The National Scene - Written by Beasley Allen on Thursday, December 21, 2006 7:18 - 0 Comments
The IRS Should Investigate The U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Public Citizen has filed a complaint with the IRS against the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Institute for Legal Reform (ILR), which is an affiliated entity. It’s alleged that the two entities failed to report millions in taxable spending from 2000 to 2004 intended to influence state-level attorney general and Supreme Court races, as well as federal races around the country. Public Citizen also asked the IRS to investigate whether the U.S. Chamber and ILR, which are said to be two separate legal entities, combined funds in a shared bank account to hide accurate reporting of investment or interest income for tax avoidance.
Court records, internal corporate documents, and media reports indicate that the Chamber and the ILR engaged in a massive campaign to affect the outcome of state and federal races through direct expenditures and grants made to organizations that carried out the Chamber’s wishes. Public Citizen President Joan Claybrook observed:
The Chamber is playing an elaborate shell game to conceal its gambit to stack the courts with hand-picked pro-corporate judges. The IRS should promptly investigate its dubious tax reports and address any abuses that it finds.
All 501(c) groups are required to report political expenditures on Line 81 of the IRS Form 990. Despite its own assertions of millions of dollars spent on electioneering, the Chamber and ILR failed to report any political spending from 2000 to 2003. Public Citizen has asked the IRS to investigate whether the failure of the two groups to report political expenditures and to provide accurate accounting of their grants to outside organizations resulted in tax avoidance and a violation of disclosure requirements.
In 2000, the Chamber claimed it spent $6 million on judicial races and bragged about credit for winning 15 out of 17 state Supreme Court contests. In 2002, the Chamber said it planned to spend $40 million on political campaigns, divided equally between congressional and state-level attorneys general and judicial races. As I understand it, none of these activities were reported on their tax returns from 2000 to 2003. In 2004, the first year since at least 2000 which the Chamber and the ILR reported political expenditures, according to reliable sources, both organizations appear to have underreported their spending. They reported a combined $18 million, but in a “President’s Update” memo released the day after the November elections, Chamber President Thomas Donohue claimed the group had spent up to $30 million in races around the country. I am not sure that he wasn’t being very conservative with that number.
The Chamber and ILR also failed to report grants and allocations to outside groups as required by Line 22 of IRS Form 990. Both organizations reported no grants to outside groups from 2000 to 2004. But in a 2005 deposition, a Chamber official acknowledged that the Chamber had partnered with at least six outside groups to advance its agenda to avoid garnering unwanted critical attention. At least two 501(c) organizations, the Washington, D.C.-based American Taxpayers Alliance and the Columbus, Ohio-based Citizens for a Strong Ohio, reported receipt of large contributions from the U.S. Chamber. We know what ATA did in Alabama judicial races. Taylor Lincoln, research director of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division, stated:
The Chamber’s efforts are fundamentally a campaign to reduce corporate accountability in the courts and slam the courtroom door on consumers. Given the egregious corporate scandals of the past five years, the Chamber should prioritize cleaning up its own house before attempting a hostile takeover of the courts.
It will be interesting to see how the IRS reacts to Public Citizen’s request. Clearly, the matter should be thoroughly investigated and appropriate action taken. The Chamber of Commerce has no business being a political organization, in my opinion. Even if that role is appropriate, at least they should follow the law.
Source: Public Citizen
- Favorite Bible verses
- Medical Device Legislation Introduced in Congress
- Pursuing a humble heart
- Favorite Bible verses
- A report on the medical devices legislation
- President Obama calls for new consumer protections
- Joan Claybrook honored in Washington
- Complaint filed against Arkansas nursing home
- Lawsuit filed in Geo Tracker rollover death case
- Richard Scrushy is held to be responsible for Health South fraud
- Exxon ordered to pay $507.5 million for 1989 Alaska oil spill
- Court upholds settlement in asbestos lawsuits
- Supreme Court rules against Massey Unit in judicial bias case
- Recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court
- GOP lawmakers warned by ALFA
- Thank you for the beautiful and encouraging Bible verses. Think I will share th...
- This is a very nice article,may the good Lord continue to bless you. Pls I would...
- It was such a pleasure to come across your web site while searching for informat...
- I just want to thank you for all the hard work your firm has done. I'm am so hap...
- As a delegate to the State-wide Mock Constitutional Convention and a member of t...
- Why is no one looking at the actual cost to build the property ? Comparing it to...
- Thank you for your testimony, in an adversarial world. I always enjoy receiving...
- I don't Know about the other cases, but I know that the women who sued Mcdonalds...
- Beasley Allen
- Jere Beasley Report
- Extreme Montgomery
- Coal Ash Spill
- Leaking Storage Tank
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Blog
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Employee Rights
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- Digitek Recall
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Fleet Attorney
- Vytorin Cancer
- Trasylol Recall
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Heparin Recall
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Fosamax and ONJ
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Pain Pumps
- Reglan Lawyer
- Paxil and Pregnancy
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
- Chantix Recall
Recent Settlements - Jul 1, 2009 7:20 - 0 Comments
Serious eye injury case settled in Pike County
More In Recent Settlements
- Greg Allen settles case with Ford Motor Company
- Settlement of roof crush case
- Settlement of Ford Explorer and Firestone tire case
- Insurance Fraud Settlement Involving Liberty Life Insurance Co.
- ALFA Found Guilty Of Insurance Fraud
Product Liability - Jul 1, 2009 7:19 - 0 Comments
The single vehicle accident: a series highlighting often overlooked product claims
More In Product Liability
- Illinois jury returns $2 million asbestos injury verdict
- Three teens killed and six hurt in SUV rollover
- Our clients are examples of the hardest hit victims of the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies
- IIHS research on child seats is revealing
- NHTSA releases new roof crush standard
Leave a Reply