Product Liability - Written by Beasley Allen on Thursday, May 1, 2008 15:43 - 0 Comments
Roof strength rule delayed again
Safety regulators at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) are having a difficult time updating the controversial standard for vehicle roof strength. The present standard has been on the books since 1971 and a proposed new standard has been repeatedly delayed. Now, NHTSA has asked for additional information from automakers, safety advocates, and the public about the proposed new standards. The most recent version of the rule under consideration at NHTSA would require both sides of a vehicle roof to support at least two and a half times the vehicle’s weight. But safety advocates aren’t buying it. Public Citizen President Joan Claybrook, who headed NHTSA from 1977 through 1981, observed:
The proposal is still a static test - one based on mathematical calculations, rather than a dynamic physical test - and it still is at 2.5 times the weight of the vehicle.
The agency has played games with the regulation since the first NHTSA revision of the roof strength rule came about. Everybody knows the current rule is very weak. The existing standard mandates that just one side support at least one and a half of the weight of a vehicle weight. The initial revision of the roof strength rule from NHTSA required support of two and a half times vehicle weight but would have continued testing on one side only. NHTSA Administrator Nicole Nason now says that double-sided testing is a viable alternative approach.
Safety activists have demanded a “dynamic” rollover test, which would require rolling a moving vehicle to gather data. Automakers insist that such a test will be costly, and that accidents involving rollovers include too many variables to design a reliable test. Each year, nearly 10,000 people die in rollover crashes, but government data suggest that only a small percentage of vehicle occupants are killed by collapsing roofs. Public Citizen President Joan Claybrook had this to say about the proposed rule:
The proposal absolutely ignores ejection and containment in the vehicle during rollovers, in which 10,500 people die each year and another 17,000 are seriously injured. To justify a strong rollover protection standard, the agency should address roof crush, ejection and containment as one standard.
Congress most recently directed NHTSA to adopt a new roof standard by April 2009. NHTSA plans to issue a new rollover rule later this year. I hope the agency will put the safety and welfare of people first and foremost and get the job done.
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Jere Beasley Report
- Extreme Montgomery
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Coal Ash Spill
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Employee Rights
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Chantix Recall
- Pain Pumps
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Fleet Attorney
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Digitek Recall
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Reglan Lawyer
- Trasylol Recall
- Heparin Recall
- HRT and Breast Cancer
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
Leave a Reply