Product Liability - Written by Scott Thomas on Friday, April 13, 2007 10:24 - 0 Comments
Another U-Haul Verdict In Kentucky
We wrote last month about a jury verdict that was returned against U-Haul in Ohio. Now, there has been another such verdict in Kentucky. A trial in Louisville, ended with a verdict being returned against U-Haul in the amount of $11.9 million. Another defendant in the case, Ford Motor Co., had reached a pro tanto settlement, for a confidential amount before the trial. This case involved a 1993 Ford Explorer towing a Ford Contour on a rented U-Haul tow dolly. The towing combination swayed and jackknifed, forcing the Explorer to strike and roll over a guardrail. A rear seat passenger sustained a crushing injury to her spine, rendering her a paraplegic.
U-Haul initially placed its tow dollies on the market in 1982. At that time, it required that the towing vehicle weigh at least twice as much as the vehicle in tow plus the tow dolly. In addition, SUVs were not allowed to be rented and were thereby prohibited as a tow vehicle. Over the years, however, U-Haul has made some changes in its official policy. Each of the changes made by the company was intended to increase its rental market by cutting back on the weight ratio and the SUV prohibition. Finally, in 1998, the current model was placed on the market, and both a “one to one” weight ratio and SUVs were permitted. This obviously made towing by SUVs with that weight ratio extremely dangerous, thereby creating a hazard that had to be known and accepted both by U-Haul and Ford. In other words, both companies were willing to run the risk.
The Kentucky case is especially noteworthy. What started out as a family on its way to a new life in Florida, ended up in disaster on a Kentucky highway. Christopher Burkes, an airline pilot, his wife Corry and their infant son, Ryan, were heading to Florida when their lives were changed forever and not in the intended way. The Burkes had rented the tow dolly from U-Haul in Indianapolis in 2002. The 650-pound dolly should never have been used as U-Haul and Ford allowed it to be used in combination. The dolly was unsafe when used by an SUV like an Explorer because of the high center of gravity of an SUV combined with its narrow wheel base.
Corry Burkes, who was in the rear seat of the Explorer, is now paralyzed. Her baby who was in a car seat, suffered a fractured skull and was awarded $510,739.27 by the jury for medical expenses and pain and suffering. Peter Perlman, an outstanding lawyer from Lexington, Kentucky, represented the Burke family, and as usual did an outstanding job of handling the case. The exceptional discovery efforts in this case by the lawyers for the plaintiff’s allowed the jury to understand how this incident occurred and why it would never have happened had both U-Haul and Ford done the right thing.
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Extreme Montgomery
- Jere Beasley Report
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Coal Ash Spill
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Employee Rights
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Pain Pumps
- Heparin Recall
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Vytorin Cancer
- Fleet Attorney
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Digitek Recall
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Reglan Lawyer
- Chantix Recall
- Trasylol Recall
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
Leave a Reply