Court Watch - Written by Beasley Allen on Friday, October 27, 2006 11:40 - 0 Comments
Exxon Back In Court Over 1989 Valdez Spill
As we all know, and as Dr. Bronner pointed out in his article, it’s been over 15 years since the Exxon Valdez spilled 11 million gallons of crude oil along the Alaska coast in one of the country’s worst environmental disasters. It’s difficult to believe that a jury’s $5 billion judgment against the company is still tied up in the courts. But, having dealt with this politically powerful company, I’m not too surprised. ExxonMobil Corp.’s appeal of the Valdez verdict was to be heard for the third time recently in a federal appeals court in San Francisco. As we all know, the case stems from a 1994 decision by an Anchorage jury to award punitive damages to 34,000 fishermen and other Alaskans.
The residents claimed they were harmed when the Valdez struck a charted reef and spilled crude oil along about 1,500 miles of coastline. The captain of the Valdez was drunk and Exxon knew that he had a drinking problem. The jury found Exxon and the Valdez captain reckless in the accident.
Exxon argues it should have to pay no more than $25 million in punitive damages. The corporation, which reported third-quarter earnings of $10 billion, says it has spent more than $3 billion to settle federal and state lawsuits and to clean the Prince William Sound area. In two previous appeals, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ordered U.S. District Judge H. Russel Holland of Anchorage, who was the trial judge, to reduce the judgment against Exxon, saying it was unconstitutionally excessive. Judge Holland complied in 2002, reducing the verdict to $4 billion. Exxon appealed that decision. The trial judge was then ordered by the appeals court to revisit the decision. Judge Holland called Exxon’s actions “reprehensible,” and set the figure at $4.5 billion plus the accrued interest. The appeals court has twice questioned the award, sending it back each time to the trial judge to reduce the verdict. Accrued interest could bring the total amount to around $9 billion.
In the region itself, pockets of relatively fresh Exxon Valdez oil remain on shorelines as distant as Katmai National Park, about 300 miles from the site where the supertanker disgorged 11 million gallons of crude oil, according to government scientists who presented their studies at a conference last month in Anchorage. Jeff Short, a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration researcher, says:
This stuff isn’t changing at all. It’s just the same kind of goo that got deposited there in 1989.
According to the group that administers the settlement money paid by Exxon to the governments, only seven of thirty marine species, resources, or services have recovered to pre-spill levels. Whether the spill is to blame and whether remnant oil is causing harm remains unsettled. Prince William Sound residents are convinced that the spill triggered a cascade of environmental ills. As subsistence fishermen and hunters, they still see the effects of that oil spill on a daily basis.
- Update on 15-Passenger Vans
- Lilly Zyprexa group buyers win class action status
- Report faults FAA over maintenance outsourcing
- Jere Beasley Report, December 2008
- Milwaukee Loses Appeal In Lead Paint Lawsuit
- Fraternity At Alabama Disbanded Over Hazing Violations
- Texas Hazing Lawsuit Judgement Overturned
- Tennessee Motel Sued For $100 Million In Death Of Alabama Woman
- Indiana Soldiers File Suit Over Chemical Exposure In Iraq
- Jury Awards Injured Maine Man $5 Million In Electrical Accident Lawsuit
- Victim’s Family Awarded $36 Million In Wal-Mart Shooting
- Six Flags Amusement Park Settles Kentucky Teenager’s Accident Case
- $141 Million Fraud Verdict Against Bank Of America
- Countrywide To Make $11.5 Million In North Carolina Refunds
- Fund Investors Sue Countrywide Over Loan Modifications
- help pastor...
- I am trying to find the article in Special Recognitions XXV " My Father , Geor...
- Where's the names of criminals like Ben Bernanke and Hank Paulson? They have pe...
- help and pray for israel baptist church pastor...
- Please review my web site and use it in any way to promote the safe use or no us...
- Friday, December 5, 2008
Some Americans once trusted failed FAA Acting Administ...
- My 10 year old granddaughter, Alexis James, was killed in a 15-passenger van sin...
- The backache that doc in a box said was a kidney infection is eventually diagnos...
- Beasley Allen Law Firm
- Coal Ash Spill
- Yamaha Rhino Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Support Blog
- Southern Injury Lawyer
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- Nursing Home Abuse
- FLSA
- Jere Beasley Report
- Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud
- Unum Provident Denied Disability
- HRT and Breast Cancer
- Kugel Hernia Patch Recall
- Chantix Recall
- Trasylol Recall
- Pain Pumps
- Ortho Evra and Blood Clots
- Gadolinium and NSF
- Heparin Recall
- Fosamax and ONJ
- Medtronic Heart Lead Recall
- Vytorin Cancer
- Digitek Recall
- Avandia and Heart Attacks
- Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS)
Recent Settlements - Jan 6, 2009 7:53 - 0 Comments
Class Action Settlement Involving Unearned Premiums For Credit Insurance
More In Recent Settlements
- Roof Crush Case Settled
- Settlement Of A Playground Injury Case
- Settlement In Motor Vehicle Case
- Roof Collapse Settlement
- Settlement Of A Construction Site Case
Product Liability - Jan 6, 2009 13:38 - 0 Comments
W.R. Grace To Pay Up To $140 Million In Asbestos Case
More In Product Liability
- Jury Awards Quadriplegic $11.3 Million In Lawsuit
- Workplace Product Liability
- New Video Shows Inadequacy Of New Vehicle Roof Strength Standards
- Heavy Truck post-collision fires
- Update on 15-Passenger Vans
Recalls Update - Dec 30, 2008 15:38 - 0 Comments
Alabama Firm Recalls Hot Dog Products For Possible Listeria Contamination
More In Recalls Update
- Maine Firm Recalls Frozen Stuffed Chicken Products
- Covidien Recalls Syringes Posing Risk To Diabetics
- Claire’s Recalls Children’s Metal Necklaces
- Sherwin-Williams Co. Recalls Krylon UV Fabric Protector
- Cybex International Recalls Treadmills Due To Fall Hazard
Leave a Reply