Product Liability - Written by Scott Thomas on Friday, April 13, 2007 10:24 - 0 Comments
Another U-Haul Verdict In Kentucky
We wrote last month about a jury verdict that was returned against U-Haul in Ohio. Now, there has been another such verdict in Kentucky. A trial in Louisville, ended with a verdict being returned against U-Haul in the amount of $11.9 million. Another defendant in the case, Ford Motor Co., had reached a pro tanto settlement, for a confidential amount before the trial. This case involved a 1993 Ford Explorer towing a Ford Contour on a rented U-Haul tow dolly. The towing combination swayed and jackknifed, forcing the Explorer to strike and roll over a guardrail. A rear seat passenger sustained a crushing injury to her spine, rendering her a paraplegic.
U-Haul initially placed its tow dollies on the market in 1982. At that time, it required that the towing vehicle weigh at least twice as much as the vehicle in tow plus the tow dolly. In addition, SUVs were not allowed to be rented and were thereby prohibited as a tow vehicle. Over the years, however, U-Haul has made some changes in its official policy. Each of the changes made by the company was intended to increase its rental market by cutting back on the weight ratio and the SUV prohibition. Finally, in 1998, the current model was placed on the market, and both a “one to one” weight ratio and SUVs were permitted. This obviously made towing by SUVs with that weight ratio extremely dangerous, thereby creating a hazard that had to be known and accepted both by U-Haul and Ford. In other words, both companies were willing to run the risk.
The Kentucky case is especially noteworthy. What started out as a family on its way to a new life in Florida, ended up in disaster on a Kentucky highway. Christopher Burkes, an airline pilot, his wife Corry and their infant son, Ryan, were heading to Florida when their lives were changed forever and not in the intended way. The Burkes had rented the tow dolly from U-Haul in Indianapolis in 2002. The 650-pound dolly should never have been used as U-Haul and Ford allowed it to be used in combination. The dolly was unsafe when used by an SUV like an Explorer because of the high center of gravity of an SUV combined with its narrow wheel base.
Corry Burkes, who was in the rear seat of the Explorer, is now paralyzed. Her baby who was in a car seat, suffered a fractured skull and was awarded $510,739.27 by the jury for medical expenses and pain and suffering. Peter Perlman, an outstanding lawyer from Lexington, Kentucky, represented the Burke family, and as usual did an outstanding job of handling the case. The exceptional discovery efforts in this case by the lawyers for the plaintiff’s allowed the jury to understand how this incident occurred and why it would never have happened had both U-Haul and Ford done the right thing.
- Other races of interest for the general election
- The other congressional races
- Candidate for the Alabama Supreme Court calls for appointed judiciary
- Citigroup may have to pay billions in buybacks
- The outlook for passage of a strong DUI bill appears to be better
- Lilly Zyprexa group buyers win class action status
- Big Dig dealth suit settled for $28Million
- Countrywide Settles Mortgage Lawsuit
- Judge ordered release of IndyMac Records
- High Profile Lawsuit filed on Life Insurance Claim
- Homeowners win their Lawsuit against Farmers Insurance
- Cephalon to pay $425Million to settle Government charges
- Contessa premium foods wins Trade Secrets Case
- Judge awards $1.2 billion judgment to Johnson & Johnson
- Citigroup sues Wachovia and Wells fargo for $60 billion
- False claims Act Case pending against McKesson and Golden Horizons
- Florida sues MercK to recover money spent on Vioxx
- Excellent post.Preserve the smashing work,You should definitely have to keep upd...
- First-Class post.Maintain the eminent work,You should definitely have to keep up...
- As many people know, those who undergo MRI procedures often take gadolinium, a r...
- As many people know, those who undergo MRI procedures often take gadolinium, a r...
- Thanks for the notice! It's now corrected....
- It's Hand Arendall LLC, there's no comma between Hand and Arendall...
- I understand that the first $9000 is being currently released and depending on t...
- When you say they are doing this as quickly as possible, what do you mean.? As...
- Beasley Allen Law Firm
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Support Blog
- Southern Injury Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- FLSA
- Jere Beasley Report
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Chantix Recall
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Heparin Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Digitek Recall
- Trasylol Recall
- Pain Pumps
- Fosamax and ONJ
Recent Settlements - Aug 7, 2008 14:15 - 0 Comments
North Carolina Settles Jail Fire Death Claims
More In Recent Settlements
- Settlement Of Wrongful Death Case
- GM Rollover Case Settled In Houston County
- SCOTUS Rejects Continental Carbon’s Appeal
- Roof Crush Settlement with Ford Motor Co.
Product Liability - Nov 10, 2008 10:08 - 0 Comments
Yamaha Rhino demonstrated for CPSC
More In Product Liability
- FEMA not immune from toxic trailer suits
- The overlooked hazard relating to cargo injuries
- Single vehicle accidents remain a problem
- New federal rule attempts to preemt state tort claims related to seat belt injuries
- U-haul trailers and more of the same
Recalls Update - Oct 16, 2008 8:28 - 0 Comments
190,000 Soccer goals recalled
More In Recalls Update
- Rapid Reel recalls portable garden hose carts
- Sony recalls 440,000 Vaio laptops
- Worldwise, Inc. recalls retractable dog leashes
- Warning relating to Bassinets after 2 babies are strangled
- Coffee makers recalled by Sears due to fire and burn hazards
Leave a Reply