Mass Torts, Medtronic Recall, Recalls Update - Written by Scott Thomas on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 7:21 - 0 Comments
Medtronic Recall Issued for Sprint Fidelis Heart Leads After 5 People Die
Defective lead recall
On October 15, 2007, Medtronic suspended sale of their Sprint Fidelis Defibrillator leads (Models 6930, 6931, 6948, 6949) after receiving reports of 5 fatalities. I am glad to report that Metronic finally took the appropriate action by suspending global sales of the defective leads and recalling the leads already on the market. Unfortunately, however, this defective lead recall came too late for five innocent people that trusted Medtronic with their lives.
Faulty design
The Medtronic recall is for defective defibrillator leads which are designed to carry a live-saving signal from an implanted device to the heart, in the event that a dangerous heart rhythm is detected.
The problem here is that if the lead wires from the defibrillator to the heart are broken or fractured, the defibrillator may erroneously detect an abnormal heart rhythm, causing it to send an unnecessary, painful jolt of electricity to the heart. Or even worse, if a life-saving shock is needed, it may never reach the heart.
Evidently, that is exactly what happened to at least five patients who are reported to have died as the result of a defective lead wire.
The dilemma for patients
According to Medtronic, over 268,000 patients in the United States have been implanted with the defective lead (as part of the defibrillator) since 2004. And of those 280,000, as many as 5,000 - 10,000 patients could see their leads fail within 30 months of being implanted.
Medtronic has offered to pay for the replacement of fractured leads and to contribute $800 towards the replacement surgery, however, they will not compensate patients who wish to replace a “working” lead. So, the great dilemma facing patients and doctors is whether or not to roll the dice with a lead that currently works, but could fail at any time.
The other option would be to shell out thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket expense to replace the recalled lead. This option has the potential to damage the fragile blood vessel that the lead runs through.
A third option would be to leave the defective lead in place and run a new lead along side it.
Each of these options has inherent risks which need to be considered when discussing a course of action with one’s doctor.
The legal option
Beasley Allen law firm is currently reviewing cases against Medtronic, the manufacturers of the Sprint Fidelis defibrillator.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a defective heart lead, you may have a claim against the manufacturer of the Sprint Fidelis defibrillator.
You may contact Beasley Allen Law firm for a free legal consultation by filling out a brief questionnaire, or by calling their toll free number (1-800-898-2034).
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Extreme Montgomery
- Jere Beasley Report
- Coal Ash Spill
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Employee Rights
- Fleet Attorney
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Pain Pumps
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Reglan Lawyer
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Digitek Recall
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Chantix Recall
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Heparin Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Trasylol Recall
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
Leave a Reply