Arbitration Update - Written by Beasley Allen on Friday, October 27, 2006 11:59 - 0 Comments
I mentioned in a prior section that the Pentagon was putting pressure on Congress to take action to protect military personnel and their families. That pressure and an outcry from the public prompted swift action by a Congress that had heretofore ignored the problem. As you may know, amendments to bills in Congress don’t have to relate to the subject matter of the bill being amended. That’s not the case in most state legislative bodies. But, that unusual rule in Congress has now paid dividends for consumers at least this once. An amendment was offered by Senator Jim Talent (R-MO) to the Department of Defense appropriations bill that has now become law. It will protect military personnel and their families against the predations of payday lenders.
This will not only protect members of the military, which is obviously unbelievably important in its own right, but it will provoke needed debate on broader issues of consumer protection. Congress has finally recognized that binding mandatory arbitration provisions are unfair as applied to all members of the military who deal with these loan sharks. How does that correlate with the claim made by Corporate America that binding arbitration is fairer, cheaper, and better for consumers who deal with lenders? It should be undisputed that mandatory, binding arbitration is unfair in any type consumer transaction between a consumer and a large corporation. So now, Congress has passed one of the most important pieces of consumer legislation in the few past decades. The law’s highlights include:
• An Interest Rate Cap that prohibits any lender from imposing an annual percentage rate of interest of more than 36% on loans to members of the armed forces stationed anywhere in the world and/or their dependents. Interest is defined to include all extra charges and fees of any kind, including the sale of related products like credit insurance. This requirement complements existing federal law, which requires lenders to lower interest rates to 6% on loans that Service members open before they enlist.
• A prohibition on lenders from basing loans to Service members on the writing of checks without adequate funds in the bank to cover the check, or on electronic account access or wage allotments that allow lenders priority access to bank accounts or military pay. Loans secured by title to the Service member’s vehicle (Car Title Loans) are also prohibited.
• A prohibition against Binding Mandatory Arbitration Clauses and any other type of waiver of any other right to seek legal recourse.
Obviously, the first two items are extremely important, but the most significant feature deals with arbitration. Prohibiting arbitration is a major victory for consumers. For anyone interested the bill, it can be found at: http://naca.net/MilitaryPaydayLoanLaw.pdf
Leave a Reply
- The Role of a Trial Lawyer
- Favorite Bible Verses
- Sandy Hook Families File Wrongful Death Lawsuit
- GM Recalls Vehicles For Headlight Problem
- Daiichi Sankyo Agrees to Pay $39 Million to Settle Whistleblower Lawsuit
- District Court Sanctions Ghostwriting Of Expert Reports
- IIHS List Of Safest Cars Grows Amid Record Recalls In The U.S.
- NHTSA Needs Adequate Resources To Do Its Job
- Former NHTSA Employees Join Takata Air Bag Defect Panel
- BMW Will Replace Airbags Nationwide
- GM Recalls 83,000 SUVs And Trucks For Faulty Ignitions
- GM Gets 108 More Claims For Defective Ignition Switch Compensation
- Koch Brothers Set $889 Million Budget For Lead-Up To 2016
- Whistleblower Wins Supreme Court Ruling
- Pfizer Pays $400 Million To End Shareholder Suit
- Study Author Says Autism Risk Linked To Chemicals
- Multi-State Dog Fighting Ring Ordered To Pay $2 Million Restitution
- i don' know where is the form to fill up
- do i need to fill up the form
claim UJT-10073675001 Johnson vs USCB...
- sending this in hope for that you receive this and respond . Do I need to fill o...
- I recently saw an episode of BAR on WSFA regarding trying to get the legislature...
- I have a 2004 F150 Lariat crew cab. Driving home from work in 2011 (cold weather...
- In 2005 August 12th my husband commited suicide after being on Lexapro. I notice...
- Anthony Franco, the last part of your paragraph is absolutely not true, the new ...
- I have been searching for something like this ... I have worked 50 to 65 hours p...
Recent Settlements - Feb 9, 2012 7:09 - 0 Comments
More In Recent Settlements
- A Further Update On The AWP Litigation
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Fort McClellan Radio Tower Collapse Case
- Firm Reaches Settlement In Sikorsky Helicopter Crash
- The Philadelphia Story
- St. Croix, Virgin Islands Settlement
Product Liability - Feb 9, 2015 14:42 - 0 Comments
More In Product Liability
- Recalls Of Cars Abroad Prompt No Urgency In United States
- FHWA Opens Website For Public Reporting Of Guardrail Flaws
- Lawyers In Our Firm Settle Industrial Machine Design Case
- Aging and Dangerous Tires On Our School Buses
- Toyota Ordered to Pay $11 Million in U.S. Trial Over Fatal Sudden Unintended Acceleration Crash
Recalls Update - Feb 9, 2015 9:36 - 0 Comments
More In Recalls Update
- Johnson Health Tech Recalls Matrix Fitness Strength Training Machines
- Cleaner And Degreaser Recalled For Chemical Hazard
- NPD Furniture Recalls Dining Chairs Due To Fall Hazard
- Children’s Pajamas Recalled By Star Ride Kids
- CoScentrix Expands Recall Of DD Brand Candles