Mass Torts, Medtronic Recall, Recalls Update - Written by Scott Thomas on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 7:21 - 0 Comments
Medtronic Recall Issued for Sprint Fidelis Heart Leads After 5 People Die
Defective lead recall
On October 15, 2007, Medtronic suspended sale of their Sprint Fidelis Defibrillator leads (Models 6930, 6931, 6948, 6949) after receiving reports of 5 fatalities. I am glad to report that Metronic finally took the appropriate action by suspending global sales of the defective leads and recalling the leads already on the market. Unfortunately, however, this defective lead recall came too late for five innocent people that trusted Medtronic with their lives.
Faulty design
The Medtronic recall is for defective defibrillator leads which are designed to carry a live-saving signal from an implanted device to the heart, in the event that a dangerous heart rhythm is detected.
The problem here is that if the lead wires from the defibrillator to the heart are broken or fractured, the defibrillator may erroneously detect an abnormal heart rhythm, causing it to send an unnecessary, painful jolt of electricity to the heart. Or even worse, if a life-saving shock is needed, it may never reach the heart.
Evidently, that is exactly what happened to at least five patients who are reported to have died as the result of a defective lead wire.
The dilemma for patients
According to Medtronic, over 268,000 patients in the United States have been implanted with the defective lead (as part of the defibrillator) since 2004. And of those 280,000, as many as 5,000 - 10,000 patients could see their leads fail within 30 months of being implanted.
Medtronic has offered to pay for the replacement of fractured leads and to contribute $800 towards the replacement surgery, however, they will not compensate patients who wish to replace a “working” lead. So, the great dilemma facing patients and doctors is whether or not to roll the dice with a lead that currently works, but could fail at any time.
The other option would be to shell out thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket expense to replace the recalled lead. This option has the potential to damage the fragile blood vessel that the lead runs through.
A third option would be to leave the defective lead in place and run a new lead along side it.
Each of these options has inherent risks which need to be considered when discussing a course of action with one’s doctor.
The legal option
Beasley Allen law firm is currently reviewing cases against Medtronic, the manufacturers of the Sprint Fidelis defibrillator.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a defective heart lead, you may have a claim against the manufacturer of the Sprint Fidelis defibrillator.
You may contact Beasley Allen Law firm for a free legal consultation by filling out a brief questionnaire, or by calling their toll free number (1-800-898-2034).
- Other races of interest for the general election
- The other congressional races
- Candidate for the Alabama Supreme Court calls for appointed judiciary
- Citigroup may have to pay billions in buybacks
- The outlook for passage of a strong DUI bill appears to be better
- Lilly Zyprexa group buyers win class action status
- High Profile Lawsuit filed on Life Insurance Claim
- Homeowners win their Lawsuit against Farmers Insurance
- Cephalon to pay $425Million to settle Government charges
- Contessa premium foods wins Trade Secrets Case
- Judge awards $1.2 billion judgment to Johnson & Johnson
- Citigroup sues Wachovia and Wells fargo for $60 billion
- False claims Act Case pending against McKesson and Golden Horizons
- Florida sues MercK to recover money spent on Vioxx
- Johnson & Johnson paid $68 million to settle birth control cases
- Class action lawsuit says Biovail misled investors
- Missouri Court upholds $8.5 million Polio Vaccine Award
- Excellent post.Preserve the smashing work,You should definitely have to keep upd...
- First-Class post.Maintain the eminent work,You should definitely have to keep up...
- As many people know, those who undergo MRI procedures often take gadolinium, a r...
- As many people know, those who undergo MRI procedures often take gadolinium, a r...
- Thanks for the notice! It's now corrected....
- It's Hand Arendall LLC, there's no comma between Hand and Arendall...
- I understand that the first $9000 is being currently released and depending on t...
- When you say they are doing this as quickly as possible, what do you mean.? As...
- Beasley Allen Law Firm
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Southern Injury Lawyer
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Support Blog
- FLSA
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Jere Beasley Report
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Gadolinium and NSF
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Heparin Recall
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Digitek Recall
- Trasylol Recall
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Pain Pumps
- Chantix Recall
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
Recent Settlements - Aug 7, 2008 14:15 - 0 Comments
North Carolina Settles Jail Fire Death Claims
More In Recent Settlements
- Settlement Of Wrongful Death Case
- GM Rollover Case Settled In Houston County
- SCOTUS Rejects Continental Carbon’s Appeal
- Roof Crush Settlement with Ford Motor Co.
Product Liability - Nov 10, 2008 10:08 - 0 Comments
Yamaha Rhino demonstrated for CPSC
More In Product Liability
- FEMA not immune from toxic trailer suits
- The overlooked hazard relating to cargo injuries
- Single vehicle accidents remain a problem
- New federal rule attempts to preemt state tort claims related to seat belt injuries
- U-haul trailers and more of the same
Recalls Update - Oct 16, 2008 8:28 - 0 Comments
190,000 Soccer goals recalled
More In Recalls Update
- Rapid Reel recalls portable garden hose carts
- Sony recalls 440,000 Vaio laptops
- Worldwise, Inc. recalls retractable dog leashes
- Warning relating to Bassinets after 2 babies are strangled
- Coffee makers recalled by Sears due to fire and burn hazards
Leave a Reply