The National Scene - Written by Beasley Allen on Thursday, December 21, 2006 7:18 - 0 Comments
The IRS Should Investigate The U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Public Citizen has filed a complaint with the IRS against the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Institute for Legal Reform (ILR), which is an affiliated entity. It’s alleged that the two entities failed to report millions in taxable spending from 2000 to 2004 intended to influence state-level attorney general and Supreme Court races, as well as federal races around the country. Public Citizen also asked the IRS to investigate whether the U.S. Chamber and ILR, which are said to be two separate legal entities, combined funds in a shared bank account to hide accurate reporting of investment or interest income for tax avoidance.
Court records, internal corporate documents, and media reports indicate that the Chamber and the ILR engaged in a massive campaign to affect the outcome of state and federal races through direct expenditures and grants made to organizations that carried out the Chamber’s wishes. Public Citizen President Joan Claybrook observed:
The Chamber is playing an elaborate shell game to conceal its gambit to stack the courts with hand-picked pro-corporate judges. The IRS should promptly investigate its dubious tax reports and address any abuses that it finds.
All 501(c) groups are required to report political expenditures on Line 81 of the IRS Form 990. Despite its own assertions of millions of dollars spent on electioneering, the Chamber and ILR failed to report any political spending from 2000 to 2003. Public Citizen has asked the IRS to investigate whether the failure of the two groups to report political expenditures and to provide accurate accounting of their grants to outside organizations resulted in tax avoidance and a violation of disclosure requirements.
In 2000, the Chamber claimed it spent $6 million on judicial races and bragged about credit for winning 15 out of 17 state Supreme Court contests. In 2002, the Chamber said it planned to spend $40 million on political campaigns, divided equally between congressional and state-level attorneys general and judicial races. As I understand it, none of these activities were reported on their tax returns from 2000 to 2003. In 2004, the first year since at least 2000 which the Chamber and the ILR reported political expenditures, according to reliable sources, both organizations appear to have underreported their spending. They reported a combined $18 million, but in a “President’s Update” memo released the day after the November elections, Chamber President Thomas Donohue claimed the group had spent up to $30 million in races around the country. I am not sure that he wasn’t being very conservative with that number.
The Chamber and ILR also failed to report grants and allocations to outside groups as required by Line 22 of IRS Form 990. Both organizations reported no grants to outside groups from 2000 to 2004. But in a 2005 deposition, a Chamber official acknowledged that the Chamber had partnered with at least six outside groups to advance its agenda to avoid garnering unwanted critical attention. At least two 501(c) organizations, the Washington, D.C.-based American Taxpayers Alliance and the Columbus, Ohio-based Citizens for a Strong Ohio, reported receipt of large contributions from the U.S. Chamber. We know what ATA did in Alabama judicial races. Taylor Lincoln, research director of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division, stated:
The Chamber’s efforts are fundamentally a campaign to reduce corporate accountability in the courts and slam the courtroom door on consumers. Given the egregious corporate scandals of the past five years, the Chamber should prioritize cleaning up its own house before attempting a hostile takeover of the courts.
It will be interesting to see how the IRS reacts to Public Citizen’s request. Clearly, the matter should be thoroughly investigated and appropriate action taken. The Chamber of Commerce has no business being a political organization, in my opinion. Even if that role is appropriate, at least they should follow the law.
Source: Public Citizen
- Other races of interest for the general election
- The other congressional races
- Candidate for the Alabama Supreme Court calls for appointed judiciary
- Citigroup may have to pay billions in buybacks
- The outlook for passage of a strong DUI bill appears to be better
- Lilly Zyprexa group buyers win class action status
- Contessa premium foods wins Trade Secrets Case
- Judge awards $1.2 billion judgment to Johnson & Johnson
- Citigroup sues Wachovia and Wells fargo for $60 billion
- False claims Act Case pending against McKesson and Golden Horizons
- Florida sues MercK to recover money spent on Vioxx
- Johnson & Johnson paid $68 million to settle birth control cases
- Class action lawsuit says Biovail misled investors
- Missouri Court upholds $8.5 million Polio Vaccine Award
- Georgia Supreme Court rules that couple can sue vaccine company
- Experts conclude Pfizer manipulated studies
- New study shows drug samples may adversley affect children
- Excellent post.Preserve the smashing work,You should definitely have to keep upd...
- First-Class post.Maintain the eminent work,You should definitely have to keep up...
- As many people know, those who undergo MRI procedures often take gadolinium, a r...
- As many people know, those who undergo MRI procedures often take gadolinium, a r...
- Thanks for the notice! It's now corrected....
- It's Hand Arendall LLC, there's no comma between Hand and Arendall...
- I understand that the first $9000 is being currently released and depending on t...
- When you say they are doing this as quickly as possible, what do you mean.? As...
- Beasley Allen Law Firm
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Southern Injury Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Support Blog
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- FLSA
- Jere Beasley Report
- Digitek Recall
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Trasylol Recall
- Chantix Recall
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Pain Pumps
- Heparin Recall
Recent Settlements - Aug 7, 2008 14:15 - 0 Comments
North Carolina Settles Jail Fire Death Claims
More In Recent Settlements
- Settlement Of Wrongful Death Case
- GM Rollover Case Settled In Houston County
- SCOTUS Rejects Continental Carbon’s Appeal
- Roof Crush Settlement with Ford Motor Co.
Product Liability - Nov 10, 2008 10:08 - 0 Comments
Yamaha Rhino demonstrated for CPSC
More In Product Liability
- FEMA not immune from toxic trailer suits
- The overlooked hazard relating to cargo injuries
- Single vehicle accidents remain a problem
- New federal rule attempts to preemt state tort claims related to seat belt injuries
- U-haul trailers and more of the same
Recalls Update - Oct 16, 2008 8:28 - 0 Comments
190,000 Soccer goals recalled
More In Recalls Update
- Rapid Reel recalls portable garden hose carts
- Sony recalls 440,000 Vaio laptops
- Worldwise, Inc. recalls retractable dog leashes
- Warning relating to Bassinets after 2 babies are strangled
- Coffee makers recalled by Sears due to fire and burn hazards
Leave a Reply