption could be on the verge of becoming the law. As a payback for huge campaign funding, the Bush Administration has worked hard for the doctrine. They claim the FDA is the only agency with enough expertise to regulate drug makers and that its decisions should not be second-guessed by courts. The U.S. Supreme Court is to rule on a case next term that could make preemption a legal standard for drug cases. More than 3,000 women and their families have sued Johnson & Johnson, asserting that users of the Ortho Evra patch suffered heart attacks, strokes and even death. From 2002 to 2006, the FDA received reports of at least 50 deaths associated with the drug. The agency did not warn the public of the potential risks until November 2005 — six years after the company’s own study showed the high estrogen releases. At that point, the product’s label was changed, and prescriptions fell 80%, to 187,000 by last February from 900,000 in March 2004.
As we have reported, the FDA is poorly organized, scientifically deficient and woefully short of money. In February, the agency’s commissioner, Andrew C. von Eschenbach, admitted that the FDA faces a crisis and may not be “adequate to regulate the food and drugs of the 21st century.” The Times article pointed out that the FDA doesn’t even test experimental medicines. Instead, the agency relies on drug makers to report the results of their own tests completely and honestly. Even when companies fail to follow agency rules, officials rarely seek to penalize them. The FDA receives a tremendous amount of money each year from the drug companies – the very companies it is supposed to be regulating – which is part of the problem. Lawyers for Johnson & Johnson say that patients should not be allowed to sue the company because the FDA approved the patch and its label. When you consider the FDA’s poor record of approving drugs that turned out to be extremely dangerous and had to be withdrawn from the market, it’s difficult to have any confidence in the agency’s ability to regulate a politically powerful industry. That’s why preemption is so bad for people and so good for the drug industry.
Source: New York Times
- West Virginia Court Upholds Punitive Damages Award Against DuPont
- An Update On The U-Haul Litigation
- Unconscionable Mandatory Arbitration Clauses Challenged
- Plant That Made Tylenol And Other Pediatric Medicine Lacked Quality Control
- Utah Sues Drug Makers For Off-Label Marketing
- Drug Maker Fails To Cooperate
- Predatory-Lending Lawsuits Are Still On The Rise
- Wal-Mart To Limit Toxic Cadmium In Products For Children
- Bible verses for the month
- Parting Words
- Bankruptcies by General Motors & Chrysler
- The crisis in the Gulf makes clear the importance of our Judicial System
- Others share the blame with BP
- Closing Observations
- Bible verses for the month
- First female lawyer to head the Alabama State Bar
- Tom Methvin ends his term as State Bar President
- Gibson Vance assumes the role as President of AAJ
- Laurie Little
- Maureen Manno
- Ms. Bissett,
Below is the contact info for the Spelter class claims administr...
- thank you for any information that you can email me at lucklylady5654@yahoo.com...
- i did live in hughes wv. and included in the spelter lawsuit. i would like to kn...
- Wells Fargo approved my loan modifaction loan for 18 months. Not any of the fun...
- i'm so blessed cause God is a live in my life i've already exprience him.
He k...
- Thnx for the different message because this means a lot in my life. Since i've s...
- I would like to join in on the case and I also have another one. I was a store...
- I am interested in your Bible verses. Making a recent study of Martin Luther has...
- Beasley Allen
- Legal Strategies
- Jere Beasley Report
- Extreme Montgomery
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Oil Spill
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Coal Ash Spill
- Alabama Injury Lawyer
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Tractor Trailer Accident
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Toyota Unintended Acceleration
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Denied Disability
- Morgan Keegan Fraud
- Yaz Side Effects
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Digitek Recall
- Gardasil
- Vytorin Cancer
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Trasylol Recall
- Antibiotics
- Steven Johnson Syndrome
- Reglan Lawyer
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Chantix Recall
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Pain Pumps
- Heparin Recall
- Fleet Attorney
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Lantus Attorney
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
Personal Injury, Recent Settlements - Jul 19, 2010 14:03 - 0 Comments
Wrongful Death Settlement In Civil Damages Act
More In Recent Settlements
- Heavy Truck Case Is Settled
- Settlement of an industrial machinery accident
- Three Explorer Rollover Settlements
- Jury awards $2.75 million in Explorer Rollover case
- Wal-Mart parking lot case is settled
Product Liability - Jul 31, 2010 15:21 - 0 Comments
Reclining Seats Are A Hidden Danger
More In Product Liability
- Cooper Tire Involved In Tragic Highway Crash
- More On The Dangers Of 15-Passenger Vans
- The Overlooked Problem Of Clothing-Related Burn Injuries And Deaths
- A Look At What The Carmakers Have Known
- Jury Returns Verdict In Yamaha Case
Recalls Update - Aug 19, 2010 12:24 - 0 Comments
Prescription Cat Food Recalled
More In Recalls Update
- Roman and Roller Shades by Smith + Noble Recalled
- Perdue Farms recalls chicken nuggets
- Bagged baby spinach salads recalled
- Jewelry from popular tween stores recalled over cadmium
- Wire Feed Welders recalled by Star Asia USA due to burn hazard
Leave a Reply