Mass Torts - Written by Beasley Allen on Tuesday, July 17, 2007 8:23 - 0 Comments
Merck Sued in Canada over Fosamax
The first Fosamax case has been filed against Merck & Co. in Canada. The drug maker, which is defending about 27,000 lawsuits filed by users of the painkiller Vioxx, was accused in the Canadian lawsuit of failing to warn consumers that its drug Fosamax may damage jaw bones. The lawsuit, filed in Ontario Superior Court, seeks class action status on behalf of the drug’s users. Merck will be required to explain to Canadian consumers what it knew about the risks associated with Fosamax. If the situation is like it is in the United States, Canadians weren’t adequately warned of the risks.
As we have previously reported, a number of lawsuits have been filed against Merck in courts in the United States over the risks associated with Fosamax. Complaints were filed in federal courts in states including New York, Florida, and Tennessee. At least 19 lawsuits were transferred for consolidation last year to a judge in New York. Fosamax was approved for sale in Canada in 1995 to help treat osteoporosis. As reported, use of the drug has been linked to an increased risk of developing osteonecrosis, also known as “jaw death.”
Fiona Peters, the lead plaintiff in Canada, took the drug between October 2001 and August 2004 and was diagnosed with osteonecrosis of the jaw last year, according to the complaint. It’s alleged that Ms. Peters “had no prior issues with bone loss, or bone degradation” and that she “suffered from extreme physical pain resulting from the breakdown of her lower jaw bone and will require further treatment and surgeries.” The plaintiffs in the class are seeking damages, including medical costs, for each person who was prescribed Fosamax. They will also seek punitive damages. It’s too early to determine how many Canadians may be involved in the suit.
Source: Bloomberg
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Extreme Montgomery
- Jere Beasley Report
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Coal Ash Spill
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Employee Rights
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Chantix Recall
- Trasylol Recall
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Pain Pumps
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Heparin Recall
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Reglan Lawyer
- Vytorin Cancer
- Fleet Attorney
- Digitek Recall
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
Leave a Reply