Transportation - Written by Jere Beasley on Thursday, August 7, 2008 9:17 - 0 Comments
American’s Dont Want Larger And Heavier Trucks On U.S. Highways
A new national survey shows that Americans overwhelming oppose efforts by the trucking and shipping industries to relax safety standards and allow longer and heavier trucks on our nation’s highways. The poll results counter a lobbying effort by the trucking and shipping industries to increase the size and weight of trucks in a six state “demonstration project.” The states in the project are Georgia, Maine, Michigan, South Carolina, Texas and Wisconsin. The two industries have been lobbying Congress to increase the load limits for trucks in these states from 80,000 pounds to 97,000 pounds. According to a coalition of safety groups, larger and heavier trucks will mean more deaths and more damage to roads and bridges in this country.
Officials of Advocates, Public Citizen for Highway and Auto Safety, and the Truck Safety Coalition, a partnership of Citizens for Reliable and Safe Highways (CRASH) and Parents Against Tired Truckers held a news conference at the U.S. Capitol which included relatives of people killed in large truck crashes, or who were injured themselves recently to make their case against the project. Also participating in the news conference were U.S. Senators Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ) and Claire McCaskill (D-MO) and U.S. Rep. James McGovern (D-MA), who were called consumer and safety champions. Public Citizen President Joan Claybrook, in discussing the issue, observed:
There is overwhelming scientific evidence that shows the larger trucks get, the more difficult they are to control, the longer they take to stop, and the more dangerous they are to the motoring public. Today, we are telling the trucking and shipping industries that we don’t need a demolition derby on U.S. highways.
The independent survey of a representative sample of U.S. motorists conducted by Lake Research Partners found that 66% oppose changing laws to allow larger trucks carrying heavier loads. More than 80% believe that trucks pulling two or three trailers are not as safe as single-trailer trucks. The survey also found that the strong opposition to bigger trucks transcends political party, gender, age, and region. Jacqueline S. Gillan, vice president of Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, commented:
The American people have to share the roads with these super-sized trucks and are frighteningly aware of the dangers they pose. Increasing the size and weight of big trucks is an invitation for more deaths and road and bridge damage.
Each year, about 5,000 people are killed and more than 100,000 injured in crashes involving large trucks. While large trucks make up only 3% of all registered vehicles, they account for 9% of all fatal crashes. Heavy trucks also cause heavy damage to roads and bridges and increase the likelihood for catastrophic failure, such as the collapse of the Interstate-35 bridge in Minneapolis last summer, which killed 13 and injured another 145.
The trucking and shipping industries are pushing for larger and heavier trucks as Congress prepares next year to reauthorize the multi-billion dollar surface transportation bill. Congress must consider, not only the lives lost in crashes involving large trucks, but also the burden these trucks put on the nation’s infrastructure. The proposed legislation would protect our nation’s infrastructure and improve safety on U.S. highways by helping keep dangerously large and heavy tractor-trailer trucks off of them. It’s reported that one 80,000 pound tractor-trailer truck does as much damage to roads and bridges as 9,600 cars. Additionally, the cost of large truck crashes exceeds $41 billion per year. There are obvious safety risks created by these supergiant trucks. Congress should say no to even larger commercial trucks on our nation’s highways.
Source: Public Citizen
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Jere Beasley Report
- Extreme Montgomery
- Coal Ash Spill
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Employee Rights
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Trasylol Recall
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Chantix Recall
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Vytorin Cancer
- Heparin Recall
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Digitek Recall
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Pain Pumps
- Reglan Lawyer
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Fleet Attorney
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
Leave a Reply